Ahhh, the silence of an emptied auditorium... I use the analogy because I think it fits.
Last week this thread was packed with listeners and a few "speakers". Then "issues" surfaced and were summarily ignored while mundane and
"non-topical" questions were answered with aplomb and verbosity.
A few began to request the issue sensitive questions be answered. They were ignored again. Frustrations mounted and lo... a "diagram" was released
and published. Unfortunately the "diagram" was not a sufficient distraction to stop the requests for clarification on the important issues.
The next step was to
twist the request for vetting the "new Anonymous" as some sort of violation of Anon's security. BUNK. The system in
place to vet the new Anon was nothing more than a nuetral third party, admittedly TRUSTED by ALL involved, who could compare the header IP/SubNet
address numbers of communications to the first "Anonymous".
There was no way this could compromise anyone's identity. It would not have necessarily proven one way or the other either, it simply would have been
one more data point in a story woefully lacking data points.
I feel I should point out that one of those requesting the vetting of the "new/#2 Anonymous" is the ORIGINAL Anonymous contact, Mr. Martinez, who I
believe is the only person on the "serpo" side of things that has been 100% forth coming, 100% as honest as he was allowed to be by those giving him
the information. Mr Martinez was fired from his post as the contact for "Anonymous". The interesting part is the ONLY person who had the info/reason
Mr Martinez was fired for was, you guessed it, Mr. Ryan our "speaker" who refuses to vet his source in any way and twists the request into some
ridiculous violation of terms that simply doesn't hold water. There is NO WAY anyone's identity could be compromised through the
vetting
procedure proposed by Mr. Martinez.
After all of that silliness, and going round and round, Mr Ryan realized these intrepid truth seekers were not going to let the vetting issue drop so
he did the logical thing, he took his toys and went home.
Within hours of deciding he would no longer post on ATS Mr. Ryan wrote a letter and presented his twisted, false logic in the hopes the member he
wrote it to would post it here. The member did, in two places. Now Mr. Ryan figured he had a means of spreading his propaganda without the pesky
questions having to be answered. Wrong again. The majority of logical thinking, reasonable people have decided that someone who runs away from
reasonable requests for information to support a major shift in a story that is certainly worthy of "the fantastic claim" title is someone who is
either hiding something or simply can't allow the vetting because it will discredit the whole shift/ transfer to Mr. Ryan from Mr. Martinez.
Naturally, as is always the case, those asking for the logical vetting have been painted as villians, agenda driven discreditors, rude attackers who
wouldn't leave well enough alone. That's the problem, HOW do you leave a huge HOLE in the SOURCE of the info "alone" and carry on with any sort of
credibility?
Now the whole serpo saga has dried up to a drip drop in a large room where all the seats have been emptied.
I agree with SkepticOverlord, those who must believe will continue to discuss this forever. Those who know fact from fiction have moved on at least
until the speaker comes clean OR, and this is my personal hope, Mr. Martinez receives another communication from the genuine Anonymous. Genuine as
best we can tell anyway.
Springer...
[edit on 2-6-2006 by Springer]