It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Caetano
I just have a question for those who are pro America and against the "terrorist".
If some country or group of countries invaded the US, because the considered the US a threat to the world, and in the process they killed thousands of Americans, including your family, how would you react?
I think many of you would do exactly like those "terrorists". You would use bombs, guerrilla warfare, kidnapping, and other non convencional tactics that you consider terrorism, and I consider a simple consequence of war. They are no rules in war, and when a side is much more weak than the other, that side is forced to use the weapons they have.
Maybe you think that the right thing to do by the Iraqui resistance is to wage war against the US in a convencional way. They are not stupid
Originally posted by BlackThought
Exactly how many died the instant the atomic bomb went off? Hundreds of thousands of people died in milliseconds. I was talking time frame the actual amount of time. If you want to talk about counts of people then you want to talk about the amount of Africans and Indians killed for manifest destiny? Think again.
Such as civilian carrying guns you might want to tell that to the security forces or mercenaries the US army hired to do “light” work in Afghanistan and Iraq.
(also the people behind most of the atrosities in Iraq)
BTW again international law has already deemed the invasion and occupation of Iraq as illegal. That is why America did not sign on to the international court. They seem to believe they are higher in standing that the rest of the word. Sound very supscuos to me almost arrogant.
As the point on prisoners; not telling love ones where they are and not letting international observers see the camps puts major dout on your claims of good stewardship of prisons. Abu Garab show your premise is wrong. Let international groups in then let me get a more balanced view of what your claims are. Because I can’t just take your word for it. And again the US claims that they do not have to follow the Geneva conventions. Which includes contact with family. Which they do not allow.
You did not pull yourself up not without a support structure geared to giving wealth benifits to whites. Which is historical. You might want to read the transcripts of the Katrina victims and still see if that is the case. Take the rose colored glasses off.
BTW what party line? Do you know..? I do not belong to a party both are corrupt.
Originally posted by devilwasp
Originally posted by Caetano
If that was true the US had to declare war to North Coreia, 90% of Africa, some countries in South America, some countries in Asia.
I don't think that anyone would believe that escuse.
No it just means they picked him first, dear lord why do people use that exscue?
Originally posted by Caetano
ahahaah do you sincerely believe that? Do you think that the US is going to irradicate all dictatorships and governments that don't respect human rights??
The US don't have the military strenght, political courage, support of the public opinion or economical power to do such an unbelievable thing.
I hope you're just joking.hehehe
Originally posted by BlackThought
name calling where are our YOUR sources?" All I heard is noise as you cover your ears and say LA,LA,LA.
My questions is if i give you the source will you take them to heart of will you dismiss it as slanted media for which seems to be you favortie way to get out of hearing the facts.
BTW did you read the transcripts that fast? because if you did you would know what you said was just way off the mark.
also about race you are also off the mark look ath te cenus data and compute wealth, salary, race, and sex.
Oh? 30,000 civilians eh? How accurate is that number?
Originally posted by LetKnowledgeDrop
What about all the innocent men, women, and children you guys kill and
maim in your daily bombings of Iraq? Since the start of ''Operation Iraqi
Freedom'', there have been over 30,000 civilians killed in bombings alone.
the economic sanctions that were put on Iraq after the Gulf War.
But what did Lord Bush do? He called the troops
back. He couldve easily have removed Saddam, but he
left the monster in to be played another day.....
I won't. Go get us facts (not made up by Saddam)
1,000,000 Iraqis had died as a direct result of the
sanctions, over half of them children..... Dont take my word for
it
DID NOT say that 1 million
Madeleine Albright
Originally posted by BlackThought
And i have did the work but i do not want to hear anything when you see it. because you have not debunked anything but double talked about the G convention almost like Bill O on Fox. LOL
how can you say the prisoners are taken care of well about the convention but the convention does not apply. Pick one please? propaganda is usless to mouthpieces they can't get it right
and you have absolutely no idea what you are talking about (again). the liberal media's definition of torture is standing for hours on end combined with sleep deprivation. techniques used on our own men and women to prepare them for war. the other isolated incidents are just that....isolated incidents, and the perpetrators have been and are being punished. its an unfortunate fact of war that if you take an army trained to win a war and try to make jailers and peacekeepers out of them you are going to have these kinds of incidents. it doesnt make it right, but neither does it mean that this is US policy. you do realize that civilians carrying weapons are legally spies under the geneva convention and can be summarily executed as such under international law. of course not, because you havent researched anything. we give them three squares a day and their own quran. i'd say we treat them a helluva lot better than the international rules of warfare say we have to.
you know, at some point you are going to have to start doing some research for yourself. i'm just about sick and tired of doing it for you.
no, they do not fall under the geneva conventions because they are not uniformed combatants.
also on your "source" two of your sources were about japan and you totally missed the point i was making which you convenintly left out. and the third about the conventions which you just said you do not have to follow.
and agin what sources???
Originally posted by C0le
This moral high ground crap is a bunch of BS,
The difference between Us and them is When/If We torture, We are punishing Murders and Terrorists, Not innocent people.
The only way We would ever become like them is if We intentionaly harmed innocents.
Originally posted by snafu7700
and you have absolutely no idea what you are talking about (again). the liberal media's definition of torture is standing for hours on end combined with sleep deprivation. techniques used on our own men and women to prepare them for war.
The law provides prisoners with the right to humane treatment and provides prisoners the right to an attorney; however, the police and security forces sometimes abuse detainees physically and verbally during detention and interrogation, and allegedly also use torture. Allegations of torture are difficult to verify because the police and security officials frequently deny detainees timely access to lawyers, despite legal provisions requiring such access. The most frequently alleged methods of torture include sleep deprivation, beatings on the soles of the feet, prolonged suspension with ropes in contorted positions, and extended solitary confinement. Defendants in high-profile cases before the State Security Court claimed to have been subjected to physical and psychological abuse while in detention. Government officials deny allegations of torture and abuse.
Jordan
PA security officials torture and abuse prisoners by threatening, hooding, beating, and tying detainees in painful positions, forcing them to stand for long periods of time, depriving them of sleep and food, and burning detainees with cigarettes and hot instruments.
Palestinian Authority
Commonly employed methods of torture reported by the HRF's treatment centers include: Systematic beatings; stripping and blindfolding; exposure to extreme cold or high-pressure cold water hoses; electric shocks; beatings on the soles of the feet (falaka) and genitalia; hanging by the arms; food and sleep deprivation; heavy weights hung on the body; water dripped onto the head; burns; hanging sandbags on the neck; near-suffocation by placing bags over the head; vaginal and anal rape with truncheons and, in some instances, gun barrels; squeezing and twisting of testicles; and other forms of sexual abuse.
Turkey
Originally posted by benevolent tyrant
Would they really object if we simply beat and beheaded captured terrorists?
Originally posted by BlackThought
the point of how many people died in one bomb blast in Japan.
Only America has killed so many people this fast.
More than any suicide bomber or roadside bomb.
You need to learn respect.
I know the covn. every person in the army had to carry the card in WWII. i know them very well. I will give you your sources but i am so afraid you are not going to see the truthof it because of your disregard of international ideas of brotherhood.