It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Mayet
I don't see how a quake can raise the levels of measles significantly. It is not a disease caused by bad snaitation unlike other diseases that would be found in a disaster area.
I do wonder about the "Vitamin A" shots for everyone, I wonder if that is all it seems. Really I think this is a dangerous move and a suspicious one. It seems a good excuse to get in there and vaccinate more and more of the worlds population.
They are sprouting cases of diarrhoea in the region, but Measles and diarrhoea and in fact respiratory conditions don't have much if anything to do with those symptoms.
Communicable disease control and epidemic management
Malnutrition, diarrhoeal diseases, measles, acute respiratory infections, and malaria consistently account for 60-95% of reported deaths among refugees and displaced populations. Preventing high mortality from communicable disease epidemics in displaced populations relies primarily on the prompt provision of adequate quantities of water, basic sanitation, community outreach, and effective case management of ill patients allied to essential drugs and public health surveillance to trigger early appropriate control measures. Proper management of diarrhoeal diseases with relatively simple, low technology measures can reduce case fatality to less than 1%, even in cholera epidemics.
Immunisation
Immunisation of children against measles is one of the most important (and cost effective) preventive measures in affected populations, particularly those housed in camps. Since infants as young as 6 months old often contract measles in refugee camp outbreaks and are at increased risk of dying because of impaired nutrition, [size=3.5]measles immunisation programmes (along with vitamin A supplements) are recommended in emergency settings for all children from the ages of 6 months to 5 years (some would recommend up to 12-14 years). Ideally, measles immunisation coverage in refugee camps should be greater than 80%. Immunisation programmes should eventually include all antigens recommended by WHO’s expanded programme on immunisation (EPI).
The disruption of food supplies and health services, the stresses on families and communities, population displacement, and the breakdown of water and sanitation systems all take a heavy toll on the health and nutrition of children. Many die of severe malnutrition, while others become unable to resist common childhood diseases and infections. Of the 10 countries with the world’s highest rates of under-five mortality, seven are affected by conflict or its aftermath.
Measles, diarrhoeal diseases and acute respiratory infection, combined with malnutrition, are the most common child killers in emergencies. Other deadly threats include malaria, cholera and epidemic dysentery/shigellosis, typhoid fever, meningitis and HIV/AIDS.
Before measles vaccine became available, virtually all children contracted measles; an estimated 135 million cases with about 7-8 million deaths globally each year.
Measles in developing countries has resulted in high attack rates
among children
Originally posted by soficrow
hamburglar's right Mayet. Measles has changed - along with numerous other previously benign diseases. It was not deadly in the past, but it is now.
Go ahead, ask me to explain the changes in terms of molecular biology.
.
There is only one antigenic type of measles virus. Although studies
have documented changes in the H glycoprotein, these changes do
not appear to be epidemiologically important (i.e., no change in
vaccine efficacy has been observed).
Originally posted by soficrowGo ahead, ask me to explain the changes in terms of molecular biology.
Since infants as young as 6 months old often contract measles in refugee camp outbreaks and are at increased risk of dying because of impaired nutrition,
There is an increasing amount of research being conducted into the possible link between autism and vaccination. Along with many other groups throughout the world, the Autism Research Unit at the University of Sunderland is committed to examining the nature of this association through scientific research. Due to the nature of the work conducted at the Unit and the strong contact established with parents of people with autism, we at the Unit, have become increasingly aware of an increased incidence of parents claiming that their child's autism was the result of, or compounded by, vaccination. Many times each week, we are contacted by parents who talk about the effect they saw when their child was vaccinated, often describing harrowing scenes of extremely rapid regression, from perfectly ordinary children to children who exhibit very severe behavioural and physiological problems.
66.70.140.217...
1. They claim the vaccines are safe, but physicians are indoctrinated to disbelieve claims of harm and are not trained to recognize nor required to report any adverse reactions. From 90% to 99% of the adverse reactions reported to doctors are never reported by those doctors to the government’s extremely lax Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, known as the VAERS.
They say that the suspected linkage between the MMR vaccination and autism has been disproved by a study conducted by Brent Taylor and his colleagues in London, and published last year in The Lancet. The Taylor study is seriously flawed in many ways, as had been noted in a number of letters to the editor of The Lancet and in a number of additional letters on the subject which have been posted on the internet. It was subject to strong attack at a recent meeting of the British Statistical Society. I have been a full-time researcher my entire professional life, for almost 50 years, and I respectfully asked Dr. Taylor for a copy of the data so that I could reanalyze them. He refused this ordinary professional courtesy, and I have subsequently written to the editor of The Lancet requesting that an impartial committee be asked to reexamine Dr. Taylor’s statistical methods. If he refuses again, I urged The Lancet to retract his paper.
inquirer.gn.apc.org...
New research indicates that there might have been a very different story behind this campaign: Doctor Richard Nicholson, the editor of the Bulletin of Medical Ethics stated ,after studying all government reports, that there was no proof that such a major measles epidemic was about to start - and that: "there was no justification for the concomitant rubella immunisation" as the risk from rubella was minimal to all but pregnant women. The official statistics stated that 99% of teenage girls over 14 years of age were at that time immune from rubella and were not at risk.
He alleged the government's estimate of up to 50 deaths was based on "improper use of statistics and out of date death rates was based on out of date statistics." - that effectively the government was scare-mongering.
NimNih Gov
In a 19 month old girl and a 10 month old girl the Guillain-Barre syndrome developed within a week after they received, respectively, live measles-rubella vaccine and live measles vaccine. The older child was immune to the rubella at the time of vaccination, but both girls demonstrated a primary measles antibody response. Serum obtained during the acute and convalescent stages from the younger child was tested for antibodies against the herpes viruses (herpes simplex, Epstein-Barr virus, cytomegalovirus and varicella-zoster) and found to be negative.
At the high school where the 17 cases occurred, based on school records, only one of 2186 students had not received at least one dose of MCV before the outbreak; 1057 (49%) had received one dose of MCV, and 1112 (51%) had received two or more doses. Estimated vaccine efficacy for two or more doses of MCV was 100%.
A second dose of mumps vaccine, as recommended using measles-mumps-rubella vaccine, could potentially prevent similar outbreaks in secondary school populations in the future.
Originally posted by Mayet
Insult me all you wish. Condescend to me all you wish. The evidence against the use of vaccines is just as strong as the for argument.
Originally posted by Mayet
My eldest daughter was diagnosed with vitilago, an immune system disease a few months after her MMR shots. After her MMR shot she was very very sick with visible reaction to the shot.
Originally posted by Mayet
Ok co -incidence, maybe, that was only one child. hell I got another five we can play with here.
Originally posted by Mayet
My second daughter is autistic. It wasn't until after her MMR vaccine that I was told that she shouldn't have had it. It wasn't until after her MMR shot that she displayed symptoms of the form of Autism she has.
Measles infects 30 to 40 million children each year and kills over 500,000, often from complications related to pneumonia, diarrhoea and malnutrition. Many that survive are left with life-long disabilities: blindness, deafness or brain damage.
Originally posted by Mayet
Now you were so clever to insult me all this while and insult my knowledge which is fine
Originally posted by Mayet
I mean doctors are never wrong, especially when they are being pushed by drug companies and governments aren't they.
Originally posted by Mayet
But what you failed to take into account is that my children ARE immunized
Originally posted by Mayet
So how about you come see for yourself when my little baby girl goes to get her shot. How about you nurse her better and cry the millions of tears if something does go wrong.
Originally posted by Mayet
Mr hamburglar, so addressed as you are so good as putting your insults
Originally posted by Mayet
and it is Mrs Mayet to you.
Originally posted by Mayet
You see one side of a two sided debate. You are sprouting paper documents at me but you really are the one who do not have a clue, you know why? Its called personal experience, something I value to make my judgements on any issue. Not once not twice not three time not even four but five times.
Originally posted by Mayet
You have sat there and attacked me with paper, you have accused me of being wrong. So I bow down to your superior knowledge on this issue.
Originally posted by Mayet
But hey you never never know kind sir, just maybe, juuuuust maybe, they were all given dirty needles, ..eh that's it..the answer that I'm sure you have.....
Originally posted by Mayet
Now if you excuse me, I have nothing more to add, I showed you the other side of the coin, you know.... the dull side that has been lying in the dirt so long that noone wants to look at it.
Originally posted by Mayet
I am not going to argue and further denigrate this thread more than it has already.
Originally posted by Mayet
I will leave you to your paper beliefs while I nurse my children through their upheavels in life and I will continue to be saddened when I look at my daughters beautiful skin marred by this vaccine and I will continue to care for my disabled daughter and I will continue to speak out from the stance of someone who does know about the dangers of vaccination personally, even if you Mr Hambuglar in your infinite wisdom and worldly knowledge know more.
Originally posted by Mayet
But I left the icing till last.... my eldest daughter got real sick with spots about ten years ago now... I took her to the doctors and guess what.... she had the measles....
Originally posted by Hamburglar
What does my anecdote prove, Mrs. Mayet?
Originally posted by Odium
Hamburglar, there is no need to be rude time and time again to Mayet because you dislike her viewpoint. It really doesn't help your arguement.
Originally posted by Odium
What she is putting forward, is a case that is still on going - something which many parents are worried about. The MMR vaccine and many other 'wonder drugs', are not tested as highly as is needed. Primarily they are done over a few years when symptoms can take years to develop and secondly they are a way for Government to make even more money.
Originally posted by OdiumIn honesty, it would be better to give these children and adults food, water, beds, etc because these 'jabs' will do nothing to those who starve too death. The amount of time, money and effort that is being spent [in my opinion] is a waste and I doubt will save as many lives as you think they will. Also you have to ask yourself are the possible risks worth this?
Originally posted by Mayet
and I still re-iterate the point i was making here. They are far better using the effort and energy to get food and resources in there to stop the malnutrition and to naturally strengthen these childrens bodies so they can fight illness
Hamburglar, there is no need to be rude time and time again to Mayet because you dislike her viewpoint. It really doesn't help your arguement.
What she is putting forward, is a case that is still on going - something which many parents are worried about. The MMR vaccine and many other 'wonder drugs', are not tested as highly as is needed. Primarily they are done over a few years when symptoms can take years to develop and secondly they are a way for Government to make even more money.
In honesty, it would be better to give these children and adults food, water, beds, etc because these 'jabs' will do nothing to those who starve too death. The amount of time, money and effort that is being spent [in my opinion] is a waste and I doubt will save as many lives as you think they will. Also you have to ask yourself are the possible risks worth this?
To date, there are 5 vaccines that use aborted babies as part of
the manufacturing process: Rubella, as found in the M-M-R®II, the M-R-
Vax®II, the Meruvax®II, and the Biavax®II; Poliovax® inactivated vaccine
for Polio; Varivax® Varicella Virus Vaccine Live, for Chicken Pox; Imovax®
Rabies ID, Wistar Rabies Virus Strain PM-1503-3M Vaccine (and the rabies
immune globulin); and the newly recommended Havrix® Inactivated for Hepatitis A.