It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Egg Mundane
I would like to hear from people about how you are practicing anarchy in your communities...
Originally posted by cavscout
I ignore traffic signs and I have 4 cats and 2 dogs (law says 3 walking pets.)
I am so bad!
[edit on 4-12-2005 by cavscout]
Originally posted by Egg Mundane
I would like to hear from people about how you are practicing anarchy in your communities...
Originally posted by coerciblegerm
urinate on every public building
Guns. Lots of big, scary guns. With no government to guarantee that victims will be disarmed a thug never knows when someone is going to light him up.
but what will stop someone else from using their own power over another in an abusive or otherwise detrimental way? For that matter, in an anarchistic society, what stops any individual or group of individuals from doing the same?
Friend, I can explain to you how any system now in place can see its intended result realized in a minarchist (or anarchist, if you wish) state.
The ideology of anarchism is not suited for application........but is ultimately unable to provide a realistic alternative.
No, however one must criticize the state to be an anarchist.
One need not be an anarchist to criticize the state.
Originally posted by coerciblegerm
The ideology of anarchism is not suited for application. Rather, it is a theoretical construct of what a utopian society could look like. As such, it is capable of leveling criticism at the state in its various forms, but is ultimately unable to provide a realistic alternative
Posted by the Anarchist International Information Service website www.anarchy.no:
The word anarchism origins from the word anarchy, also an old Greek word. [...] is the following: The prefix "an" means "negation of", as in anaerobe vs aerobe, anandrous vs -androus, anhydride vs hydride, etc; i.e. "an" means without what is mentioned in the suffix, but keeping what is essential in the matter. The suffix "archy" means "rule (not rules or law), ruler, rulers, superior in contrast to subordinates, etc.", from Greek "archein", "to rule, to be first"; and "archos", "ruler" i.e. in a coercive, repressive, etc. manner, slavery and tyranny included. As mentioned "an" means without what is mentioned in the suffix, but keeping what is essential in the matter, i.e. in this case management in the meaning of coordination, but without ruling. Thus, anarchy means coordination and management without ruling and thus rulers.
And thus anarchy means coordination, without rule from the bureaucracy broadly defined, the economical and/or political/administrative superiors in private and public sectors (in contrast to the people), down towards the bottom, i.e. in a coercive, repressive manner. b) and thus,"anarchy" is higher forms of economical and political/adminstrative democracy; 1. ideally, i.e. 100% anarchy; meaning 100% coordination on equal footing, without superiors and subordinates, horizontal organization, and co-operation without coercion, or 2. practically, significant i.e. more than 50% degree of anarchy, i.e. more horizontally than vertically organized, i.e. more influence on the societal management from the "bottom upwards", than from the bureaucracy, from "the top downwards to the bottom".
I can vow to refrain from exercising whatever power or control I have over an individual, but what will stop someone else from using their own power over another in an abusive or otherwise detrimental way? For that matter, in an anarchistic society, what stops any individual or group of individuals from doing the same?
Originally posted by Egg Mundane
Hello...I would liketo hear from any fellow anarchists. There are so many anarchistic groups around. I would like to hear from people about how you are practicing anarchy in your communities...
Originally posted by cavscout
me_ofef_seraph, what you describe is not anarchy, no matter how many communists/socialists say it is. Anarcho-syndicalism is not anarchism.
It is simple; you can not outlaw private ownership of a factory in an anarchist society.
Anarcho-syndicalism maintains that a government (call it what you want, it will be a government) that outlaws the private ownership of assets is anarchy. You cannot force your will on others through a government, even a direct democracy, and claim to have an anarchist system
Minarchists are those who feel that an extremely limited government would best serve the people. While in a minarchist state court, fire and police services would be run by a government, everything else would not, and the very small government would not butt-in to one's life so long as they were not directly harming anyone.
An Anarcho-Capitalist is an Anarchist.
An Anarcho-syndicalist is not.
A Minarchist is an extreme Libertarian.
Minarchism is extreme Libertarianism
Originally posted by Beelzebubba
IAlas, the human race needs to learn alot more about respect before any kind of utopian society can be found.
Originally posted by coerciblegerm
One can choose to ignore all traffic signals in a particular area, urinate on every public building, engage in physical altercations with law enforcement officials, or otherwise do anything illegal. The fact remains that you run the risk of traffic accidents, fines, physical injury, jail time, or death by doing anything of this nature.
I can vow to refrain from exercising whatever power or control I have over an individual, but what will stop someone else from using their own power over another in an abusive or otherwise detrimental way? For that matter, in an anarchistic society, what stops any individual or group of individuals from doing the same?
The ideology of anarchism is not suited for application. Rather, it is a theoretical construct of what a utopian society could look like. As such, it is capable of leveling criticism at the state in its various forms, but is ultimately unable to provide a realistic alternative.
One need not be an anarchist to criticize the state. The best alternative to Anarchism, or any 'ism' really, is to do one simple thing:
Deny Ignorance.
Originally posted by Majic
Majic's Political Easter Egg: Be the first to post the official name of the "First International" in this thread and send Majic a U2U with a link to your post, and you will be awarded 500 PTS points.
Originally posted by Durden
International Workingmen's Association.