It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by centurion1211
A terrorist is one who terrorizes. You can't be one without doing the other.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
Originally posted by centurion1211
A terrorist is one who terrorizes. You can't be one without doing the other.
It all depends on the INTENT.
Originally posted by centurion1211
If (and that's a big if) U.S. troops are actually doing what was reported...
So I have to disagree with you on intent being the only measure (and it's also a semantics defense) and go back to the dictionary-type definition.
Originally posted by RANT
Another mitigating factor as Bob LaoTse has just pointed out is that conservatives....
That's also why liberals "suck" at "this." They tend to have integrity.
Originally posted by centurion1211
More semantics ...
ter·ror·ist (trr-st)
n. One that engages in acts or an act of terrorism
So, that shows that Kerry's use of the word and being called a terrorist are one and the same thing.
Originally posted by centurion1211
ter·ror·ist (trr-st)
n. One that engages in acts or an act of terrorism
definition of terrorist
So, that shows that Kerry's use of the word and being called a terrorist are one and the same thing.
Originally posted by boogyman
The fact that we're still discussing this is not only sad it's depressing.
Originally posted by boogyman
The fact that we're still discussing this is not only sad it's depressing.
Originally posted by SkepticOverlord
Since I stopped posting to this thread, I've been putting crushed glass under my eyelids... it's been such a relief and much more enjoyable.
Originally posted by SkepticOverlord
Since I stopped posting to this thread, I've been putting crushed glass under my eyelids... it's been such a relief and much more enjoyable.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
Originally posted by Seekerof
As such, the issue of whether Kerry called US troops serving in Vietnam as "baby killers" is subjective and interpreted by those who remember such first-hand.
If people said he said it (or implied it), then he said it, huh? Just like here where he 'called the troops "terrorists"'... Believe what you will, Seekerof, but I don't buy it. I'm not just taking your word for it. Besides, I believe my brother. The soldiers killed babies. Are you implying they didn't?
[edit on 8-12-2005 by Benevolent Heretic]