This topic is in the Aliens & UFOs discussion forum.  (rss)


Reporter sues NASA, alleges UFO cover-up




Topic started on 11-12-2005 @ 07:41 PM by Distortion


heres a link to the article not sure how legit it is but take a look.

www.azcentral.com...



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 11-12-2005 @ 08:37 PM by Amorymeltzer


But this is up there. Sueing NASA is hard enough, especially on the topic of space and science, as they've got some of the best scientists working for them, or in tow. Now, through in the idea of UFOs, which aren't exactly a mainstream idea, and you're toast.

Here's NASA's argument:

Witnesses saw a UFO? We say it didn't happen, and that UFOs have never been sighted. So, we ask you, your honor, to decide. Have aliens visited Earth or not? If the ship does not exist, you must acquit!


Once he rules that they haven't, then NASA wins.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 11-12-2005 @ 08:55 PM by William One Sac


This is an interesting statement.


NASA officials say there are no documents to release and what the witnesses saw was debris from a falling Soviet satellite.


If they have no records of the event, why do they affirm that what came down in Kecksberg 40 years ago was a Soviet satellite?

curious...

EDIT: Just editing to add that I think the lawsuit is a publicity stunt to get viewers to watch the Kecksberg specials. Even so, I believe that something must have happened there.

[edit on 12-11-2005 by William One Sac]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 12-12-2005 @ 01:46 PM by Wirral Bagpuss


NASA getting sued? That should be a hoot !!! I dont think a Cosmic Watergate will occur as a result of this, but i think how this case pans out will be interesting, even though the result is a foregone conclusion, NASA wins !! But who knows, maybe someone will be brave enough to stand up and be counted!! You never can tell

[edit on 12/12/05 by Wirral Bagpuss]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 12-12-2005 @ 01:54 PM by robertfenix


Kecksburg was not a satellite but rather a warhead. Dummy or live I am not sure, but satellites are not designed to re-enter the atmosphere intact. A ballistic warhead on the other hand is. As its the only way to get it to the target.

It requires a pretty heavy heat shield or at least an outer "dumb bell" which is exactly what is described as coming down. Add the Cylic (spelling?) writing on the mounting / boost flange and you have yourself a Soviet era warhead falling on US soil.

No wonder its been covered up

edit and it did come down near a miitary target remember.



[edit on 12-12-2005 by robertfenix]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 12-12-2005 @ 02:06 PM by noslenwerd


I live about 45 minutes away from where this happened. I plan on taking a drive out there sometime soon to chat with some locals about it



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 12-12-2005 @ 03:47 PM by madnessinmysoul


NASA has enough problems right now, can't we just leave them alone long enough for them to regroup?



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 13-12-2005 @ 04:01 AM by kyateLaBoca


Maybe NASA should counter sue for getting their time wasted? Is that possible?



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 










Top Topics Right Now:



Active Topics Right Now:



ATS MIX Podcasts:











Newest Topics:

















ATS Thread Tag System
Members can add a custom descriptive tag to any thread on ATS. Thread Tags will help categorize our site content, help to cross-reference similar threads, and improve the searchability of all ATS threads. This thread is currently defined by these tags:

,
















ATS Server: www2.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.003 seconds
Page processed in 0.073 seconds
7 total database queries (1)









The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.





thread