It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Britguy
So, a question, why would Iran launch a nookular device against Israel, knowing that Israel will launch missiles, probably from it's subs, to turn Iran into a radioactive parking lot?
Originally posted by Britguy
You missed a step in there somewhere... the one about having nookular armed missiles?
So, a question, why would Iran launch a nookular device against Israel, knowing that Israel will launch missiles, probably from it's subs, to turn Iran into a radioactive parking lot?
Originally posted by thermopolis
The short answer is a massive EMP strike over both Israel and the US. Sometime ago there was a post about one of the USSR "stans" selling cruse missle to Iran and China.
Interesting that they "lied" again isn't it.
Step one............ use spy sat to find targets.
Step two ..........launch second and third sat so you have GPS capability over Israel.
Step three Launch nukes..........................
Step 2-1/2..............US and Israel turn Tehran into glass............
Originally posted by KhieuSamphan
Because they are ALL inherently illogical imbeciles, you silly billy!!!
Originally posted by thermopolis
Interesting that they "lied" again isn't it.
Originally posted by jdelta99
lWhat would stop their gov't from authorising another strike but this time against multiple targets in Iran due to the same reasons? The threat is there and real, from the Iran gov't itself!......just the distance and fuel holds the Isreali's back.
Something or someone is stopping them or atleast holding them back.
Originally posted by Britguy
You missed a step in there somewhere... the one about having nookular armed missiles?
So, a question, why would Iran launch a nookular device against Israel, knowing that Israel will launch missiles, probably from it's subs, to turn Iran into a radioactive parking lot?
Originally posted by sal88
Originally posted by thermopolis
Interesting that they "lied" again isn't it.
Are you sure about that? He said it had the capabilities to spy on Israel, he didn't say that's what it was used for.
Oh yeah! This seems completly crazy for a country that recruits suicide bombers.
Originally posted by Sep
Question:
I am not very good when it comes to these things, but doesn’t Iran already have the Shahab 3, which can travel to any spot on Israel? So if Iran were planning a WMD attack on the Jewish state, why would they need a satellite, seeing how lately with the help of the Chinese they have lowered the CEP to less than 100m? Do nuclear missiles really have to be THAT accurate?If they had a nuclear warhead and planned to use it they would have done so already, since they haven’t, I see no use for a satellite other than a political move to satisfy their population.
As for a nuclear attack many names can be given to the Iranian leadership, but suicidal is not one of them. The person who has to call for an attack before it takes place is Khamenei, a multi-millionaire who lives in the former monarch's palace. Logic dictates that if a person were planning a suicidal move, they would not go into business and be interested in money. Second person in charge in Iran is Rafsanjani. He is a multi-billionaire. Same story applies to him. Hence I don’t think an attack is about to happen although I have to hand it to the media and the government, after Iraq, this has probably been one of the best-organized scare campaigns in recent history.
Originally posted by American Mad Man
You have to know where to shoot your missles.
Without strategic recon assets, what good is a nuke? You won't have any targets besides known military bases and cities. In a nuclear first strike, the oobject is to destroy as much of the enemies retalitory weapons as you can. Hence, a single sat looking down on a tiny nation like Isreal is just what you would need to find their nuclear bunkers.
They would need nukes first, and by the time that happens (if they do aquire them), they would most likely have different leadership.