It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
DAY 2 of Operation "Blue Ribbon"
Morning came with a bang, literally, as a sonic boom woke us from our sleep. We figured that was a good sign for the day and got moving. With some fresh coffee digesting nicely, we stepped outside into the crisp air and looked up. To our joy, a pair of F-22 Raptors were dog fighting overhead. We watched as they flew around using the vectored thrust to make incredibly tight turns into each other. They were either using a smoke system to show their flight path, or were using the contrail suppression system we had heard about. Their contrails would turn on and off at precise times, almost as if they would use them to visually acquire each other and then shut them off and commence the fight. All three of us being pilots, we especially enjoyed this free air show. Soon the F-22s left and we saw an F-15 pop over the ridge from Area 51 and make a low pass over the town at around 1000 AGL. We waited for anything else cool to happen, but while there was a lull in the aerial entertainment, the smell of bacon crossed over from the restaurant and we willingly heeded its call.
Originally posted by Seekerof
I ran across a rather humorous mention in a fairly academic article.
The article makes reference to a couple of Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University folks observing a pair of F-22s dog-fighting, and, get this, mention of an alleged contrail suppression system, insinuating that the couple of F-22s dog-fighting were using contrail generators.
Simply amazing, coming from Embry Riddle folks who certainly would know better, eh?
Anyhow, anyone think or believe otherwise?
Does the F-22 have the option to equip smoke/contrail generators and can they be simply switched off and on?
Originally posted by Zaphod58
Whether they have one or not isn't known, but what the Embry-Riddle folks SHOULD HAVE known is that it is quite possible to form contrails simply by pulling high G manuvers. There are plenty of other reasons for contrails to be formed in the way they described other than contrail generators/suppressors.
Originally posted by Seekerof
billybob....apparently you believe that the dueling F-22s were creating contrails because they were using some super-duper smoke/contrail generator, that can be switched on and off?
Other than your critique of my opinion of those decorated Embry Riddle aeronautical students/observors, your direct imput into this topic was what, exactly?
seekerof
Originally posted by billybob
it looks like these impartial observers watched aircraft voluntarily switching their contrails on and off, who am i to argue with the expert witnesses that observed it?
Originally posted by Seekerof
Originally posted by billybob
it looks like these impartial observers watched aircraft voluntarily switching their contrails on and off, who am i to argue with the expert witnesses that observed it?
Apparently, one not knowledged in aircraft and how contrails are formed?
Thats the point of this topic: you have a couple of Embry Riddle aeronautical folks, "experts" as you have asserted, that should know better. Did you?
seekerof
[edit on 21-11-2005 by Seekerof]