 |
reply posted on 1-12-2005 @ 10:10 PM by Stealth Spy
|
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 2-12-2005 @ 12:29 AM by centurion1211
|
Interesting. If you you go to the aircraft category list and sort by author you'll find that stealthspy has started over 2 full pages of threads
that are almost exactly like this one. The general theme being that the indian airforce is really up and coming and that the U.S. Air Force is
not.
I keep checking this category because I am very interested in the subject of military aircraft, but I just keep finding the same theme and same
pictures of the same green, orange and white jet that to me still looks like a clone of the 1950's vintage F-102.
Also, I think that something like 19 of the 21 posts (over 90%) in this thread so far are by the author. That's one way to earn points, I guess.
Can we get something new listed here, like the posts from intelgurl?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 2-12-2005 @ 11:57 AM by Stealth Spy
|
Oh boy this wannabe "Roman" ORACLE is back with and he's at his trolling best.
Originally posted by centurion1211The general theme being that the indian airforce is really up and coming and that the U.S. Air Force
is not. 
Must be in your w** dreams. This thread has nothing to with the USAF ... of course one will know that only if one could read.
 I keep checking this category because I am very interested in the subject of military aircraft, but I just keep finding the same theme and same
pictures of the same green, orange and white jet that to me still looks like a clone of the 1950's vintage F-102. 
Another fast one from our favourite ORACLE .... looks light soemone lost his eyesight as well
Here is the 1950 F-102 :
external image
And here is the 2005, 4.5 generation LCA Tejas :
external image
Now ... i could be forgiven for calling someone "the personification of ignorance".
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 2-12-2005 @ 12:07 PM by Daedalus3
|
I don't understand why you keep comparing the F-102 to the LCA even after repeated ridiculement of that comparision by many who incidnetly are NOT
Indian!
F-102:
external image
external image
external image
Compare these with any of the prev LCA photos. It would seem that your comparisions hold no weightage other than some other basic comparisions(and if
you're a military fan then you are beyond rudimentary cognitive comparisions) like :
-->They both have delta wings!!
-->Single Engine!!
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 2-12-2005 @ 12:10 PM by Stealth Spy
|
Ignoring the habitual troll ....
here's more on the LCA ... the weapons integration on the PV-1 is complete and its out in its combat colours 
Here's the new PV-1 (fully integrated with Isreali, French, Russian & Indian weapons)
Here's an old pic of a board at an air show... that showed the Weapons Integration in progress ...
img206.imageshack.us...
Mod Edit: Image Size – Please Review This Link.
[edit on 2/12/2005 by Mirthful Me]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 2-12-2005 @ 12:12 PM by Stealth Spy
|
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 2-12-2005 @ 12:16 PM by Stealth Spy
|
The PV-1 from another view ... cool camo scheme 
external image
____
More PV-2 pics >>
external image
external image
external image
[edit on 2-12-2005 by Stealth Spy]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 2-12-2005 @ 12:29 PM by Stealth Spy
|
LCA CAD images ... with thanks to ADA
Posted with thanks to ADA
[edit on 2-12-2005 by Stealth Spy]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 2-12-2005 @ 12:33 PM by waynos
|
I like the Tejas, and I don't think it is a copy of anything, but do you think that perhaps yopu are flogging this to death?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 2-12-2005 @ 12:46 PM by Stealth Spy
|
The tail section >>
This is a MUST SEE >> Technical document on
the High AoA testing of the LCA (946 kb pdf file - with illustrations)
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 2-12-2005 @ 01:15 PM by Stealth Spy
|
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 2-12-2005 @ 01:36 PM by centurion1211
|
Correcting you on your own information, from your very first post in this thread:
During the last Cope India exercise in February 2004, American F-15 pilots had admitted finding it bizarre that their Indian counterparts had
routed them in many maneuvers. This time round, the buzzword was a studied ‘jointness’, though pilots told this newspaper off the record that the
IAF had maintained its ‘‘one-up’’.
The USAF is especially under pressure from the Pentagon not to show the F-16 Falcon in bad light, since Washington wants this exercise to work also as
a subtle tool for sales to New Delhi. Last year, Senate hearings in the US following the Gwalior exercises indicated that Washington had recognised
that its air dominance was severely eroded following the F-15 Eagles' poor performance against Indian Sukhoi-30s.
This type of quote is common to most, if not all of your threads. That is one of my issues.
Another is that only thing that appears to be new on this thread is that you found pictures of this plane where it was painted yellow  instead of
the usual white, green and orange.
Almost last, tomcat85.free.fr...
Last, with only 4 out of the 30 posts (87%) on this thread by someone other than yourself, you're doing a little better than before. BTW, the 2 page
listing of all your threads in this category translates to around 100 very similar threads! Using this thread as an example, we can multiply that by
the 30 or more times you post in your own threads and we come to an estimated 3,000 posts by you on this subject!
Flogging the subject to death, indeed ...
[edit on 12/2/2005 by centurion1211]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 2-12-2005 @ 02:04 PM by Stealth Spy
|
Perhaps ... you did'nt read this >> Exercise: ‘It wasn’t US against India, but an exercise on how to work together’  ... and
moreover it was an article that i quoted, and those were not my remarks.
If you have a problem with that, i suggest you write to the guy who wrote that article ... and quit bothering me about it.
It appears that you seem to think that every thread is about the USAF  ..try looking at things in a more constructive spirit ... and stop squibbing
about air exercise results.
And lastly, that vintage plane's pic that you posted dose'nt even vaguely look like the LCA....flogging this untrue and riddiculous claim to death
is what you seem to be doing .... this is the third thread in which you have spilt your BS about the same vintage junk.
If you have nothing relavent to contribute ... i suggest you quit trolling this thread
[edit on 2-12-2005 by Stealth Spy]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 2-12-2005 @ 04:18 PM by centurion1211
|
Originally posted by Stealth Spy

I am done with this thread, since with all your posts, you obviously don't need anyone else's thoughts or ideas.
I was simply asking for something new and more interesting for your next 100 threads and 3,000 posts - along the lines of what intelgurl brings to the
table rather than continuously rehashing the same subject ad nauseum.
What color comes after yellow plane? Blue, purple, or chartreuse?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 2-12-2005 @ 09:37 PM by Daedalus3
|
Indeed stealth Spy...You "MUST" start a 'yankee glorification thread' at the earliest!!
Centurion, you're trying to control borad policy.
I suggest you do that by U2Uing the corresponding authorities(mods) and keep this discussion to that channel only.
Actually what you've(SS) done is good IMHO.. Keep All LCA updates in one thread and keep updating that.Maybe it violates the "interactive thread"
genre but we have purely informative ones on the a/c forum as well.
Only thing I feel is that instead of wasting ATS bandwidth give only select pics/info while link all the other info.
Again that is upto the mods and I'm sure they will get to SS on that if it is an issue.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 3-12-2005 @ 12:46 AM by drex4ever
|
Why are they buying somany planes and ships? What they getting ready for? And isnt buying all that stuff more expensive then actually building the
facilitys that can produce the same stuff?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 3-12-2005 @ 12:49 AM by chinawhite
|
Is this reliable
Target locked: IAF aims for Mirage 4000
The Defence Ministry might be on the lookout for a new Air Superiority Fighter (ASF) aircraft for the Indian Air Force (IAF) but it is not going to be
the US F-16. According to a senior official in the ministry, the government has zeroed in on Mirage 4000, manufactured by Dassault Bréguet of
France.
Sources said that senior officials from both the Defence Ministry and the IAF had already checked out Mirage 4000 and had expressed satisfaction on
its performance and the features provided by the French manufacturer. "A suitable quotation has been received from Dassault Bréguet and since the
IAF has already used Mirage 2000, the latest from the Mirage stable is gaining over F-16," sources added. 
Source
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 3-12-2005 @ 03:44 AM by Stealth Spy
|
HT is a very good source ...I am perplexed by that news .... perhaps the upgraded Mirage-2000-5 that France are offering has been renamed Mirage-4000
(just like the Mig-29 OVT with many more avionics upgrades is now called the Mig-35) ..and this is not the cancelled Super Mirage project that was the
predecessor of the Rafale project.
[edit on 3-12-2005 by Stealth Spy]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 3-12-2005 @ 04:29 AM by waynos
|
Although the Mirage 4000 was a great aeroplane, you might call it France's answer to teh Avro Arrow and TSR 2 in that it was at least as good as the
best in the world at the time, but was still thrown away, it was abandoned 20 years ago and has undertaken no development since then.
I would be very surprised if it is the 'real' Mirage 4000, maybe you are right and it is a designation that has been applied to a Mirage 2000
variant
external image
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 3-12-2005 @ 05:05 AM by Stealth Spy
|
This link reads >> At the end of 2005 the Indian Air Force (IAF) showed interest in this plane.
www.fighter-planes.com...
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |