kick ass vid.. Nice 1

I'm 50/50 on this one...

I am a believer BTW not a skeptic..

But if you look real close in the beginning of the video, it looks as if it is bouncing up and down. Which leads me to believe it was on a 'tight string' between the two balconies.

Also if you were there video taping this, would you stand where that person was or would you walk out on the sidewalk to get a better view?

looks real to me.

but just goes to show. that even if it wer real, Most people would just say
CGI , photoshop ect ect.

it could be real you never know.

When you think about some of the movies where special effects have been used and you don't even realize it, the CGI idea sounds very good. It would be nice to see a ufo sighting where no one can come up with a rational explanation. Like if there were thousands of people wathcing an object move around in the sky and news crews there then i might believeit. I was really hoping this one was real but I'm still not off the fence on this one yet.

Originally posted by Magickesists
Like if there were thousands of people wathcing an object move around in the sky and news crews there then i might believeit.

you mean like the ones in mexico

I thought this one was classified as a Hoax?

But hell, nowadays they even say your family is a hoax....
They can classify everything as a hoax or a fake, even if it is real...

Me myself..i never trust a vid that is as clear as this, and the guy taping it remaining this calm...






[edit on 6-3-2006 by Dutch_Rick]

Originally posted by noslenwerd

Originally posted by Magickesists
Like if there were thousands of people wathcing an object move around in the sky and news crews there then i might believeit.

you mean like the ones in mexico

Those mexico video's are intense.

I haven't seen the mexico vidoes, but my last post was made because i had come to and interesting hypothetical situation.

What if the scientists in dr wo ho lee's lab and such were using dimensional travel things and doing a feild test ,therefore the clarity and preknowledge of were the "UFO' is going.

Because it was a feild test of alien technology!

Originally posted by scientia
i think the most interesing thing about the video is the sound. Right when the craft speeds up and bolts out of view, you hear a swift woosh as if a thin piece of plastic or a magazine was swept by your ear. It might be the sound barrier being broken in that split second. Im just interested in that because ive never heard something like that in a u.f.o video

Prior to that it also appears to be making a whistling sound which is incredibly eerie. My gut reaction is that it is genuine; however i am also wary about unsolicited videos coming out of eastern european countries and all that that implies.

I have seen a very similar video taken from someone's porch in gulf breeze - it was stationary and then shot off.

Originally posted by Briggs
looks real to me.

but just goes to show. that even if it wer real, Most people would just say
CGI , photoshop ect ect.

it could be real you never know.

Spot on mate. People are far too cynical these days, but that's probably thanks to all the hoax cases we hear about.

You didn't click on the link did ya?

If you had you would have seen that it was a replacement balloon for a RC Saucer Blimp...

And it looks just like what was in the video...

Originally posted by iamian
Plus the lack of info, doesn't help the believability.

Without corroborating evidence, it's just an interesting piece of video. Let's go through the list again. In order for it to be worth anything other than (entertaining) crap we need:

* A video that is more than 10 seconds long. Why not 20 minutes?
* Names, times, places where this supposedly happened.
* Other stuff, including physical evidence.
* Piece of technology unknown on Earth.
* More than one or two witnesses.
* Verification by government and independent sources.
* Alien - Dead okay, live even better.
* 24-hour coverage on CNN.

Until you get this, it's all blah blah blah cool video fakery.

i have the same video but with much better quality.... and it's really amazing
I think it's true.

I always wondered on the Bulgaria UFO, it sort of looks CGI but as said before, you can never be sure as some things in movies appear to be genuine but are actually CGI.


The Mexico Sightings..once in a lifetime, it's like the feeling you get from looking up on a clear night and seeing a comet streak across the sky or watching a meteor shower.

I really wish more people took interest in it :-/

It's plainly a hoax. I have no agenda here, I was impressed forst time I saw it, but look again. Look closely at the ship and the clouds behind it. They move independently of one another (as I said in the last thread about it). The guy simply filmed a bit of sky, whacked it through his PC and superimposed a model over it. The thing is, he's obviously an amateur because he doesn't get the tracking right. At the supposed distance from the camera, the ship wouldn't be 'jerking' against the clouds. There are two films, one superimposed over the other.

So, a hoax. And a damn poor one at that.

Im no expert but from what a few people have said:

Q Why didnt the cameraman move to get a better shot?
A Because he was on a balcony the same as the ones you can see on the right

Q why such poor quality?
A Because in bulgaria they can't afford fantastic cameras and it was probably quite old

Q Why no sound and so compressed?
A Because their computer probably isn't brilliant either and its quicker to upload it if it's a smaller file.

Q Why did they zoom in then out?
A because if theyre anything like me, they like zooming and then they think about the quality getting crap and zoom back out again

I think its pretty convincing and theres no way there was string involved

As for CGI, maybe, but given the camera used and my opinion on the reson for the low quality, sureley if they were going to digitally edit it they would have better equipment. Unless its a double bluff kinda thing...