They were suppossed to take the parents word that they "believed" he did not have a gun? The same parents who didn't see this coming?
I'm not saying the parents have great judgement, obviously that's just not true. They probably bought the bb gun for the kid though, so they were
in a position to inform the police of that. If you tell the cops the kid has a bb gun shaped like a beretta, they should probably use some discretion
when the suspect points a weapon at them matching the description.
This to me is a tragic example of an action referred to as "suicide by cop" in my opinion, and it's not an unheard of choice for suicide. There is
evidence that this child expressed wanting to die that day.
Agreed and agreed, but that's really not the issue, is it? We know the kid was off his nut, and we know he wanted the cops to shoot him. The issue
is whether or not the SWAT team had foreknowledge about the non-lethal nature of the weapon. The article I posted confirms there was communication
between the parents and police, regarding the possibility the gun was a toy.
If I'm holed up in my house with what looks like a pipe rifle, and my wife tells the officers it's non-functional, or that I don't have any
bullets, doesn't that (to some extent) mandate restraint on the part of the officers?
His actions when confronted could have easily averted being fired upon.
No doubt. Perp X could have avoided the deadly chokehold of Officer Y, if he had never robbed the store to begin with. The problem is that the
police are in these situations every day, and we expect them to use due discretion when it comes to deadly force (even in life-threatening
situations). If there's a possibility of taking the suspect alive, that has to be the goal.
Bottom line, this tragedy was entirely avoidable. I wouldn't encourage criminal charges against the officers in question, but I think they've
proven themselves unfit for the job. They ought to be dismissed.