RAF Machrihanish Aurora Spyplane, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 3 times


reply posted on 29-11-2005 @ 05:26 PM by Browno
Try this site

www.dreamlandresort.com...

Maybe this 'Aurora' is an XB-70 with the fuselage shortened leaving it the shape of a triangle


reply posted on 3-1-2007 @ 09:39 AM by Military_History_guy
I don't even think that Navy Seals had anything at all to do with the security at RAF Macrahanish. Just remember that Special Warfare Units of any kind do not guard military facilities. Do you ever see SAS or SBS troops guarding military installations? These guys are much more of an asset that any security guard. One of the biggest things to think about about the security of RAF Machrahanish is the RAF bit, it belongs to the MoD and would be guarded by MoD and RAF Police. No matter who is based or stationed there, even the American bases in East Anglia belong to the MoD and come under British law, even though this caused some concern during the 1960's and also the 1980's with the basing of US nuclear weapons in this country.

Not to sure about the 'Assault team' theory, remember that if the 'Cold War' went hot these facilities would have been guarded by home defence troops both regular and TA. Facilities such as RNAD Coulport and the Faslane Complex would and are guarded by Royal Marines and also MoD Police. Not to sure about the 'many' nuclear facilities in central scotland, apart from the two above there was only three nuclear sites active during the 'Cold War', which were nuclear reactors, though I believe the one at Chapel Cross was actually run by the MoD for Uranium enrichment. The 'Assault team' theory could also be dismissed due to the nature of conflict that the UK/NATO would have been involved in. The Warsaw Pact forces would have been more interested in destroying NATO military forces and facilities rather that other nuclear facilities. This of course would have been turned around if it was to become a long conventional war and of course this would lead to a war of attrition and the attempted destruction of civilian infrastructure. In that case airstrikes would be the first choice and if this would have thought not to be feasible the use of Spetsnaz or even KGB 'sleeper' agents could be used. If these would have been used the destruction rather than the capture of the facility would have been the primary objective. This could have been done by the use of a 'briefcase' or 'backpack' low yield nuclear device. The only other option with a SEAL assault team would be the possibility of a terror group capturing a civil nuclear facility, but again this would more than likely be not the case due to the UK's own Special Air Service counter-revolutionary warfare unit at Stirling Lines, Hereford, who would more than likely undertake the task.

[edit on 3-1-2007 by Military_History_guy]

[edit on 3-1-2007 by Military_History_guy]


reply posted on 14-8-2008 @ 11:37 AM by Anonymous ATS
reply to post by jeffers


I was stationed at RAF Machrihanish. It was not USAF protecting any part of that base. RAF Police were in charge of security. There were three sites controlled by american forces...none of them were controlled by USAF. All were USN. The "Gaydon" Hangar is actually the Gaylon hangar. I can assure you...having been inside it several times...there is nothing sinister or mysterious about it.


reply posted on 14-8-2008 @ 11:47 AM by CaptGizmo
I was wondering if this is what the OP saw



It is very contoured body style and it does not look like conventional aircraft for the most part.Here is a video of it in flight.




[edit: fixed video link]

[edit on 14-8-2008 by 12m8keall2c]


reply posted on 9-9-2008 @ 08:16 PM by Anonymous ATS
reply to post by Englishman_in_Spain



hey just checked in today on MILITARY web. AIR FORCE is displaying its PULSE DETONATING ENGINE at WRIGHT PATTERSON AFB MUSEUM. the picture and explanation dont match. I guess until you see the file pic they put out there, there is NO WAY that little toy plane can fly at 4 times the speed of sound leaving little puffs of smoke behind. AURORA is much more then their "display". still shy, arent they.


reply posted on 10-9-2008 @ 05:11 AM by stratsys-sws
reply to post by Anonymous ATS



Ahhh another example of why not to allow Anon posts, arrghhh....but that's for another thread I suppose.

If he supposedly worked there he would know that the hangar is called the Gaydon hangar not because that's it's allocated name, it would have a number rather than a name, but because the Gaydon hangar is a type of hangar found all over the UK. They were first built during the second world war and you still find them on many military bases!

So.....he's another wannabee and you can discount all of the 'facts' he's posted!

Cheers

Robbie
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>    ^^TOP^^



Bob Lear on Brad Meltzers Decoded - UFO\'s
  Posted 12 days ago with 6 member flags
Bob Lazar\'s W-2
  Posted 7 days ago with 6 member flags
AREA 51 - Activity CAUGHT on (Fact or Faked Paranormal Files Show)
  Posted 17 days ago with 5 member flags
Underground base right in the heart of Portland, OR
  Posted 10 days ago with 5 member flags
"Images of Aviation - Area 51 - Peter Merlin"
  Posted 9 days ago with 4 member flags
Current generation military base video surveillance
  Posted 8 days ago with 4 member flags
Groom Lake night panorama circa 2003
  Posted 5 days ago with 4 member flags
Creech AFB comm changes
  Posted 7 days ago with 3 member flags