Originally posted by CAPT PROTON
Von Braun said there was going to be a fake invasion.
The could use this fake invasion to unify nations together under one government and depopulate the worthless masses as they see it.
Remember that blurb from Reagan about joining together to fight off a common threat from space. I think he made it 3 separate times.
The goal is to go global and there sure are a lot of people out there who are against it for every kind of reason, so the fastest way to do it
naturally is to kill most of them off.
But I believe prior to that invasion thing, Von Braun said there would be an asteroid thingy to push the argument for space based weapons. So maybe
they have the tech to drop a huge rock on somebody just to prove a point.
Had to rip this from a post I made on another thread, here goes...
careful navigation through FAS.org and a link to a book being sold by the RAND institution which is called Space Weapons Earth Wars
www.rand.org...
here is a link to the meteor as weapon section
www.rand.org...
Who knows, maybe the cattle mutilations are necessary to build fake, ugly, disposable aliens with. Its not to say that there aren't real aliens in
the mix, but maybe they are part of the whole scheme in this intergalactic tale of wag the dog.
Maybe the FEMA firefighter's hand guide dealing with alien crashes was put out a little too soon before it was needed.
Boy this fits together nicely...
Don't wanna go away from the topic of this thread, but Capt Proton, you might have just found what I've been looing for for months... evidence that
Nicola Tesla's "Teleforce" weapon technology is still alive and ready for potential use!
Medium
Presuming that we have some idea of the level of energy the weapon
needs to deliver to the target to produce the particular military effect
we have in mind, the next step is to understand how the energy
propagates through the medium between the weapon and the target.
For targets on or near the earth, the atmosphere normally has the
most significant effect. For radio frequency weapons, the ionosphere
and the charged-particle environment in space may also be significant.
28 Space Weapons, Earth Wars
The idea that propagation conditions vary with weather is as familiar
as a cloudy day. The notion that propagation of radiated energy
through the atmosphere varies with the wavelength of energy ought
to be familiar to anyone who has been sunburned on a cloudy day.
Only selected wavelength bands are suitable for space weapons
aimed at terrestrial targets. For example, hydrogen fluoride chemical
lasers could attack targets only at altitudes above about 14 km. A
deuterium fluoride laser or a chemical oxygen iodine laser (COIL)
could attack targets down to the surface.
Finally, one aspect of directed-energy propagation that is independent
of weather, atmosphere, aerosols, charged particles, or magnetic
fields dominates the effectiveness, logistics and basing of space
weapons: distance. Even though the energy is focused as tightly as
the weapon can project it, its intensity will still decrease in proportion
to one over the square of the range from weapon to target.3 At
the great distances to be expected for space weapons, this effect
dominates. This inverse square dependence has a profound effect
on the combinations of size, number, and altitudes of a weapon constellation
that will make sense.
Weapon
If we have a budget for the energy needed at the target for the effect
desired, including entries for the uncertainty in the amount needed,
coupling into the target, and propagation to the target, we have a
basis for sizing a weapon to deliver that energy. For the sake of concreteness,
we will use a particular instance of this class of weapon for
illustration in this section and the next: a space-based laser. The
principles are the same for other kinds of directed-energy weapons.
Laser technology represents one of the earliest opportunities to field
a lethal space-based directed-energy weapon for terrestrial targets.
The intensity of the energy flux a directed-energy weapon can deliver
to a target is a critical sizing parameter. The higher the intensity, the
less time it takes to kill a single target. The rate of kills possible in a
______________
3In short-range cases, in which the focus may result in a spot on the target too small to
be confident of causing the desired effect or of hitting a vulnerable part of the target,
the weapon may deliberately defocus its beam.
Kinds and Capabilities of Space Weapons 29
given time is determined by the time for a single kill and the time
needed to retarget the weapon to the next target. The kill-rate
capacity is critical for sizing weapons, force structures, and countermeasures.
A time-honored means of overcoming defenses is to concentrate
or mass an attack in space and time to overwhelm the capacity
of a defense. For ballistic missiles, concentration can be
achieved with salvo launches. For directed-energy weapons, the intensity
of directed energy is the fundamental measure of the
weapon’s capacity to deal with concentration.
While this mysterious weapon is not the only space based weapon of this shadowy defense program, it seems fairly obvious to me that this is indeed the
technology that Tesla had theorized before WW2, just a few days before he died and the FBI stolen his notes. There is mention of the influence of
electromagnetic fields, the use of the ionosphere and radio frequency stimulation of air particles on specific targets. There are also refences to
someking of superlaser weapon, but perhaps "laser" is just another way of naming the actual energy beam that the Teleforce weapon is supposed to be
producing.
