It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Three years after the U.S. Air Force added an “A” to highlight the F/A-22 Raptor’s ability to drop bombs, the service is dropping the extra letter from the stealthy jet’s designator.
The plane, which is expected to officially enter service in the coming weeks, will henceforth be called the F-22A — with the trailing letter indicating a first variant, not an extra role.
Gen. Michael Moseley, Air Force chief of staff, who is said to have been unhappy with the F/A-22 moniker, announced the renaming in a Dec. 12 speech to a U.S. Air National Guard senior leadership conference in Baltimore, Md.
Originally posted by BlackThorn311
I don't see why they would take it off....the Raptor was primarily designed to be an air superiority fighter, and that it is. However, it was also designed to have the capablility to attack ground targets (hence the F/A designation). Sometimes the air force just doesn't make sense.... does the F-117 deserve to have an "F" in front?
Originally posted by ShatteredSkies
Plus we cannot forget, that the F-117 designation wasn't really official, due to a misprint, the Pilot's manual's for the aircraft had F-117 printed on the front of it so the name stuck.
Shattered OUT...
The Air Force reconnaissance version was originally called the R-12 (see the opening fly page in Paul Crickmoore's book SR-71, Secret Missions Revealed, which contains a copy of the original R-12 labeled plan view drawing of the vehicle). However, during the 1964 presidential campaign, Senator Barry Goldwater continuously criticized President Lyndon B. Johnson and his administration for falling behing the Soviet Union in the research and development of new weapon systems. Johnson decided to counter this criticism with the public release of the highly classified A-12 program and later the existence of the reconnaissance version.
The USAF had planned to redesignate the R-12 aircraft as the RS-71 (Reconnaissance-Strike) as the succsessor to the RS-70 Valkyrie, which had two test Valkyrie's flying at Edwards AFB, California. However, then USAF Chief of Staff Curtis LeMay preferred the SR designation and wanted the RS-70 to be named SR-70. Before the Blackbird was to be announced by Lyndon B. Johnson on February 29, 1964, LeMay lobbied to modify Johnson's speech to also read SR-71 instead of RS-71. The media transcript given to the press at the time still had the earlier RS-71 designation in places, creating the myth that the president had misread the plane's designation.
Originally posted by Harlequin
except it has 0 A2A capability so that kills that idea.
Originally posted by Harlequin
the F-111 was supposed to be a navy fighter till it got dropped and went to be a bomber instead - the F-14 replaced it
Originally posted by Harlequin
yes it was `heavy` but it DID land on a carrier (at least once)
Originally posted by JIMC5499
The air to air capability of the F-117 was dropped when it was realized that the radar signature of the availible missiles would negate the stealth advantage. It was then decided to use it to attack ground radar sites instead.
Originally posted by JIMC5499
Do you have a link to that information? I would really like to see that. I have heard of the C-130 landing on the Forrestal I didn't know that an F-111 had.
The Navy conducted a feasibility study to deploy the Air Force F-111 aboard aircraft carriers as the next generation fighter/interceptor. A special version of the Aardvark was designed for the Navy and designated the F-111B. Carrier suitability trials were conducted aboard the USS Coral Sea during the summer of 1968 (between war cruises). However, the big planes proved to be too unwieldly for carrier operations. These (failed) trials led to the F-14 Tomcat program going forward.