POLITICS: New EPA Rule Allows Testing on Orphans and Mentally Handicapped Children, page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 1 times
Topic started on 24-11-2005 @ 02:19 PM by Halfofone
Recently the EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) proposed a rule titled "Protection For Subjects In Human Research". The EPA wants public comment on the new rule which they say will help protect the public from pesticides, experimental drugs, and other chemical testing. However the OCA (Organic Consumers Association) read through the rules and have pointed out some buried sections that allow mentally handicapped children, orphaned newborns, abused, neglected, and children outside the US, to be tested upon with only the "permission from the institution or guardian in charge of the individual".




www.organicconsumers.org
Public comments are now being accepted by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on its newly proposed federal regulation regarding the testing of chemicals and pesticides on human subjects. On August 2, 2005, Congress had mandated the EPA create a rule that permanently bans chemical testing on pregnant women and children. But the EPA's newly proposed rule, misleadingly titled "Protections for Subjects in Human Research," puts industry profits ahead of children's welfare. The rule allows for government and industry scientists to treat children as human guinea pigs in chemical experiments in the following situations:

1. Children who "cannot be reasonably consulted," such as those that are mentally handicapped or orphaned newborns may be tested on. With permission from the institution or guardian in charge of the individual, the child may be exposed to chemicals for the sake of research.

2. Parental consent forms are not necessary for testing on children who have been neglected or abused.

3. Chemical studies on any children outside of the U.S. are acceptable.



Please visit the link provided for the complete story.


This is absolutely disgusting. They slide this type of stuff in under a bunch of flowery language and double-speak titles like “Protection For Subjects In Human Research” I guess orphans and mentally handicapped do not deserve protection.
Here you can comment on the rules yourself
Tell them how you feel, the last day to comment is Dec 20th, 2005. You can actually make a difference so don’t just reply here, tell the EPA that this is not acceptable in America.
Here is the actual rule proposal (pdf cut and paste)
www.nacua.org...
HTML

The sections that the OCA point out are;
70 FR 53865 26.408(a)
70 FR 53865 26.408(c)
70 FR 53864 26.401 (a)(2)
70 FR 53857

Related News Links:
www.sfgate.com

Related AboveTopSecret.com Discussion Threads:
EPA Looking at Using Tests on People



[edit on 24-11-2005 by Halfofone]


[edit on 24-11-2005 by Halfofone]


reply posted on 9-12-2005 @ 04:50 PM by News Junkie
Originally posted by CoffinFeeder
** Devil's advocate post **

its about time those people became useful.

yeah, stop screaming... some testing can only go so far before it has to be tried out on humans.. actually, it happens right now, its called clinical trials. I'll have to study deeper into the article, but after all the spin and liberal bleeding heart mumbo jumbo is stripped away from it.. could this simply be a push to open up another sector of people for the newer and more experimental prodecures out there that only a select few get to have before its released on teh larger market for gigantic profits?

Its al in how its spun and presented. Evil corporations want to spary acid in the eyes of babies for thinly veiled research or is it knee jerk liberal zealotry ending up having a negative side effect on a populatin of people that might be in need of more, newer and possibly better medicine?

even if this did pass, do you think theres an ethics committee that would even give this a second look if there was anythign even remotely shady about it given the current policital climates?

unfortunately, even if it was for good (not 'the good' or 'the greater good') it probably would be shot down becuase too many cant separate big businesss from supposed evil.
*Bleeding Heart Liberal Commie Pinko Tree-Hugger post*

Over-reacting huh!?!

Well how about testing of drugs that have been PROVED harmful on orphans who were force fed with tubes because they fought against it.

Drugs that caused the death of most of the organs of the body including the liver and the skin (skin being an organ).

And how about the media cover up and witch hunt conducted against the investigator who revealed the practice - in SPITE of the fact that he produced IRREFUTABLE eveidence of it.

The link is below - do you have the stomach to read it and view the photographic evidence of what these drugs did then come back and tell us we are over-reacting?

Warning: Graphic images of human suffering contained in link:
Forced drugging of Black and Latino children at the Incarnation Children's Center (ICC)

[edit on 9-12-2005 by News Junkie]

[edit on 9-12-2005 by News Junkie]
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



Russian scientists reach buried Antarctic Lake Vostok
  Posted 7 days ago with 83 member flags
Monsanto quits as GM results announced (EUROPE)
  Posted 8 days ago with 72 member flags
Renowned Geophysicist Says Strange Sky Sounds Are Real
  Posted 1 days ago with 72 member flags
Strange noises reported around North Battleford
  Posted 19 days ago with 67 member flags
Ayatollah: Kill all Jews, annihilate Israel
  Posted 7 days ago with 49 member flags