How can you ask a person to answer a question and then, at the same time, strip that person of the foundations that their argument is built upon.
You, "Give me proof of evolution without the aid of science." So, what's first? First we must define this very fluid and, more often than not,
Evolution means, "A continuing process of change from one state or condition to another or from one form to another."
Now, here is a question, "If evolution is true then how did it start?" Was it the "Big Bang" that started the evolutionary process? Or, is there a
supernateral answer for evolution or creationism? And last but not least, Is there a scientific answer?
Before answering any of the above questions you must see how Religion and science can not be combined to get an answer for how the world was created.
The world "evolution" it self has nothing to do with a grand architect or creator, of anykind. It simply means that "Sample A" lives for "X"
amount of years and then accidently turns into "Sample A prime"
And also, when G-d to created the world and everything in it He did so without evolution PERIOD. If you would like a further discussion on this then
Please E-Mail me Bakerstone16@hotmail.com
Now, to answering the questions. (-trumpet noises- Dum Dum Duumm)
1.) The Big Bang Theory-(In brief)
there is nothing in all of existence PERIOD.(if there was then how did it get there? By G-d Maybe!!!!)
Now. wait, there is something, and wait again, there seems to be two somethings. They're headed right for each other.... BOOOOOMMM.... They hit and
what do you know EARTH has been created.
molecules and so forth just happen to spontaneously appear on Earth.
these molecules then happen to gain more complex DNA combinations out of thin air. (how can something gain anything from nothing? CAN'T HAPPEN!)
Now look, we have ape like creatures. WOW
ohh, these ape like creatures are... are ... are, looking like a man like being, even more amazing.
now look, what do we have now? MAN, Yeah!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Even though this theory means that everything that has ever happened is an accident, lets suppose that it means that there is order.
if so, then it would make sense to say that the weaker molecules dies and only the strong survive. It would also be logical to say that we can use
accurate methods to date such things. For instance Carbon dating, it's only accurate up to around 6000 years, because of the halflife of carbon that
can be traced in a fossil. But what about those things that are over 6000 years old how could we date these things? I know, lets try Radioactive
dating, its fairly accurate. It is normally only off by about + or - 150 million years. Ohh... Ohh... Ohh.. how about just leaving the dating alone
and trying to find better ways of proving evolution? Okay, but how you might ask? First find an evolutionary chart of man, then carefully study each
peice of the chart, from the earliest of apes to modern man. then, find a sample of each. WHAT YOU SAY YOU CAN'T? That's outrageous. what can you
not find. You can't find the missing link? Oh that's okay we can overlook that tiny bit of information.(G-d must have forgotten to create that part
of the chart, blame Him)
Now, another very important contradiction found in the theory of evolution is this. In the beggining nothing existed. then, nothing created the
astroides that created Earth. Basically, it was all an accident, but once the earth is created then scientists decide that there must be order now to
the evolution. And order implies that someone must sustain it. for example, the gravitational pull of Earth, why does it not just stop working,and why
is there a constant for gravitation pull, why can scientist find reaccuring numbers through out the world and it's surroundings like the natural log
e. while all at the same time claiming that evolution is an accident and not ordered?
I'm am tired but I plan to finish this another time.. Till then have fun and Praise G-d.