It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by centurion1211
So, I guess that means you've also got a problem with how they're doing the airport searches these days. You know, where they pull aside the, cute women, grannies and people in wheelchairs for searches, while letting the people that more closely fit the description of terrorists go by - all so they can't be accused of "profiling". This is such BS.
Originally posted by centurion1211
So, I guess that means you've also got a problem with how they're doing the airport searches these days. You know, where they pull aside the, cute women, grannies and people in wheelchairs for searches, while letting the people that more closely fit the description of terrorists go by - all so they can't be accused of "profiling". This is such BS. If profiling was never used to try and identify suspects, then police would be forced to randomly question people every time there was a crime, even if they were given a description of the suspect.
Originally posted by HowlrunnerIV
Not to mention the date. Why don't you check out what date the Orthodox church holds its Christmas celebration on.
And I don't remember being told that Santa Clause was travelling with the three wise men...How does he figure into things?
The two major Christian holidays, Christmas and Easter just happen to fall on the exact dates of pagan Europe's greatest festive celebrations, one of them being the midwinter feast. How did that happen?
Originally posted by saint4God
Are you really interested in that history or is this another attempt to "prove" Christianity is pagan?
Originally posted by Cug
At the trial his defense was he was on his property and the government had no right to ask for ID... He lost. For some reason I think his name was White but I'm very iffy on that.
Originally posted by Amethyst
I'm pointing out that a lot of "traditional" Christian holidays are rooted in paganism. Bible Christianity is not pagan.
Some doofus way back when (Constantine) decided to merge paganism with Christianity. The real Christians didn't buy it. And I'm not buying it either.
Originally posted by saint4God
I agree we need to separate them out again if that's the proposition. I wouldn't say the birth of Christ is rooted in paganism in any way though, nor his crucifixion, nor thanking God for a bountiful harvest. If we can agree on these points, I think we're on the same page.
Originally posted by saint4God
Originally posted by HowlrunnerIV
Not to mention the date. Why don't you check out what date the Orthodox church holds its Christmas celebration on.
And I don't remember being told that Santa Clause was travelling with the three wise men...How does he figure into things?
The two major Christian holidays, Christmas and Easter just happen to fall on the exact dates of pagan Europe's greatest festive celebrations, one of them being the midwinter feast. How did that happen?
Are you really interested in that history or is this another attempt to "prove" Christianity is pagan?
Originally posted by HowlrunnerIV
The two major Christian holidays, Christmas and Easter just happen to fall on the exact dates of pagan Europe's greatest festive celebrations, one of them being the midwinter feast. How did that happen?
Originally posted by saint4God
Are you really reading the posts, or just flying off the handle?
Originally posted by HowlrunnerIV
At no point do I say Christianity is pagan, I say it's two greatest holidays fall on pagan dates.
Originally posted by HowlrunnerIV
What do I say about Orthodox Christianity? Do you know the difference between Orthodox Christianity and Roman Catholicism/Protestantism?
Originally posted by HowlrunnerIV
Who has temporal/spiritual jurisdiction over Bethlehem?
Originally posted by HowlrunnerIV
The "Christian" holidays of Christmas and Easter have been bastardised almost beyond recognition, most notably in the 20th century by American corporate interests.
Originally posted by HowlrunnerIV
FYI I am a professing Christian. However, I'll take Jesus at his (translated) word: "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you", alternately "Love thy neighbour as thyself" and "Let him who is without sin cast the first stone". All of which I struggle daily to live up to.
Originally posted by HowlrunnerIV
The Patriarch of Jerusalem has authority over Bethlehem, a Greek Orthodox Bishop, not a Roman Catholic Cardinal.
Originally posted by HowlrunnerIV
I know enough about Catholicism and its history to know that it isn't the unadulterated word of God and I know enough about the history of my church to know it exists solely so the king could get a divorce, that alone is probably enough historical background, and a heck of a lot more than many others have.
Contact:
Alessandra Soler Meetze at 305-576-2337 ext. 16.
ACLU Statement on Miami Shield Program
There is some confusion over the specifics of the "Miami Shield" Program. Reports differ as to whether the plan involves large squads of officers stopping everyone at a locale and then demanding people to produce identification. Although the Miami Police Department has claimed that "Miami Shield" will respect people’s right, much of its constitutionality will depend on how the program is implemented.
If police officers plan on stopping people and demanding identification without any reason to believe that there is criminal activity, that is unconstitutional.
When law enforcement stops people based on individualized suspicion of wrongdoing, that is always both more effective and consistent with constitutional principles.
Other post 9-11 law enforcement tactics such as randomly searching subway users in New York City or conducting mass pat-down searches of everyone entering the Raymond James Football Stadium in Tampa violate constitutional principles and are a waste of law enforcement resources.
Originally posted by Amethyst
...commie...
Originally posted by Amethyst
Seems to me like they're backpedalling there.
Demanding someone's ID when they're not suspected of a crime or haven't done anything wrong is a violation of the Fourth Amendment. Period.
If police officers plan on stopping people and demanding identification without any reason to believe that there is criminal activity, that is unconstitutional.
When law enforcement stops people based on individualized suspicion of wrongdoing, that is always both more effective and consistent with constitutional principles.
The ACLU is a pretty hypocritical bunch anyway. They're the first to scream FIRST AMENDMENT! but want to take away Christians' First Amendment rights.
They have their uses (which I can count on one hand and have fingers left over) but other than that, they're really a bunch of far-left, commie pinkos.
Title 18 of the U.S. Code Section 1001, which states that: “(a) Except as otherwise provided in this section, whoever, in any judicial matter within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the Government of the United States, knowingly and willfully (1) falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact; (2) makes any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation; or (3) makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false, fictitious or fraudulent statement or entry shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years or both.”[17]
Under this statute it is a crime to knowingly and willfully make any materially false statement concerning any matter within the jurisdiction of the United States. The falsehood must be material; but this requirement is met if the statement has the “natural tendency to influence or [is] capable of influencing the decision of the decision making body” which receives the false statement.[18] This statute has an extraordinarily wide scope. Unlike perjury, the false statement need not be given under oath. Any statement, whether made orally or in writing, can violate this law.