posted on Nov, 30 2005 @ 02:16 PM
The use of the word "regime" cracks me up.
n 1: the organization that is the governing authority of a
That pretty much describes whatever party is in power.
Benevolent Heretic: You are correct, the conservatives and "The People" did work hard to get into power, but remember, too, that the Demokrauts were
in power for 40 years, and really screwed thing up. It's "The People" who are behind, not the "Bush machine", but the Conservative agenda, which
basically means being behind the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. Why are so many people against that?
dgtemp: and other as paranoid and conspiratorial; please read the following, then notice who signed it:
Executive Orders Bypass Congress
This is a call for the people of the United States to defend their rights.
What are Executive Orders? They are laws established by U.S. presidents. These laws are not passed by the House or the Senate and create an end-run
around the Constitution.
These executive orders are simply printed in the Federal Register. After 30 days, these orders become law and carry the full impact of any laws passed
by Congress. These laws are unconstitutional, because the Constitution does not afford any person the right to create laws by himself that negate the
10995: Seizure of all communications media in the United States.
10997: Seizure of all electric power fuels and minerals, public and private.
10999: Seizure of all means of transportation, including personal cars, trucks or vehicles of any kind and total control of highways, seaports
11000: Seizure of all American people for work forces under federal supervision including the splitting of families if the government finds it
11001: Seizure of all health, education and welfare facilities, public and private.
11002: Empowered the postmaster general to register all men, women and children in the U.S.
11003: Seizure of all airports and aircraft.
11004: Seizure of all housing and finance authorities to establish Forced Relocation Designated areas to be abandoned as "unsafe".
11005: Seizure of all railroads, inland waterways and storage facilities, public and private.
12919: Signed June 3, 1994, by President Clinton. Encompasses all the above executive orders.
This is all part of the new world order, to have the United Nations run us. This is also a part of the Biodiversity Treaty. Refuse to become sheep;
become informed citizens before it is too late.
There is evidence of all of this if you would but ask and seek the truth.
Jean A. Oswald. Shaler
LudaChris: if politicians are bought and paid for, it's mostly by the campaign donations from "The People". I agree with you in that no matter who
is in office, there will be those who *itch and whine and cower in paranoia.
SwearBear: Yeah... they said Reagan wasn't too smart, either. Read one of his books Also, Bush's scoires at yale were much higher than Kerrys.
However, there are a lot of intelligent people out there. but they're just not very smart. That would cover 75% of college professors.
enhancedesign: Exit polls are worthless; your vote is a private thing, and many say the opposite just to screw things up. It's nobodies business who
you voted for. I agree with you about the possible mis-use of electronic voting. I believe we should go back to all paper ballots, with no absentee
votes except for military who are off-shore. Of course, if you do some research on "Chicago-style" elections, it will shed some light as to why the
Dem's were in chargefor 40-sosme years. The conservatives can't match that kind of "machine". 9-11 reporting took precedence, but of the 12 or so
recounts in FloriDUH, all showed Bush as the winner.
Many people mention that Diebold is owned by a Republican, but the other two companies that make voting machines are owned by a Dem... not many
Also, it depends on what polls you read, who gives them, and how the poll is worded. I find it rather odd... well, not really... that ex-president
pantload was the only president that they did two polls for; one for his personal life, and one for his presidential life.
Bandar Paul: The problem isn't the two-party system; the problem is we have one American party... the Conservatives, and one Euro-Socialist Party...
the Dems. The "Constitutional" party is just the opposite of it's name; the Libertarian" party is more Socialist than anything, and the "Green"
party is also Euro-Socialist... they should call themselves the "Global" party, which they are, and that should scare most anyone with any sense at
MagicaRose: No, that law didn't pass, and Congress or the Senate can't pass a law like that; it requires a Constitutional amendment, which all the
states must ratify (not bloody likely) and as someone else saud, it would take many, many years.
We should also go back to term limits on Congress and the Senate, too, but that's not likely to happen either.... sadly.
[edit on 30-11-2005 by zappafan1]