It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
Originally posted by Seekerof
When I get the time, I am going to spank you on this issue.
seekerof
Promises, promises...
You know, I grow weary in presenting further valid and credible sourcings to counter this, as has already been presented in a variety of topics and discussions related to DU and/or this matter and issue. You can join an activism group on this for all I care. The sources 'for' and 'against' have credibly presented and represent both sides of the argument. The issue of DU will undoubtedly continue on for quite some time, with or without further imput from you or I. I have chosen to let the sourcings presented for both sides of this debate speak for themselves from here on out. To continue to debate this issue or matter is like following circle logic; the debate simply goes round and round with neither side reaching any type agreement. It is senseless to continue such redundancy.
Originally posted by Souljah
Lets Check your 4 Links you posted to add to this Debate:
Originally posted by IAF101
The links presented by me are subject to the point I am trying to make at that particular point in the discussion, those links were the most appropriate because they give the official position of the Govt. and the steps they have taken in the greatest detail possible. Also the depth of the study and the analysis are all well referenced and thus enhance the document credibility. They served more as reference rather than any sanctioned proof of my claims and I feel those whom it was meant for have interpreted them as such.
Originally posted by ANOK
Where as you are just linking to government sanctioned sites, and can no way verify what they are saying, can you?
jeez I didn't say everybody had them but MOST have some or all of them...
There's a couple more I forget right now. Those are your same "freakin symptoms"...Common too all GWI vets.
BS again, I was not part of a forward unit, NAVY, we were in the Red Sea...
If I was told to go jump in a minefield I would have said screw you and I would have been in the right to do so. Unlawfull order!
Would it really? You mean those that are sick now would have died quicker?
Or it would have justified using us as lab rats?
Or maybe we were just lied to again, and there were no chemical weopons?
Originally posted by Souljah
Yeah, but still don't you think that .MIL sites are a little Biased when talking about Weapons? After all, they are sponsored by the Army,
and I am sure the Army does not want to hear any "Liberal Whinning" how DU is Bad
I am sorry - but as I have answered to Seekerof, when he "compared" BBC and RAND - I would take Common Dreams instead of FAS anytime of the Week and Twice on Sundays.
Originally posted by Souljah
I am sorry - but as I have answered to Seekerof, when he "compared" BBC and RAND - I would take Common Dreams instead of FAS anytime of the Week and Twice on Sundays.
Originally posted by IAF101]
Every major institution is influenced by the Govt or receives some funding from the govt, do we simply distrust them all ? The FBI which is part of the GOvt brought to light the nixon deal and many other scandals. Why is it so ?
But rest assured the Military is interested in its members and their well being, what sense is their in killing off your own experienced force and using untrained recruits in battle? None. It would be both economically as well as strategically disadvantageous for the country. That is not what the military wants or any sane american wants for their country.
So who is biased here ? Even when presented with the overwhelming truth and fact, which even you have grudgingly accepted, you DENY it !!
Originally posted by Souljah
- did you ever see a .MIL site talking about HARMFUL effects of Depleted Uranium?
www.gulflink.osd.mil...
Q. What makes depleted uranium a potential hazard?
A. Depleted uranium is a heavy metal that is also slightly radioactive. Heavy metals (uranium, lead, tungsten, etc.) have chemical toxicity properties that, in high doses, can cause adverse health effects.
..............
During and after the Gulf War, personnel awareness of the hazards posed by battlefield depleted uranium contamination was generally low. As a result, many personnel did not practice field-expedient measures that would have prevented or mitigated possible exposures.
The two main areas that were not adequately addressed before the Gulf War were:
* The medical implications of embedded fragments and
* Exposure estimates for friendly fire incidents, recovery activities, and incidental contact scenarios.
So - if the Military "Cares" for Veterans, how come that President Bush CUT the veteran's Health Care Budget for 850$ in 2004? Now, that is not a Wise "Strategic" move, don't you agree?
Why are YOU Denying my Sources?
What makes you so much Better, so you CAN do that and I Can not?
How come that YOUR Sources have "TRUTH AND FACTS" and Mine do not?