Originally posted by Stealth Spy
I dont think that your notion that 'the MKI's that will come out in 2010+ will have the same level of technology as today's MKI's' is correct.
You dont get my point in this. ill give you the example i gave waynos
When i was thinking this i was thinking about my phone contract. Im paying $50 a month for 24 months but i can now buy the phone for 300 instead of my
1200 i am now paying
The different block MKI are already incorpated inot the original argument where new developments were already prepared for the MKI. eg. the first ones
will recieve this as a stop gap but when the one in development is finished it will be added as the scheule progesses.
Ok. sudden breakthrough in radar technologies makes the Irbis radar cheaper than what the indian are buying. Because your already on a contract you
dont take advantage of this new thing. Avonics are also different because avonics are made to suit the processor. If a new processor comes out your
avonics possibliy couldn't use it and to make use of these new technolgies you would have to get new avonics fitted.
Long contracts with pre-planned technology routes single batch purchases using technology just made avabile
Well the MKI is still the 'difinitive flanker' presently so as to say. Flight International had an article recently about the new Russian
Al-41F engine, which it says will power future MKI's
Well it might be the "difinitive flanker" today but flanker has lost much of its potency to me since the 4.5:1 vs the EF. Being a older design the
russiasn are just adding new technology to a old fighter. Its just like adding a new engine into a toyota cotrolla. its still using older
technology.
About the AL-41 its about a 1.2:1 ratio compared to the AL-31F and i think the AL-31FP is just a little smaller at 1.15:1. This is according data i
googled before. so its off my head. While being a newer andmore powerful plane it will most probaly be more expensive to build and use according to my
theory that more thrust = more fuel used. The AL-41 should be concentrated to a small lighter platform where its dry thrust could be better used. If
used on the MKI it might probaly have supercruise with clean confriguration because of its sheer size and weight let alone combat mission. Something i
read is that the most fuel used is when you in the 900-1000km speed region so if it does and doesn't reach beyond mach 1 it could use even more
fuel.
More promise should be on a ligther EF sized plane with one engine or a plane as big as the F-22 with two engines. With even one engine it could
probaly make a single engined PAK-FA supercruise because of its 14,500kg thrust. thast massive and when on a smaller plane in the range of about 15-17
ton aircraft combat load would maybe make it go over mach 1 and dry maybe over mach one a little bit. But all this is the specualted AL-41 thrust
Quite honestly i think the MRCA tender has gone out of control. What was initially a tender for 126 everyday mirages or fulcrums with everyday
slotted array radars
Thats what happens when anything gets dragged on. I had a budget of 2,000 but ended spending 3,000 just because of these new releases in power and
memory. i couldn't help myself because i was attracted to better performance.
Well that is the natural human urge to want the best and most problay the EF and rafale have a good chance because of this. The Mig-35 to me doesn't
seem like a good idea. its got TVC and what else?.
What it needs is a nice platform like the F-18 which is a lot more better technologicly advanced with AESA and it would suit the multi-roled
requirment plus a bonus is its the USNs number one plane. I heard there were protest in idnia because of the US secruity pact
But im more inclined to a spilt deal to satify both parties