It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
He confessed shortly after his arrest. That doesn't leave a lot of time for whipping and torture, does it?
Originally posted by Souljah
When tortured, the victim will admit to wearing Ping Thongs as the Underwear, just to STOP the Torture. Even Police Evidence does not COUNT in Court, if Beaten out of the Suspect.
Torture Evidence is Unacceptable
Originally posted by Seekerof
Accordingly, Souljah, being that Abu Ali admitted to being Al-Qaeda, your assertion and his being Al-Qaeda, adds up to and calls this [linked below] into play:
This is al-Qa'eda Rule 18: 'You must claim you were tortured'
seekerof
Originally posted by GradyPhilpott
Here is the al Qaeda training manual for those who would like to puruse it at their leisure.
www.usdoj.gov...
Originally posted by TheShroudOfMemphis
Ha, thanks for posting that.
Now i see how "al-Qaeda" linked groups always have the 'manual' on their computers or person when they are busted - they get it from Justice Department!
As for another Arab "John Smith" being convicted of 'conspiracy of terrorism' in a country that uses torture and beheadings (which are totally out of vogue right now), yeah wow, great stuff. I'm sure that will do heaps in the 'War on Terror'. It's easily worth more as propaganda but none the less, it's a warm blanket isn't it?
He confessed shortly after his arrest. That doesn't leave a lot of time for whipping and torture, does it?
Originally posted by jsobecky
The sentiment throughout this thread seems to be that these terrorists should be tried in the Vatican. Then if they are found guilty, their sentence could equal penance - something like "Recite the Lord's Prayer five times and gimme ten Hail Marys. Then get outta here, you knucklehead!"
Originally posted by sardion2000
The Saudi's are notoriously brutal so I've been
told(by Another Saudi) so reputation of ruthlessness
can break some weaker people quite easily just with
a few words.....
from ShakyaHeir The sentiment you're referring to comes out of the fact that president George W. Bush is the real terrorist, and that the people who died on 9/11 were actually killed by him. Al Qaeda is the Emmanuel Golstein of our age. The "war on terror" is meant to keep you scared, unquestioning, and willing to give up the freedoms that protect you in the name of "security". If we weren't at war and we didn't have an enemy lurking in the shadows to be afraid of we might start examining what's wrong with American society (there's a lot), but instead we're distracted by the drum-beat of war.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
This alleged manual looks more like Skull and Bones type paraphernalia with 'leader' or 'God' changed to Allah - for effect.
Originally posted by GradyPhilpott
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
This alleged manual looks more like Skull and Bones type paraphernalia with 'leader' or 'God' changed to Allah - for effect.
Can you cite any example of Skull and Bones "paraphernalia" that even resembles this manual?
The manual only presents a concrete form what is a well known modus operandi of al Qaeda, nothing more nothing less.
It does not matter if the 'Al-Qaida' manual talks about this or not. If the US was clean, and did not torture anybody, then those claims would be meaningless. However, since people in US custody are tortured, those claims have weight, without regard to whether A-Q trains in that or not.
Originally posted by Open_Minded Skeptic
If the US was squeaky clean as regards torture, i.e. if Pres. Bush was telling the truth that 'we do not torture', then this guy's confession might be sufficient to convict him.
Originally posted by jsobecky
from ShakyaHeir The sentiment you're referring to comes out of the fact that president George W. Bush is the real terrorist, and that the people who died on 9/11 were actually killed by him. Al Qaeda is the Emmanuel Golstein of our age. The "war on terror" is meant to keep you scared, unquestioning, and willing to give up the freedoms that protect you in the name of "security". If we weren't at war and we didn't have an enemy lurking in the shadows to be afraid of we might start examining what's wrong with American society (there's a lot), but instead we're distracted by the drum-beat of war.
Unless you mean in some byzantine twisted-philosophical kind of way that Bush killed the people on 9/11, I must say farewell to that line of talk.