It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Bengals for the superbowl
ICBMs can reach any point on the globe in about 45 minutes from launch.-Quote from American Mad Man
Lets see if this 45 minute claim can actually happen!
Originally posted by Thomas Crowne
Flash bulletin for you, pal; the Chinese military has trained as if we are the enemy for years; no fictional enemy for them. The North Koreans have done the same thing.
Why is it that you can't even try and be unbiased, but post extremely slanted crap as if we, the U.S., is the evil and dark monster of the world.
You know why the world isn't either under a brutal dictatorship or simply burned to a cinder? Because thelikes of North Korea do not have the strength to make a good show of it, that's why. We have the power and have had it for a long time, and have not done the evil things you suggest.
As a matter of fact, we were stupid wnough to allow our forces to advance the Islamic cause in your neck of the woods, in case you have forgotten.
I never claimed we were smart, just that we aren't pure evil - like your buddies.
Originally posted by ludaChris
You do realize China has had nukes since 1964.
Do you live in America Souljah?
Those 8 million people you count were also killing us during this time. So I dont see your logic here, they kept coming we kept killing, if we were so evil we would have ended it by taking drastic measures and using nukes if we wanted to, unleashing the whole kennel of the dogs of war.
And your wrong, wars do solve things, WW2 solved alot, the Korean war kept South Korea free, Vietnam wasnt wrong, but ended up serving no purpose at all.
Gulfwar 1 kicked Sadaam out of Kuwait, Gulfwar 2 installed a democracy in Iraq that already has another election coming up in which even the Sunnis are participating.
Originally posted by Souljah
And why do they have them?
Why does EVERY nation in this World NEED Nukes in order to keep themselves Secure?
Who was the First to obtain and TEST nucler weapons?
No. I live in Europe. In Slovenia.
They kept coming we kept killing?
Wow, just wow.
You are telling that to the 4 Million Dead Civilans, killed in 'Nam?
Or the Tens of Thousands Killed in the Central American Campaigns?
Who started the WWII and Why?
WWII did NOT Save ALOT - it just Killed 50 Million People, Torn apart an Entire Continent, and Created several NEW problems - like the COLD WAR; which resulted in Further Wars in Korea and Vietnam ("good guys" vs "the commies"). Wars don't solve #!
If the USA wanna LIBERATE the Planet of the "Evil and Vile Dictators" I suggest they go to Central Africa, where there are several Civil Wars and GENOCIDES going on this very moment.
Originally posted by American Mad Man
Because Russia gave them to them.
They don't. There are 8 (US, Russia, China, India, North Korea, France, UK, and isreal) nations with them. Do you really believe that all of the other nations are not secure?
No. I live in Europe. In Slovenia.
No wonder you are so bitter.
Again, if you want to blame someone for Vietnam, why don't you blame North Vietnam for invading the South in the first place, and also Russia and China for backing them?
In case you missed it, Vietnam was almost purely a defensive war for the US.
So, had we all laid down our arms and embraced Hitler the world would be better off, right?
You know, for someone who seems to hate Fascism and detention camps, you sure are confused about what WWII solved.
But then we would just be enslaving the blacks instead of Browns Souljah.
Besides, the Kurds were being extirminated by Saddam - don't they deserve to be saved? Or do they not count?
Originally posted by Souljah
And the facts that the British gave Isreal Nukes?
I do not FEEL any more Securo knowing, that there are EIGHT Countries with Nuclear capability, prepared to Obliterate the Crap out of each other for some Petty Warlords! I would be SAFER if there were NO Nuclear Weapons AT ALL!
You should come and see our Beautiful Country before speaking up.
It helps sometimes to actually know what you are talking about.
And the FRENCH again, have Nothing to do with Indo-Chinese Wars?
'Nam was a Cold War Battlefield for the Worlds two Superpowers, and it was about Flexing Muscles.
Yea, I must have Missed that!
Just like you are DEFENDING right now in the Middle East?
Hitler would fall sooner or later.
I am taking about the AFTERMATH of WWII and the Cold War that separated this Planet.
But I bet its the Dirty Commies that are Responsible for that.
My Gradfather Fought the Dirty Fascists Bastards and he give his LIFE for that Fight - so, yea I know a Little.
You know how the Fascists would control our country? They would create a Conflict among their OWN Population: it was the BAD Filthy Communist Terrorists Partisans against the GOOD Catholic Fascist "Patriots" - and they were BOTH Brothers and Sons of a SLOVENIAN Mothers. And that is the oldest trick - to Divide and Rule.
Just like it is Happening Today in Iraq...
You just don't get it...
IF the United States WANT to conduct the World Police Role, they MUST be prepared to use the Same or Equal Force on ANYBODY that Breaks certain Rules that the US is supposed to Represent and Uphold. And Frankly, these RULES are being broken on Daily Basis for FIFTY Years in Africa - and all the West does is SELL them more small arms for them to kill each other!
The Kurds were Being EXTERMINATED by Saddam with Chemicals supplied by the US and the rest of the West - and even when he USED these chemical weapons, the US still sold him more!
Originally posted by Souljah
Originally posted by American Mad Man
Because Russia gave them to them.
And the facts that the British gave Isreal Nukes?
They don't. There are 8 (US, Russia, China, India, North Korea, France, UK, and isreal) nations with them. Do you really believe that all of the other nations are not secure?
I do not FEEL any more Securo knowing, that there are EIGHT Countries with Nuclear capability, prepared to Obliterate the Crap out of each other for some Petty Warlords! I would be SAFER if there were NO Nuclear Weapons AT ALL!
No. I live in Europe. In Slovenia.
No wonder you are so bitter.
You know, for someone who seems to hate Fascism and detention camps, you sure are confused about what WWII solved.
My Gradfather Fought the Dirty Fascists Bastards and he give his LIFE for that Fight - so, yea I know a Little. You know how the Fascists would control our country? They would create a Conflict among their OWN Population: it was the BAD Filthy Communist Terrorists Partisans against the GOOD Catholic Fascist "Patriots" - and they were BOTH Brothers and Sons of a SLOVENIAN Mothers. And that is the oldest trick - to Divide and Rule.
Just like it is Happening Today in Iraq...
But then we would just be enslaving the blacks instead of Browns Souljah.
You just don't get it...
IF the United States WANT to conduct the World Police Role, they MUST be prepared to use the Same or Equal Force on ANYBODY that Breaks certain Rules that the US is supposed to Represent and Uphold. And Frankly, these RULES are being broken on Daily Basis for FIFTY Years in Africa - and all the West does is SELL them more small arms for them to kill each other!
Besides, the Kurds were being extirminated by Saddam - don't they deserve to be saved? Or do they not count?
The Kurds were Being EXTERMINATED by Saddam with Chemicals supplied by the US and the rest of the West - and even when he USED these chemical weapons, the US still sold him more!
You have voted American Mad Man for the Way Above Top Secret award. You have one more vote left for this month.