It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
"We're seeing a huge increase in the number of hospitals and clinics being purchased by religious hospitals that refuse to offer the full range of reproductive care,"
My healthcare network recently merged with a Catholic hospital, and now they won't renew my prescription for birth control pills. Is that legal?
...
And, for now, this is perfectly legal.
When the community hospital in Gilroy opens its doors this morning, it will have changed hands -- and the word ``saint'' in its new name foretells an overnight policy change that will cause hardship for some families.
Most of the faces will be the same, as will most of the services. But a woman wanting a tubal ligation after delivering a baby, needing an abortion or planning to switch to a new type of birth control will be in for an unpleasant surprise.
In this era of mergers and managed care, the Roman Catholic Church is having more of a say in all sorts of women's reproductive health-care services. Five of the ten largest hospital corporations are Catholic. (These are: Daughters of Charity National Health System, Catholic Health Initiatives, Catholic Healthcare West, Catholic Health Care Network, and Mercy Health Services.) There are more than 600 Catholic hospitals and 200 health-care centers serving some fifty million patients a year. And as the hospitals merge and affiliate with non-religious facilities, they often close off reproductive health care for women.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
* Non-maleficence - "first, do no harm" (primum non nocere), from the Hippocratic Oath.
Originally posted by djohnsto77
Don't you think that that's exactly what they're doing by refusing to prescribe a medication whose sole purpose is to cause the death of a baby?
Originally posted by DontTreadOnMe
But it's not just abortion that Catholic hospitals are against. My younger sister needs a hysterectomy but was still of a childbearing age. She could not get the operation done unless she went to another town close by, to a secular hospital.
This was a medicalaly-warranted procedure, not some wild-eyed attempt at birthc control.
Originally posted by lmgnyc
Unfortunately, the Hyde-Weldon Conscience Protection Amendment was enacted last year, which enables vigilante public hospitals to continue receiving Federal funding even if they deny women the right to prevent a pregnancy with emergency contraception or they refuse to perform certain procedures.
Originally posted by djohnsto77
I personally can't imagine anyone refusing to give a hysterectomy to someone who needs one who's not pregnant.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
She could be denying life to future babies by stripping their home from her body.
Originally posted by djohnsto77
I personally can't imagine anyone refusing to give a hysterectomy to someone who needs one who's not pregnant. That just baffles me. If someone does have uterine cancer and a doctor refuses to treat them, that does sound like a violation of the hippocratic oath to me.
I really don't understand the Catholic Church's stance against all forms of preconception birth control either,...
My cousin said that in his ten years working in that hospital there has never been a case that would require choosing the life of a mother over the life of the fetus. The doctors have always tried to save both. I checked with other medical professionals who deal with childbirth and they agree with him. They could remember no case in their careers when the question of choosing the mother’s life during childbirth over the child’s life happened. They did point out there are cases concerning medical treatment on pregnant women that could affect the embryo or fetus. (For example radiation or chemotherapy for cancer would harm the embryo. In these cases there would be a therapeutic abortion or treatment would be delayed. This is not an option in a Catholic hospital.)
Originally posted by FredT
These are the same hospitals that will provide Viagra but not contraceptives
Originally posted by DontTreadOnMe
Originally posted by FredT
These are the same hospitals that will provide Viagra but not contraceptives
... I don't really see a double standard here.
If the purpose of marriage is a children, then viagra is allowed so the man can perform his husbandly duties and impregnate his wife..
Contraceptives are against the rules of the Church.
Originally posted by marg6043
we are targeting not the woman that can afford to pay a private doctor but the needy and poor that can not pay to even feed their own born children.
Originally posted by DontTreadOnMe
My younger sister needs a hysterectomy but was still of a
childbearing age. She could not get the operation done
unless she went to another town close by, to a secular hospital.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
What constitutes a "Catholic Hospital"? What's the
difference between that and a regular secular hospital?
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
Originally posted by djohnsto77
I personally can't imagine anyone refusing to give a hysterectomy to someone who needs one who's not pregnant.
But Dj, this woman could still breed!