Oh boy, so much to do when these guys get all stirred up.
Well, let me throw a few things out there in no particular order.
Regarding duplication of the photos, only a complete fool would try to state that either IIG or Ritzmann duplicated Meier's photos - simply because
they won't submit them to the same analysis, done by competent scientists, that authenticated Meier's. Obviously, the hapless characters at
CFI-West/IIG would have jumped at the opportunity to prove that they could duplicate more than the "effect" of Meier's photos, as would Ritzmann,
if he could as well.
It's kinda, almost, sort of funny that they have nothing even remotely as convincing as the photos at www.tjresearch.info...
those lovely reflections gleaming in what's OBVIOUSLY a full-sized craft right next to a full-sized tree for comparison. But you guys are into denial
and kidding yourselves so I'll bet you will actually attempt to rationalize that away.
Now regarding the sound analysis, I've put the questions you posed out to people more well informed about that part of the investigation and report
back when I get the answers, since I am not the author of the report but, just for the record, are you claiming that Robin L. Shellman, steve Ambrose
and Nils Rognerud also didn't exist, weren't capable sound engineers and or falsified their reports on the sounds? Do you say hte same thing
regarding Michael Malin, Robert Post, Eric Eliason, David Froning, Wally Gentleman, Nippon TV, etc.?
And as for "game over, etc.", does that mean that you and/or any of the other armchair experts here are going to duplicate the sounds for us,
outside under the same conditions and with the same equipment and produce the same results that Meier did? After posting his little photos perhaps
Ritzmann will whip out those rusty amps and show us how it was really done, we're all waiting I'm sure. By the way, since he mentions his
photographs and films, I wonder if he'd be/have been offered $1,000,000 by Universal for his ability to make "sapce ship films" as Meier was by
them (and two other studios). I know, I know "who said he was this and who said that, etc.?"
And really, I mean REALLY, are you guys so much in denial that you don't recognize that information published in copyrighted books, unalterable
documents and even my little DVD ($25 plus $4 shipping and, specially for you guys, a debunker's tax of an infinite amount that I can't even
reproduce here) constitute PROOF that it was indeed published BEFORE the foretold, specific events occurred or do you have another twist on reality
even more spectacular than Meier's evidence itself?
As for MUFON, contact them yourselves and be sure to tell them that you've solved the "hoax". After all, they're an organization long opposed to
the Meier case and should be very sympathetic to your brilliant arguments. You ccan also ask them about the size of the crowd, level of interest and
how many remained, etc. And yes, I do suggest that intelligent people who are presented with evidence, proof, logic, common sense, etc. can, over a
2-hour period, actually begin to change their rpejudiced opinions...but I doubt that either Ritzmann or IIG's pictures would hold their attention for
very long. Give it a try though...if you want to put your money where your mouths are.
And no, making dumbnuts statements such as, "The pictures -- hoaxed. IIGwest, jritzmann, and others have proven that using the same equipment as
Meier, his photos were easily reproduced. Some of the photos were pictures taken off TV shows, others were pictures of paintings.
The metal -- hoaxed (yes, Meier combined melted solder with ground-up crystals he either bought or found and let it solidify to make the "metal",
the crystals were just interesting crystals that Meier found -- he must have liked the monazite crystal he found, because he ground down some of it to
mix with the solder)
The sound analysis -- fabricated. The source of the sound may remain a mystery, but your analysis is clearly flawed. The sound could, quite easily,
have been recorded from a commercial source. The witnesses? You have no proof that any ever existed," obivously doesn't make it so, especially since
it's simply wrong and unsubstantiated.
You must have an AWFUL lot investied in some way to be trying to obfuscate as much as you do. But as they used to say in the music biz, the hits just
keep on coming and, so far with nearly 4 million people around the world looking in on the case, not all of whom I'm sure simply accept it, no one
has offered proof of a hoax...just like you guys.
Bu perhaps a little diversionary contemplation is appropriate here. It goes like this.
Let's say that a guy, it could even be one of you intellectual giants, made the claim that ETs were visiting him. When pressed for proof he offered
none but he still kept making the claim. Wouldn't it be reasonable to expect him to provide proof for it? What would reasonable proof be? Would it be
an irreproducible photograph, 5 photos, 10, 100, 300, 700, more than 1,200?
What about a film, or 2, 4, 7 or 9 films? How's about a still irreproducible video? What if he claimed to have recorded the sounds once, twice, three
times, four times? Would that be enough...especially if they too were irreproducible? And if this guy wasn't the only one to see or photograph or
record the sounds of the ships, how many credible witnesses would it take, one, 10, 15, 30, 80, 120+?
How many would have to pass lie detector tests besides hm, 3, 5, 9, 13, 15?
And if this guy also had metal alloy samples, and if a top level, genius of a scientist videotaped a lengthy analysis of the alloys and deemed them
irreproducible and beyond terrestrial technology, might that not be worthy of consideration?
And if a physicist who'd been in the aerospace-defense industry for 25 years likewise took the man's information and evidence seriously, along with
a number of other credible scientists...might not the man's detractors be seen to be suffering from a terminal case of sour grapes, jealousy and
And if this man also produced volumes of prophetically accurate information, easily confirmed by anyone with a computer and the abilty to think (I'm
not intentionally trying to leave any of you out here but, hey, s**p happens) that stood on its own merit even without hte ET/UFO evidence, might that
not be of stellar importance to anyone but Luddites and religiously addicted skeptics?
Well, fellas, the few of you here who are obviously getting ulcers over the fact that a one-armed guy has effectively tied you all up in knots must be
having quite a time of it. I mean, there's isn't one among you whose life will be the subject of this much interest, psecualtion, controversy - and
value to humanity in the long run but WITHOUT you guys, and your small-minded ilk throughout history, life just wouldn't be this much fun, now would
I mean what would Galileo have done without the church of his day, like you guys and yours today? How could we possibly imagine a world in which
jealous, narrow minded people strenuously avoid the cynical, irrational, denial of facts despite their overwhelming preponderance? But unless you can
do a lot better than you have, your relevance will be limited to entertaining mainly likeminded late night computer addicts, at least up unitl the
point that few of them start looking at the case themselves and start thinking for themselves, as it appears that people around the world are now
doing in consistently growing numbers.
So, as I said, I'll get back to you with the sound report info as soon as I get it but in the meantime keep ranting and remember...there's also the
seven-fingered handprints, still etched into the surface of the car in Switzerland to account for. However, knowing how loathe you guys are to invest
in anything informative about the case, I doubt that we'll be seeing your sorry, chair bound butts over there anytime soon to "debunk" them.
Y'all have a real good weekend and try to keep your collective blood pressure under control.