Creationism: where is the evidence? Seriously. No, really, where is it?, page 2

Creationism: where is the evidence? Seriously. No, really, where is it?, page 2

Pages: << 1 2 >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times

reply posted on 16-11-2005 @ 10:02 PM by Zipdot

Yeah, matt seems to be hesitant to commit to an opinion on this, but I'm not. Radiocarbon dating is considered to be a viable dating method to around 60,000 years, and is considered accurate to within ~150 years, if used correctly (i.e., the correct samples are tested in a correct manner). I agree with this outlook. C14 dating demonstrations have correctly coincided with known ages for certain historical artifacts.

Zip

Pages: << 1 2 >> ^^TOP^^

Ex-Vatican Translator, Mauro Biglino\'s Alternative Creation/Translation Theory
Posted 12 days ago with 40 member flags

"I was raised an atheist"- Professor František Vyskočil
Posted 9 days ago with 6 member flags

Radical Theory Explains the Origin, Evolution, and Nature of Life, Challenges Conventional Wisdom
Posted 18 days ago with 3 member flags

Please be more specific about which type of creationist you\'re speaking of...
Posted 18 days ago with 2 member flags

Proof that the pharoes did not build the pyramids, so who did FIND OUT HERE
Posted 16 days ago with 2 member flags

The meaning or point of existence or life
Posted 13 days ago with 2 member flags

Sand Castles and Science
Posted 11 days ago with 2 member flags

What is the meaning of the Universe if there were no humans/sentient beings?
Posted 13 days ago with 1 member flags