Originally posted by ArchAngel
A lot can be found on the subject with a search for 'Abiotic Oil', but most sources are Russian.
Western oil experts scoff at such things.
I would have to beg to differ ArchAngel.
Western Scientists have conclusively found that hydrocarbons are created by calcium carbonate under high pressure. Therefore it follows that oil may
actually be abiotic after all.
This information was gathered and posted on ATS last year. I dont know if there are any new developments recently.
Originally posted by makeitso
Here is the PNAS information. Dated 2002.
PNAS The genesis of hydrocarbons and the origin of petroleum
Conclusions from the PNAS: The pressure of 30 kbar, at which the theoretical analyses of section 4 predicts that the H?C system must evolve ethane and
heavier hydrocarbon compounds, corresponds to a depth of more than 100 km. The results of the theoretical analysis shown in Fig. 2 clearly establish
that the evolution of the molecular components of natural petroleum occur at depth at least as great as those of the mantle of the Earth, as shown
graphically in Fig. 4, in which are represented the thermal and pressure lapse rates in the depths of the Earth.
Here is the followup testing (Again) Dated 9-2004
Physicsweb - Petroleum under pressure
Scientists in the US have witnessed the production of methane under the conditions that exist in the Earth's upper mantle for the first time. The
experiments demonstrate that hydrocarbons could be formed inside the Earth via simple inorganic reactions -- and not just from the decomposition of
living organisms as conventionally assumed -- and might therefore be more plentiful than previously thought.
And the PNAS for
it:
Generation of methane in the Earth's mantle: In situ high pressure?temperature measurements of carbonate reduction
Conclusions: The study demonstrates the existence of abiogenic pathways for the formation of hydrocarbons in the Earth's interior and suggests that
the hydrocarbon budget of the bulk Earth may be larger than conventionally assumed. The wide pressure?temperature?composition stability field of
methane documented here has broad implications for the hydrocarbon budget of the planet and indicates that methane may be a more prevalent
carbon-bearing phase in the mantle than previously thought, with implications for the deep hot biosphere (25). In particular, isotopic evidence
indicating the prevalence of biogenic hydrocarbons pertains to economically exploited hydrocarbon gas reservoirs, largely in sedimentary basins (2);
these observations and analyses do not rule out the potential for large abiogenic reservoirs in the mantle. Moreover, the assumption that CO2 is the
sole carrier of mantle-derived noble gasses (26, 27) should be reevaluated. Finally, the potential may exist for the high-pressure formation of
heavier hydrocarbons by using mantle-generated methane as a precursor.
A document from Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Nagoya University, Japan. Dated 1994.
Mantle hydrocarbons: abiotic or
biotic?
It appears that hydrocarbons may survive high pressures and temperatures in the mantle, but they are decomposed into lighter hydrocarbon gases such as
CH4 at lower pressures when magmas intrude into the crust; consequently, peridotite cumulates do not contain heavier hydrocarbons but possess
hydrocarbon gases up to C4H10.
From the Oak Ridge National Laboratory. Dated 1999
Abiogenic methane formation and isotopic
fractionation under hydrothermal conditions
These results, combined with the increasing recognition of nickel-iron alloy occurrence in oceanic crusts, suggest that abiogenic methane may be more
widespread than previously thought.
[edit on 29-10-2004 by makeitso]
From here:
www.abovetopsecret.com...
[edit on 11/27/05 by makeitso]