It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by vietifulJoe
@ Im a true sceptic - just have to wait. It's not that hard. In the mean time we can have a life, watch 'Battlerstar Galactica' (tonight is first episode of new season ) and so on. Question I have for you: will you believe even if you are in possession of 3000 page document?
If disclosure is really happening, then for sure they have problem with NSA or are waiting for a good time to send more information...
[edit on 1/6/06 by vietifulJoe]
Originally posted by Freenrgy2
The issue is the incinsistencies in the stories with regards to communication with the eben survivor at the crash site and the eben's on Serpo.
elephants tail just went through the hole!
Think about it. The team arrives on Serpo and then has to LEARN their language (which they had a hard time with supposedly) in order to figure out what is going on, while previously we earthlings had the benefit of communicating via their translating device? Only a couple of eben's (MVC's) were able to communicate with us?
Again, its full of holes and losing credibility fast!
Originally posted by Freenrgy2
Gene Roddenberry did a much better job portraying alien to human communication than this Serpo story ever will.
Originally posted by Centrist
Yeah... TGIF
You can also look at it as a story that still has a lot of blanks to fill-in. The truth of this story will hinge, for my, on evidence that reasonably suggests one conclusion or another. Until then, I would try to avoid interpreting the actions of a hypothetical alien civilization in human terms.
Centrist
Originally posted by Barbadel
----------------------------------------
Forgive me if this has already been pointed out before but I've notice that if we take the number from the Extra Solar Planets Encylopedia (see link above) and look at the Period(days) for Reticulum 4 you get 432.6 days.
See table below:
Planets of the Zeta 2 Reticulum System
====================================================
Planet Semi-Major axis Period(days) Period(years)
---------------------------------------------------------------
Reticulum 1 0.14 (AU) 18.9 (days) 0.052 (years)
Reticulum 2 0.28 54.0 0.1481
Reticulum 3 0.56 152.9 0.4196
Reticulum 4 1.12 432.6 1.12
Orbit: 865 days
Tilt: 43 degrees
Temperature: Min: 43° / Max: 126°
Distance from Earth: 38.43 light years
Now, I don't know if this is a proof that one of the source above is a hoax or if it means anything special but I've noticed that if you double the number of days from the 1st source (432.6 days) you end up with 865.2 days which turns out to be the same as Anon's number (865 days) minus the decimals...
Why do we need to double the number to get the same result?
Nearest planet to SERPO: Named: OTTO
Distance:
88 million miles (colonized by Ebens with research base, but no natural inhabitants on planet)
Number of planets in Eben Solar System: Six
Nearest inhabited planet to SERPO:
Named: SILUS (SILUS is made up of creatures of various types, but no intelligent life forms. Ebens use the planet to mine minerals.)
Distance: 434 million miles
— The first message was just letting his planet know he was alive;
— The second message explained the crash in 1947 and the death of his crew;
— The third message asked for a rescue craft for him;
— The fourth message suggested a formal meeting with leaders of Earth;
— The fifth message suggested an exchange program
— The sixth message provided landing coordinates for any future rescue or visitation mission to Earth. The incoming messages gave a time and date (Eben date and time system), and confirmed a landing location.
Originally posted by onlyinmydreams
Now... so far I haven't seen a single inconsistency in this story. What people are calling 'inconsistencies' are just elements of the story that they haven't thought through... or that they are processing with an almost autistic literalism.
Originally posted by Zep Tepi
Thanks for the pro and con comments regarding the post on communication incostistencies.
The key, IMHO, is the level of communication achieved by the 'mechanic' during his stay on earth. Just one (sick -as in ill) Eben is able to provide a 'full explanation' of the items found in the two craft. To me, a full explanation would be just that, otherwise it would have surely been worded differently in the post i.e. 'partly explained' or 'gave us a rough idea' of the items in the two craft. Just MHO.
Also, consider the level of language skill required to translate the following information from one species to the other:
— The first message was just letting his planet know he was alive;
— The second message explained the crash in 1947 and the death of his crew;
— The third message asked for a rescue craft for him;
— The fourth message suggested a formal meeting with leaders of Earth;
— The fifth message suggested an exchange program
— The sixth message provided landing coordinates for any future rescue or visitation mission to Earth. The incoming messages gave a time and date (Eben date and time system), and confirmed a landing location.
I would have thought you would need an extremely good understanding of the other's language to be able to translate details so specific.
As an aside and regarding the post where Eben #1 pointed out it's Star System on a star map; surely their star maps would have a completely different point of origin to ours and therefore look different? Bearing in mind this contact occured in 1952, how detailed would our own star maps have been? Just a thought.
Not to belabor the point but you are making the assumption that earthlings made the communications to the Eben's planet. The post clearly says that the communications were made with EBE#1's assistance. EBE provided the necessary language skills. After all, he was phoning home.
We don't know exactly what 'full explanation' means and you are assuming it means what YOU would expect it to mean. It's a vague statement. Now, if they had said, "EBE #1 provided the mechanical drawings and schematics of all the devices" that would be an entirely different matter.
And I notice you seem to place significant stock in the description of the EBE as a mechanic. My sense is you're drawing a parallel between the guy who works on your car and this EBE. That may not be fair. Clearly, any mechanic of a FTL craft from an advanced civilization has got to be given props, you know?