It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Bripe Klmun
The right to defend one's self is a fundamental right that is hardly just Syria's, Lebanon's, or Iran's alone to enjoy. Israel also enjoys this right. Unfortunately, it seems that when there are suicide bomb attacks, Israel is not allowed to respond without appearing as the victimizers in most of the world's media. Yes, they have nukes. And when was the last time they used them? Ohhhhhhhh, yeah. They haven't. Other countries use WMDs on their own people...
Yes, Israel is a competitor in the world. They spy on us, steal secrets, operate in often blatant violation of our wishes. And I defy anyone to find another nation that doesn't do so...including the US. But after all is said and done, they are the last bastion of true democracy in the Middle East, and as the saying goes...better the foe you know...
Invading Israel is not even an option, and comparing their security fence to the Berlin Wall is an outrageous stretch. I'm not the biggest supporter of their policies, but I find that there are few nations that I do fully support.
Originally posted by gimmefootball400
I do think that it would be very hard if not difficult to talk through to a brick wall. One of these days, Iran is going to nuke Israel. With all this political bickering and fussing, we are going to stop this how?
Originally posted by Riwka
There is a strong relationship between U.S. and Israel.
For what reason should the U.S. invade Israel?
Originally posted by Conspiracy Theorist
i think this is getting off topic... i started this thread, my first by the way . to gauge reactions. If its okay for Israel to obtain nukes to protect there sovreignty then why cant iran if they feel their borders are being threatened by the US presence in Iraq.
The obvious answer is that Iran is not suddenly in the market for nuclear weapons due to the Iraq War. Iran has been playing the nuclear game for 20 years at least...long before we came knocking on their neighbor's door.
Originally posted by Bripe Klmun
Originally posted by Conspiracy Theorist
i think this is getting off topic... i started this thread, my first by the way . to gauge reactions. If its okay for Israel to obtain nukes to protect there sovreignty then why cant iran if they feel their borders are being threatened by the US presence in Iraq.
The obvious answer is that Iran is not suddenly in the market for nuclear weapons due to the Iraq War. Iran has been playing the nuclear game for 20 years at least...long before we came knocking on their neighbor's door.
Comparing a fanatical Islamic regime who has and does sponsor terrorist groups to a country that has been continually harassed since it's inception is a dangerous mistake.
Originally posted by HiddenReality
Israel is the cause of the problems in the middle east today, so i see why some countries there would be happier with them going back to where thye came from.
Originally posted by dbates
The reason Iraq was invaded (finally) was that they were so "In your face" with their defiance. UN resolutions are really toothless recommendations unless someone is willing to put some teeth into it. The UN is in reality a toothless bureaucratic wonder. It really doesn't matter how many resolutions the UN has passed against Israel.
Originally posted by HiddenReality
Funny that, a lot of people think its the zionist jews and Israel that are fanatical, it is the israelis who use helicopters against kids with stones and sticks, who flatten houses full of innocent people...
Simple, CS, we decide because we have done more to keep the peace. We decide by looking at who is going tonuke the crap outta someone else because they simply don't like them.
see, Take Israel as an example. She always extends the olive branch, only to have it shoved back in her face by those who demand that her children learn to swim, yet she doesn't use the weapons in an offensive manner, and has never made any of her enemies learn to swim or die.
Why is it that the obvious must be spelled out, as if it is some huge secret?
Originally posted by Conspiracy Theorist
Isnt the fact that Israel has these weapons offensive enough? it is to me.
especially when there is such an uproar about iran having them.
It was Irans President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s whoi said Israel should be “wiped off the map” - and not the other way.
Not to mention, Israel never said anything about wiping out the other Islamic nations. Its the opposite side where the Muslims vow to put the Jews out to the sea.
Originally posted by Conspiracy Theorist
What do u call it when the retaliation for one mans terrorist act is to fire hellfire missiles into an entire apartment building... with no care for who is inside, guilty or innocent
my conspiracy theory about this thread is that the author will now quit posting, or try to deflect the argument insome other direction.
Originally posted by Conspiracy Theorist
my conspiracy theory about this thread is that the author will now quit posting, or try to deflect the argument insome other direction.
If u read the entire thread.... the argument has already been deflected all over the place... and it hasnt been by me... ive just been responding..