Originally posted by jaguarmike
Not to get ahead of myself here, but have you noticed that only about 40% of us can see the reptilian features? Hmmmm, makes you think. Is it
possible we are more reptilian because we can notice this?
It's funny you say this. Last night I was describing this conversation to a friend, because it was both fascinating and...Well, I like to look at
Not too familiar with the conspiracy crowd, he was shocked by the audacity of the claim. Two examples of evil aliens trying to take over
the world in the guise of attractive women were given with a lead in causing people to see what the author told them to see. No examples of those who
were not reptilian were given, and no explanation other than, "a dream told me so" was given as to why these two women resemble reptilians.
I pointed out to him that that in and of itself does not
negate the argument, it just makes it weak. I told him that, in order to either
strengthen or kill jaguarmike's claim, I would get more quantitative detail that could be tested and applied to individuals across the spectrum. I
then posted my request for specific details. I told my buddy that one of two things was going to happen, and I was banking on the latter.
The first would be that jaguarmike and others would point out specific features and why they appeared reptilian in nature as opposed to
mammalian/human. The would give validity to the claim, showing that there is specific evidence and not just a dream backing up the claim. It would
also show that thought and analysis went into this. Finally, it would cast away the idea in my mind at least that the original poster believes he's
God's gift to human
women, and the only reason hotties are rejecting him is because they're not human. I know, it's mean, but that idea was
there in my mind and would have been cast away had mike taken the time to analyze the individuals in question, showing he had already questioned the
validity of his dream and looked into the issue himself. Then there was the second possible response, the one I expected.
The other response would be that, for whatever reason, and I've heard several on ATS, I cannot see it but you can. No explanation, no description of
the features, etc. Just a condescending or even sympathetic explanation that I, along with the others questioning this, are incapable of seeing the
reptilian features. This response, saying that only 40% of us can see physical features you can't even quantify as being reptilian on these women
while the other 60% are blind to the truth. This response, as I told my friend, would mean one of several things. Either jaguarmike is playing with
those who are susceptible to suggestion to get a laugh at people's willingness to believe in something they fear or hope for. Jaguarmike's a new
member, and as such I can understand this. After all, I did the same thing when I first came to ATS. Another option is that jaguarmike is slipping
into madness. I don't mean that in a derogatory way, either. There is an article on
by an individual whom, after having read it, I honestly believe is
in the initial stages of schizophrenia. Read the article; either he's going mad, this is real, or he's trying to sell a book. Another possibility
would be, as I stated, pride. You couldn't fathom someone not wanting to go out with you when you asked, so they must be alien. This is a typical
argument taken through politics when it comes to the Reptilian conspiracy. Many people don't believe humans capable of having an ideology differing
from their own, so therefore they must be aliens. Same song and dance with a slight twist. Finally, and in my mind least likely, your claim is
legitimate and your eyes are more in tune with matter than my own and you can see physical features I am incapable of seeing. According to most of
what I've read about Reptilians, I'm safe from their corruption, my faith in Christ making them too sick to have anything to do with me. So,
according to all the literature I've read, your case that I don't have enough reptilian in me could be legitimate if Alex Collier and his ilk are
correct on the things that can't be confirmed, while obviously incorrect on the things that can be confirmed such as specific dates given and
prophesies of what Hale-Bop really was (turns out it really was
a comet, folks!)
So, in short, I expected that answer because I don’t believe you can point out what it is that is reptilian about those two women. I don’t believe
you could point it out because I don’t believe it is there.
Do you really believe this? Why?