Billy Meier called the New Nostradamus!?!?, page 1

I would like to make a general reply to the questions raised here since the interview on WTOP was with me. First, the reason that the interview was conducted was that Meier predicted the unrest, arson and riots in France (and the fact that it would be the inhabitants of a diffferent religion, "specifically Islam") on two occasions. The first was in 1981, and the second in 1987. I first read the 1981 prediction in 1986 and the ones from 1987 (which also contained the forewarning re the WTC) in 2002. Perhaps more importantly, since you don't need to take my word for it, I reported on it on my DVD, which was released in 2004, more than a 1 1/2 years BEFORE the events occurred. Of course, there are numerous other items on the DVD, or updated at www.theyfly.com for free, that easily confirm both the accuracy and authenticity of the predicitions, as well as the case and Meier's claims of ongoing extraterrestrial contact.

The REAL "mind-boggling" story here is how and why the Meier case has been supressed by the media (and government) for decades and why people who offer their quick dismissals and cheap opinions are so woefully uninformed of the very well-documented facts in this case.

Having spent more than 26 years researching the case, and doing so because I had 2,000 pages of Meier information in 1986 with specific items foretold (including the French riots) that didn't begin to occur or be discovered until 1988, I now KNOW that the case is true and authentic...but I can't say that all the information is true simply because much of it refers to events in the very distant past or future events that haven't occurred yet and/or may not occur. But so far what I've been able to test through internet searches, etc. (which weren't available to rural-dwelling Meier in the 1950s on up) has checked out impeccably.

I would be willing to again address this issue here if there is interest in it but only with people who will trouble themselves to do their homework...like David Burd of WTOP did and others are now doing. There is a fair amount of info freely available at www.theyfly.com. And if anyone really wants to view the Marcel Vogel metal alloy analysis or hear some of the other scientists who examined Meier's evidence speak about it we have videos, books, CDs, DVD, etc.

A couple of other things, the top professional skeptics tried and failed to duplicate any of Meier's photographic evidence...so will you if you wish to try. And you won't be able to duplicate the sound recordings either (free download at my site) or the video or the new seven-fingered handprints.

Next, regarding the "thing on a string" comment, ignorant as it was of the facts:

From: UFO Contact from the Pleiades
A Preliminary Investigation Report

Copyrights 1982, 1982, 1980, 1979, 1978 Wendelle C. Stevens

"For analysis of the moving picture sequences of the Pleiadian spacecraft filmed in color in super 8mm format by Eduard Meier we turned to Mr. Jun-Ichi Yaoi of Tokyo, Japan, a world recognized expert in the film and television industry, now working as an officer in Nippon Television Corporation.

In the 18 March sequence Meier filmed the spacecraft circling a large tree in front of a farmhouse. The sky was overcast with a low ceiling, and occasionally light snowflakes fell. The motion of the spacecraft looks suspiciously like it is tethered from above as it appears to circle the tree and then to swing back and forth over the tree, except that on three occasions the spacecraft changes its motion abruptly with no change in the tilt of the vertical axis of the ship. If it was in fact tethered, one would expect the vertical axis to tilt as the tether point above was moved. In another measurement it was found that the tilt angle of the vertical axis in one oscillation sequence was sufficient that the axis crossed within the frame and would have put the tether point within the picture. No tether point source was revealed, in one of the final oscillation sequences the object appeared to pass directly over the top of the tree, and it is clearly seen that the tree was swept over in the direction of the spacecraft, or appeared to follow the spacecraft as it passed. Clearly no model could have produced this effect. When we revisited the scene we found that the tree had died and was cut down."

I will be interested to see if there is serious and intelligent interest in the case on this forum and, if so, you'll get as much respectful response form me as time permits.

Best,

Michael Horn
Authorized American Media Representative
The Billy Meier Contacts
www.theyfly.com