It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SneakySnake
After 30+ years of research and $$$ being spent in the pursuit of 'proof' we finally have the Giant Squid on film. We knew it was there from caracasses we found but even knowing that it took 30+ years of concentrated, dedicated scientific study and research to 'prove it'.
Is ANYONE spending that kind of money/effort/time on Bigfoot? There are dedicated groups - small and spread out - attempting to get that proof, but nothing on the order of magnitude used for the Giant squid. Until this 'committment' (from individuals or a group) is made, then the probability of getting 'definitive proof' is very low. The probability of finding something you're only half looking for is even lower.
Originally posted by TheBlueSoldier
Even though the Pacific northwest is definetley not a rainforest...
Originally posted by Esoterica
To be fair, we knew that giant squid existed from the carcasses. We just had never found a live one. If we had a Bigfoot corpse, you'd start seeing the money puring in to find a live one. Whereas Bigfoot may exist, there was very little doubt that the giant squid did.