It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by centurion1211
Courage is speaking for freedom while facing tyranny, not speaking for tyranny while living in freedom.
Originally posted by SkepticOverlord
Correct. And by the nature of their various missions, and the occasional need to search civilian homes, someone in your home, with a big gun, will cause a reaction of terror.
No, it's not. You're playing the popular conservative-versus-liberal-versus-conservative political game of subtly twisting the words of the other side to deflect attention away from what someone is talking about (the mission of our troops) to the minutiae of what they said (he used the word "terrorize" which sounds like "terrorist").
The "opposition"? Who is that? Do you mean... those nasty liberals? There's no election right now... why are "they" the "opposition" instead of the real terrorists we've identified?
You've listened to your training very well. You're continuing to play the game you've been indoctrinated to play.
Why? To me, he desires honorable missions for our troops.
It's offensive to you because you're playing the game and twisting words/meanings and jumping to your politically-charged knee-jerk conclusions that focus on the "other side" rather than real issues.
When will you politicos stop pissing and moaning about each other and turn your attention to some real issues?
Originally posted by Herman
Now you're just putting words in my mouth. I never said anything about "Nasty liberals".
What Kerry said is not that "While the troops mission is honorable, a small part of their job might include scaring children, and they should not be doing this." He was speaking out against this war, and part of his argument was that our troops are going around terrorizing kids.
Because I'm taking the opposite side here, it must be a "Knee-jerk" reaction,
Going by your logic, I should be viewing your position as a knee-jerk reaction. See, this is how the ridiculous partisan bickering starts.
he's using his opinion that these troops go around terrorizing people as a reason why we should pull out of Iraq.
when you're doing the very same thing - taking a side of an issue.
Originally posted by swampcricket
If the main stream media would report these positive aspects of the mission things we be alot better in terms of support.
Originally posted by swampcricket
I personally take offense because I was there in Iraq and if you dont do night raids on homes with women and children then you dont find weapons caches that are used to attack US and coalition troops. If you were there which I can tell you were not you would know that is where most weapons and IED components are found
Originally posted by SkepticOverlord
In any event, it appears as though you and most other politicos on the conservative side have been conditioned to take offense to nearly anything Kerry would say. And in fact, find a way to be offended by rearranging his meaning.
Take a step up on the fence here. It often hurts to sit on the fence, but the view is very enlightening.
Originally posted by Herman
Now that's just sugar-coating it. What Kerry said is not that "While the troops mission is honorable, a small part of their job might include scaring children, and they should not be doing this." He was speaking out against this war, and part of his argument was that our troops are going around terrorizing kids. I don't think that you would be too happy if I took a small side-effect of your job here (Admin of ATS), and summed it up with "Skeptic Overlord is a mean guy who pisses people off by sending them mean U2U's",
Originally posted by dbates
He's focusing on the negative, which without twisting his words shows his disapproval of the troops. Find the instance in his speech where he praised the troops and went out of his way to say something good about what they have been doing?
Originally posted by deltaboy
Sooo Skeptic how do you fight a war where civilians are caught in the middle where the battlefield in is the cities and not in the empty fields.
Originally posted by SkepticOverlord
Ah-ha! Indeed! But by your position, I took your meaning to be that.
Do you now see how "adding your translation" to what you believe to be Kerry's meaning only deflects the issue to what he said, not what he's talking about.
Yes, that is the nature of what he said. And yes, he was speaking out against this war, and using that improper mission as an example of why we need to being planning an exit strategy that brings troops home.
Because you're taking "a side" and that tactic very often results in downgrading important discussion from the serious issues to non-important details of what someone else said and how they said it.
I don't think so... I'm pointing out how the partisan side-taking is the game of deflection. It's become a habit in political debate.
Originally posted by Herman
He wasn't using one example of a particular screw up in a mission, he was saying that our troops go around terrorizing kids, children, and not to mention destroying their customs.
He was painting our soldiers in a bad light to futher his own gain.
Can you not see how this would be offensive to someone who feels that they've honorably served their time protecting a noble cause, or someone like me who has family and friends whom I feel are protecting a noble and just cause?
I'm taking the side of an issue because this is the way I feel about it, not because this is the side that the rest of my party has taken.
Originally posted by SkepticOverlord
Not a "screw up", but perhaps an improper mission was the meaning. And yes, the mission does indeed cause our troops to be in the position where they're terrorizing kids, children, families, and coming across as being insensitive to local customs/morals. It's not their fault... it's not their intent... but the nature of the mission places them in an unfortunate position.
Not the soldiers, the mission.
If so, I'm sorry to be leaning on you this way. (and afterall, it's just politics, we can grab a pint when this is done) But try to visualize my point here. A thread begins with an improper title, inspired by the grandiose distortions of right-wingers, who gleefully took an alternative meaning to Kerry's statement. Several people "pile on" with me-too's, so it's hard to sort out the conservative bandwagoners from those with a thought.
Here's the point I'm trying to make... what he is talking about; our troops occasionally being forced into missions that might be a no-win situation is much, much more important than the semantics of how he said it. And this can be just as true for right-wing pundits who are just as routinely and gleefully called fascist nazis by the liberal side of the fence. But in all of this noise, all of this bedlam over the silly games of semantics, the important issue ends up being lost.
Because in the end, there is no media bias other than profit. And news does not general profit, entertainment does. So these "news" stories about Kerry are nothing more than entertainment for the right wing 50% to enjoy... because issues are boring, and not very fun to talk about.
Originally posted by centurion1211
In an interview on "Face the Nation", Kerry said the following:
... and there is no reason, Bob (Schieffer), that young American soldiers need to be going into the homes of Iraqis in the dead of night, terrorizing kids and children, you know, women, breaking sort of the customs of the -- of -- of -- of -- historical customs, religious customs, whether you like it or not. Iraqis should be doing that.
[edit on 12/6/2005 by centurion1211]
Originally posted by centurion1211
In an interview on "Face the Nation", Kerry said the following:
... and there is no reason, Bob (Schieffer), that young American soldiers need to be going into the homes of Iraqis in the dead of night, terrorizing kids and children, you know, women, breaking sort of the customs of the -- of -- of -- of -- historical customs, religious customs, whether you like it or not. Iraqis should be doing that.
[edit on 12/6/2005 by centurion1211]
Originally posted by ptownrob
centurion- It's probably impossible, but trt the truth for once instead of spreading lies to people who may not read honest newspapers that de-bunk your kind of fascist propaganda.