It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

NEWS: China prepares to invade "inferior white race's" countries

page: 2
7
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:
apc

posted on Nov, 25 2005 @ 07:39 PM
link   

Originally posted by soficrow
3. In direct response to the Nine Commentaries, over 5.6 million Chinese people have renounced the Chinese Communist Party, with thousands more renouncing the Party every day.


While 5.6million Chinese is pretty miniscule number, I must say...
Shucks.

I was looking forward to unleashing my baby mossberg on some red Reds.

I'm still not too thrilled about the results of that survey... assuming they were real and undoctored.




posted on Nov, 25 2005 @ 07:45 PM
link   
isn’t there a ‘nuclear bondage’ theory? It means that since nuclear weapons have bound the security of the entire world, all will die together if death is inevitable. In my view, there is another kind of bondage, and that is, the fate our Party is tied up with that of the whole world. If we, the CCP, are finished, China will be finished, and the world will be finished.


....he sounds a bit insane



posted on Nov, 25 2005 @ 07:51 PM
link   
Its nice to see all the Yanks claiming a Chinese Army will meet it's end if they occupy the US with every man, woman and child rising up against those nasty commies...

What you don't seem to realise is that this speech was advocating genocide..hence there wont be any "snipers everywhere" and the good Ol' US of A citizens rising up against an oppressor.

Thats also assuming that many people would want to fight anyway. Most people would be concerned with survival rather than resistance.

Those that are left would be so demoralised or be unwiling to fight as to make any insurgency negligable.



posted on Nov, 25 2005 @ 08:09 PM
link   

stumason said:Those that are left would be so demoralised or be unwiling to fight as to make any insurgency negligable.

I disagree. Purposeful action (killing invaders) would be a pretty useful, rehabilitative thing for survivors of a "genocide" to do. In any case, you are right stumason that this guy is speaking about genocide, and of course Japan actually succeeded in getting "bioweapons" into the US during WWII (nobody died, but at least one of the disease-balloons made it over here) so there's at least one crude precedence.

Even if genocide of some kind is 50% effective, the remaining half who survive would fight. Americans are the best and most copious marksmen in the world. What invader would ever be content in an occupied USA when their head can get taken off by a rifle bullet at any time?



posted on Nov, 25 2005 @ 08:25 PM
link   

Originally posted by stumason


Thats also assuming that many people would want to fight anyway. Most people would be concerned with survival rather than resistance.

Those that are left would be so demoralised or be unwiling to fight as to make any insurgency negligable.


Are you serious? Please read up on U.S. history... I don't think you understand what it means to be American.



posted on Nov, 25 2005 @ 08:27 PM
link   
Lets hope so...In fact, lets hope it never comes to that at all!




Americans are the best and most copious marksmen in the world.


I would disagree. Certainly there are those who can shoot, but best marksmen in the world? Hmmm......

I can think of many people in the UK Armed Forces who have the pleasure of working alongside the US Army who would disagree and can think of many instances of the US being unable to distinguish between friend and foe...

But then, you still hit the target, regardless of who they were



posted on Nov, 25 2005 @ 08:28 PM
link   

Originally posted by apc
...................
The rest of the world would unite against them, and crush them.


Not really, nowadays a lot of people would give up easily rather than fight.

Look at the response of voters in Spain to the terrorist attacks there....

Look at the calls for peace nomatter what from all the peace groups around the world....

Not only this, but Europe is accepting socialism more and more, they would accept China being their master and oppressor, before attempting to fight the dragon.



posted on Nov, 25 2005 @ 08:32 PM
link   
BTW, since one of China's goals is to take over new lands for resources, using nuclear weapons is not an option, unless they don't plan on taking over certain countries. using nuclear devices on any country would almost surely render a great portion of that country uninhabitable for a long period of time. Hence why the Communist party in China, and some other places, are taking their time and playing chess with the rest of the world.



posted on Nov, 25 2005 @ 08:36 PM
link   

Originally posted by rmatrem
Are you serious? Please read up on U.S. history... I don't think you understand what it means to be American.


History? There is no precedent, barring the Revolution.

Really, how many times has the US actually been occupied?

I am talking about now, not 200 years ago. The average Joe in the US is not a soldier and you cannot rely on the populace at large to take up arms. Most are comfortable in their little lives and if push came to shove I doubt you would see a mass rebellion.

Isolated pockets of resistance maybe, but put a normal person in a survival situation and most would do what was necessary to survive and that would undoubtably be not fighting those who would be in control of food and water supplies. If the American people are so fiery and will rise up against any oppressor, then why are so many apathetic about doing something about your own corrupt, morally bankrupt Government?

Because most don't actually care. Its the same in any developed nation. People are to fat, lazy and apathetic to do anything about anything. And the Americans are the fattest and lazyiest of the lot (no offence, but Americans do have the worlds highest levels of obesity and other "rich" dieseases)

Whilst you may have nice, rosy ideals about the "Brave American people", truth is, can you really rely on you fellow citizen to be such a person?

In any case, the Chinese dude has made it quite clear he would not concern himself about civilian deaths, so any uprising would be met with a massacre. They want the land, not the people.



posted on Nov, 25 2005 @ 08:56 PM
link   
Someone here has question the source but no-one here seems to care.

The first atricle started off like this

The following is a transcript of a speech believed to have been given by Mr. Chi Haotian, Minster of Defense and vice-chairman of China’s Central Military Commission. Independently verifying the authorship of the speech is not possible. It is worth reading because it is believed to set out the CCP’s strategy for the development of China.


This was published by the Epoch times which is a cult anti communist website. Can a source get any better than this?



posted on Nov, 25 2005 @ 08:57 PM
link   
I say nuke 'em first.



posted on Nov, 25 2005 @ 09:08 PM
link   
nevermind

[edit on 25-11-2005 by Chris McGee]



posted on Nov, 25 2005 @ 09:09 PM
link   
Come on..... did they really have to dress EXACTLY like Hitler and use the term "Superior race"? They could at least make their own.

And also, why the heck is there one white girl, one british guard, and one british policemen in the background of that picture???? Am I missing something?



posted on Nov, 25 2005 @ 09:09 PM
link   

Originally posted by stumason then why are so many apathetic about doing something about your own corrupt, morally bankrupt Government?


well because its not a foreign entity, most think "as long as theyre american, we're ok" and dont take kindly to foreigners on their land, like most nations.



posted on Nov, 25 2005 @ 09:22 PM
link   

Originally posted by stumason

Originally posted by rmatrem
Are you serious? Please read up on U.S. history... I don't think you understand what it means to be American.


History? There is no precedent, barring the Revolution.

Really, how many times has the US actually been occupied?

I am talking about now, not 200 years ago. The average Joe in the US is not a soldier and you cannot rely on the populace at large to take up arms. Most are comfortable in their little lives and if push came to shove I doubt you would see a mass rebellion.

Isolated pockets of resistance maybe, but put a normal person in a survival situation and most would do what was necessary to survive and that would undoubtably be not fighting those who would be in control of food and water supplies. If the American people are so fiery and will rise up against any oppressor, then why are so many apathetic about doing something about your own corrupt, morally bankrupt Government?

Because most don't actually care. Its the same in any developed nation. People are to fat, lazy and apathetic to do anything about anything. And the Americans are the fattest and lazyiest of the lot (no offence, but Americans do have the worlds highest levels of obesity and other "rich" dieseases)

Whilst you may have nice, rosy ideals about the "Brave American people", truth is, can you really rely on you fellow citizen to be such a person?

In any case, the Chinese dude has made it quite clear he would not concern himself about civilian deaths, so any uprising would be met with a massacre. They want the land, not the people.


Ramble ramble... blah blah blah.. you clearly missed the point.



posted on Nov, 25 2005 @ 09:29 PM
link   

Originally posted by chinawhite
Someone here has question the source but no-one here seems to care.

The first atricle started off like this

The following is a transcript of a speech believed to have been given by Mr. Chi Haotian, Minster of Defense and vice-chairman of China’s Central Military Commission. Independently verifying the authorship of the speech is not possible. It is worth reading because it is believed to set out the CCP’s strategy for the development of China.


This was published by the Epoch times which is a cult anti communist website. Can a source get any better than this?


I stated earlier this was a farce and unreliable source, but where's the fun in that?



posted on Nov, 25 2005 @ 09:34 PM
link   
Wait so if it does happen. Would Taiwan be the prime target?



posted on Nov, 25 2005 @ 09:47 PM
link   

Originally posted by rmatrem
Ramble ramble... blah blah blah.. you clearly missed the point.


I think you clearly missed the point and demonstrated a complete lack of ability in debating your point.

If you disagree, then explain why, rather than resorting to childish banter. If you can't articulate any meaningful post, then I suggest you refrain from posting at all.



posted on Nov, 25 2005 @ 09:49 PM
link   

Originally posted by apc
Well... history certainly does repeat itself.

Despite the fact that I feel the US military is grossly underestimated by these "
Asian officials," I think it should be pointed out that if China did decide to follow in the footsteps of Nazi Germany, the exact same thing would happen:

The rest of the world would unite against them, and crush them.



bingo

china would have to fight the Russians, Tiawanese, Japanese, South Koreans, United States, Possibly all of NATO, (hell all of europe for that matter.

and plus china would have to fight a two front war. fight the russians in the west and the americans in the east. a two front war didnt work out well for hitler.



posted on Nov, 25 2005 @ 10:00 PM
link   
The devil is in the fine print! I copied this from the link.

See the words, believed and verifying.

The following is a transcript of a speech believed to have been given by Mr. Chi Haotian, Minster of Defense and vice-chairman of China’s Central Military Commission. Independently verifying the authorship of the speech is not possible.

This could be someones delusion to start up more worry.

Roper




top topics



 
7
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join