Originally posted by Buffy
If there are no bomb sounds on the call then it's most likely not from the towers because there were a lot of firemen who heard explosions from the
street as well.
It is from the Tower, the 105th floor of WTC2 in fact. If you listen you will hear him state that clearly. You also hear the tower collapse at the end
as he screams.
Just like the 911 cell phone calls from 30,000 feet, it's likely COINTELPRO.
There's not much anyone can say to that, apart from it's funny how any information that does not support a conspiracy theory and maybe even
discredit's some of them is COINTELPRO. Of course anyone who dares to present such information is COINTELPRO too!
The Cointelpro teams had to create a series of 911 phone calls. The Flight 93 dramatizations are complete fabrications including seat numbers when the
passenger lists didn't even list any Arab names.
The case is still going on, you could travel to where it's happening and tell the families of those involved that they don't exist and are a
fabrication as they enter/leave the court building.
The passenger manifests would have listed Arab names, the lists published by the press are of the victims, most if not all clearly state that the
names are of course in addition to the terrorists. This is one of the worst pieces of so called 'evidence' the Truth Movement keeps trying to put
The real 911 calls were the firemen's radio communications saying that the fires were isolated pockets that could be knocked down with two hose lines
only minutes before the South Tower exploded with a mini-nuke.
Mini Nuke? OK... Anyway back to 9/11, the fireman had reached the first affected floor
of damage. The logic behind your reasoning that there
were only '2 small pockets of fire' in the entire building makes as much sense as saying there was no fire at all because, say, floor 21 was
Little did they realize that transmission probably was their death sentence as putting the fires out would spoil the demolition fireworks.
The 911eyewitness DVD alone has enough evidence to convict the evil doers in court and that's why it got pulled from Wikipedia and is getting its
Google cache blacked out manually from within their database.
Actually if you looked at the cached page and understand HTML/PHP, you will see that there was an error in the scripting on the page. You can still
see the text by click dragging over it. If it was censored there would be no cached page at all.
The days are numbered for tricky Dick and Rummy Don.
Quite possibly, but's it's not going to be brought about by flimsy, warped 'evidence'.
[edit on 13-4-2006 by AgentSmith]