WAR: Israel Prepares Troops for Attack on Iran, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 3 times


reply posted on 12-12-2005 @ 12:33 AM by The Vagabond
Originally posted by subz
What makes people think Americans would tolerate a war against Iran before North Korea?


North Korea is the economic armpit of the known universe and Iran has oil and a Caspian Sea coast?
North Korea is the strategic armpit of Asia and Iran's geography practically controlls the Persian Gulf?
North Korea can nuke our troops and Iran *probably* can't?
North Korea has allies that have proven their loyalty in the past, and have strong nationalist reasons for getting involved even if it's not smart: Iran does not?

In short, I'm reminded of a line from the movie "Spaced Invaders":
"Why would Mars want to attack the puny forces of Earth?"
"Beacause we'd win!"

Israel doesn't have the man power to attack Iran's nuclear facilities, any one who thinks they do is dreaming. As mentioned in the opening post, "this is no Osirak".


Special ops and a little accuracy with the proper selection of ordinance should do the trick actually. Maybe not the first time I grant you, but with a few sorties on the targets which didn't go down the first time you'd get your results. It's not as if you need to roll into Iran with tanks to blow up a few bunkers and a few dozen buildings.
A few major sorties, some strictly denied assisstance from American aircraft perhaps, disavowed SF incursions from Iraq- the whole thing would be over in a day or two- Israel would probably lose a lot of the men they put in, but they'd accomplish their objective before Iran could mobilize a serious response, and even if they didn't get 100% success Russia would be frantic to stop the war, so the only barrier to UN inspections would likely be China, and they could be blackmailed/bribed into OKing inspections if the US was willing to work hand in hand with Israel in this.

Even if Israel can't get the job done on its own, it may very well be willing to throw out an ill-fated attempt just so to piss Iran off so that the US in Iraq will be caught in the middle and be forced into war with Iran- assuming that we aren't prepared to do it willingly already.


reply posted on 12-12-2005 @ 03:53 PM by Seekerof
Originally posted by crusader
...Isreal can't win a war with, Iran theoritcally with convential weapons, and will have to resort to nuclear weapons

The same things was said in 1948, when the Arab forces that attacked Israel had numerical superiority in heavy arms and firepower [ie:
Israel 1+ tanks versus the Arabs 40+, Israel 2+ armoured cars versus Arabs 200+, etc, etc.], and had no nuclear weapons to fall back on.

Your underestimation of Israel stands in stark contrast to your sureness of Iran's military prowess. On a one-on-one basis, no outside Arab or Western assistance, no nukes, let's not place bets cause you might be unpleasantly surprised...





seekerof

[edit on 12-12-2005 by Seekerof]


reply posted on 12-12-2005 @ 04:05 PM by RebelSaint
First off, Israel publicly announced this "military option" in order to cover all ends and put the world on notice when the UNSC and the international community fails to resolve this issue of Iranian nuclear technology capabilities. That way, when Israel or an Israeli/Western coalition attack on nuclear facilities occurs, Israel can wipe its hands and say that the military option was a last resort that was long awaited should the UNSC fail to resolve the issue.

And as we know, the UNSC much like the entire UN is powerless to actually enforce anything unless it has unanimous support for its SC members. So here is my predicted 6-8 month forecast for the Middle East.

Barring any diplomatic miracle, Israel and/or other Western powers such as America will strike at Iranian facilities sometime in the early months of 2006. You really believe we are in Iraq to bring democracy there? We are using Afghanistan and Iraq as military launchpads for further incursions into the Mid-East for Western gains in resources (oil) and regional influence.

Leading up to the "allied" attack on Iranian facilities, expect an elevated series of domestic and international "terrorist" attacks on Israeli and American, possibily British and French interests. This problem-reaction-solution method is very useful to provide a means for justifying the ends.

After an initial strike on Iran, the road divides. I do not believe it will end in the same passive manner that the 1980 Iraqi reactor incident did. This is the scenario hoped for by the world because the road does not lead to all out war. I believe the opposite reaction will occur for a number of reasons. One reason is that Iran is an Islamic stronghold not ruled under a secular dictator like Saddam was. What I believe is that Iran will respond with the full capabilities of its military and engage all Western/Israeli interests in the region.

I can already envision full scale Jihad and a rallying cry to all Muslims who have reached their final breaking point regarding Western incursion into their interests. If this scenario holds, US and Israeli interests will be threatened in the region which will elicit full response from the West to counter the Muslim offensive.

Expect another 9/11 or something horrific in order to justify another foreign nation coming under the wrath of the New World Order.

Edit: I also failed to mention in my original post that by March 2006 Iran is threatening to have in place an entity called the Iranian Oil Bourse. Trading of Oil on this exchange will be denominated in Euros which threatens dollar supremacy. So all the political, social and economic factors are in place to justify "regime" change in Iran.

Here is a link to an excellent article explaining the Iranian oil exchange to be setup in 2006.

www.321energy.com...

[edit on 12-12-2005 by RebelSaint]
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^



Russian scientists reach buried Antarctic Lake Vostok
  Posted 7 days ago with 83 member flags
Renowned Geophysicist Says Strange Sky Sounds Are Real
  Posted 2 days ago with 74 member flags
Monsanto quits as GM results announced (EUROPE)
  Posted 8 days ago with 72 member flags
Ayatollah: Kill all Jews, annihilate Israel
  Posted 7 days ago with 49 member flags
Is it morally wrong to take a life? Not really, say bioethicists
  Posted 14 days ago with 37 member flags