It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Missiles Fired at the WTC From Woolworth Building ?

page: 1
0
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 13 2005 @ 08:39 AM
link   
Well this is abit out there Orbs and missiles around and fired at the WTC.
Can it be more dis-info to add to the already compiling evidence of the US / Bush government involvement of the destruction of the World Trade Centre.
I don't know you decide.

More




The Untold Story of the Woolworth Building Incidents on 9-11-01






The Untold Story of the Woolworth Building Incidents on 9-11-01


More





Remembering 9/11, A Survivor's Story


Submitted by: Marine Forces Reserve Lance Cpl. Alan Reifenberg

Snip~~

"There was a 'swooshing' sound, then an explosion, and it sounded really low," Reifenberg recalled. "It was if someone, one or two floors above me, had launched a shoulder-fired missile."

Because it sounded so low, Reifenberg, and several other people, ducked to the ground. After moving slightly forward, he then looked up and saw a huge black hole near the top of Tower 2.

Marine Corps News






Innuendo, Erroneous Reports Abound In WTC Transcripts



"Can you send somebody over to the Woolworth Building to check the roof?" a Port Authority police officer asked. "There's a possible ... they said it was ... we just had a second explosion, possibly a missile from the roof of the Woolworth Building."

"The Woolworth Building?" replied a police operator.

"`Yeah, on ... on Broadway," the officer said.

www.wnbc.com...





Advice at WTC: Just stay put



At one point in the radio dispatches, there is a report of a "possible missile launching from the Woolworth Building," a landmark a few blocks away.

Another person called out: "They're shooting at the Trade Centre from the Woolworth Building."

www.nydailynews.com...







"...the police had a report that a missile had been fired at the World Trade Centre from the Woolworth building."

Alan Reiss, WTC Police Desk

www.9-11commission.gov...





NYC Fireman



As we pulled ‘round the corner, we stopped the rig, and a cop walked over to us and said, `I saw them shoot a missile launcher off that [Woolworth] building, you guys better be careful up there.’

www.mrbellersneighborhood.com...




[edit on 13/11/2005 by Sauron]




posted on Nov, 13 2005 @ 05:32 PM
link   
I know this is really out there but does no one have an opinion about this.

This site also writes about orbs and stealth bombers, so who knows more dis-info to confuse the masses.




Why The Woolworth Building

Curiously, it would seem that the North corner spire of the Woolworth Building should be the one showing damage, but the only spire showing damage (albeit four days later) was on the East corner of the Building.





Why the Woolworth Building?

The Northern tip of the roof of the Woolworth Building would have provided the best angle for viewing the attack of the North Tower compared to all other corners of the rooftop. Plus there are no buildings in the way to block the view. Now isn't it interesting that it was the North corner spire that was the section smoking, as if on fire? Is this perhaps evidence of the destruction of a video surveillance camera installed in that exact location for viewing the 9-11 attacks World Trade Center, and specifically the closer North Tower? Was there anyone who has admitted to seeing the 9-11 attack on the North Tower? Ironically, there is one person who admits to having seen the attack on the North Tower... Bush Junior!






On Sept. 11, U.S. Army Lieutenant Colonel Thomas Herman, Marist Class of 75, was at the side of the president of the United States in Sarasota, Fla. A senior presidential communications officer assigned to the White House, LTC Herman was responsible for establishing communications between the U.S. commander in chief and his top officials and assisting with his evacuation during one of the most critical moments in the history of the American presidency.



"Just as we were arriving at the school, I received a notification from our operations center than an airliner had struck one of the towers of the World Trade Center," says LTC Herman, "and that Dr. [Condoleezza] Rice, the national security advisor, was requesting the president on the telephone."
"The motorcade stopped then and there at Emma Booker Elementary School and we got out of the vehicles." LTC Herman, Maj. Paul Montanus, the military aide to the president, and the Secret Service moved the president into a "presidential hold," an office that has "both secure and nonsecure communications," he says.
"We got the president to a telephone, a secure telephone. He spoke to Dr. Rice. Dr. Rice obviously informed him of what had transpired. At that time we didnt know that it was a terrorist attack. There was some question as to what did happen. In other words, we were aware that the tower had been struck but we didn't know it was a concerted action.
"We were notified again that the second tower had been struck," LTC Herman remembers. "When the president became aware that this appeared that it was a concerted effort and there was some question about the security of the homeland, he made a series of phone calls." LTC Herman and the White House Military Office set up calls to Vice President Richard Cheney, FBI Director Robert Mueller, Dr. Rice and Attorney General John Ashcroft, among others. Then "there was a notification, obviously, that yes, it was a terrorist attack. He [the president] made a statement to the press and we departed."

www.marist.edu...


So the Prezz decides to hang around and read a book


What a lot of people don't know is that his limo has audio / video communications he had a secure phone in his car, where I believe he viewed the first crash from.


[edit on 13/11/2005 by Sauron]



posted on Nov, 13 2005 @ 06:14 PM
link   
It's possible that they fired missiles at the towers, you would think if terrorists really were involved we would investigate such things. :\

Could you find the video showing the "Orbs" and the Woolworth tower? That would help out in explaining what they could have been. I'll also look around for it and other relavent videos.

[edit on 13-11-2005 by NinjaCodeMonkey]



posted on Nov, 13 2005 @ 06:26 PM
link   
Its out there so its a possibility. If its what i think it could be, i just dont know how they could silence all the witnesses and all those involved.



posted on Nov, 13 2005 @ 06:47 PM
link   
I find it hard to believe it was a missile, most people still have trouble believing an airliner could bring down either of those buidlings. I would think it would need to be one hell of a missile.

This is starting to sound like the Crimson Permenant Insurance, did the Woolworth building sprout sails and float away?



posted on Nov, 13 2005 @ 06:50 PM
link   

Originally posted by NinjaCodeMonkey
It's possible that they fired missiles at the towers, you would think if terrorists really were involved we would investigate such things. :\

Could you find the video showing the "Orbs" and the Woolworth tower? That would help out in explaining what they could have been. I'll also look around for it and other relavent videos.

[edit on 13-11-2005 by NinjaCodeMonkey]


There are more photos at the site above, are they real I don't know



It does make a person think,, after all it was part of the 911 investigations.
This is from page nine of the testimony of Alan Reiss Deputy Director of Aviation at the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, before that he was Director of the agency's World Trade Department that operated at the WTC.

Before the the National Commission On Terrorist Attacks Upon The United States.Chaired by Kean and Vice Chairman Hamilton and others

page 9

quote

~~ I respond immediately to the World Trade Center Police Desk, which was in the immediate vicinity on the plaza level and was told that the police had a report that a missile had been fired at the World Trade Center from the Woolworth Building.




[edit on 13/11/2005 by Sauron]



posted on Nov, 13 2005 @ 07:10 PM
link   
just another form of disinformation to stray the mainstream public from the real truth about 9/11. I think if we all look in all directions, we will find all sorts of compiled data that would try to devert us away from what we are really looking for. And that is just the truth about what really happened on that dreadful day. After the sencond tower was hit. It took some time before tower #1 went down. If you look back, it resembles a building that is being imploded. Tower #1 and #2 fell to the ground with eligance. As if to implode a structure to fall to the ground in a movie. As if something was timed to go off in the event plan #1 did not work out. I happen to be a native gal from Manhattan. Yes, born and raised. So, indeed I have my own reasons why I too am seeking the truth. That was also my home town that was attacked on 9/11.

Edited for spelling again! Sorry.

[edit on 13-11-2005 by SkyChild_5]



posted on Nov, 13 2005 @ 08:25 PM
link   
I wonder if what looked like a UFO on the videos of 9/11 was a missile instead?



posted on Nov, 13 2005 @ 08:44 PM
link   

Originally posted by dgtempe
I wonder if what looked like a UFO on the videos of 9/11 was a missile instead?


Would these be the photos you are talking about.







or this one, I slowed the second one down to one third the speed




posted on Nov, 13 2005 @ 08:55 PM
link   


Look at that curvy flight path. That looks to me more like a bird or something than a missile, as I think missiles are a little more steady in flight than that.

All I have to say to the first set of pics is wtf.

[edit on 13-11-2005 by bsbray11]



posted on Nov, 13 2005 @ 09:00 PM
link   

Originally posted by bsbray11


Look at that curvy flight path. That looks to me more like a bird or something than a missile, as I think missiles are a little more steady in flight than that.

All I have to say to the first set of pics is wtf.

[edit on 13-11-2005 by bsbray11]


If you look close, you can actually see what might look like wings flapping. Good take on that one.



posted on Nov, 13 2005 @ 09:03 PM
link   

Originally posted by bsbray11

Look at that curvy flight path. That looks to me more like a bird or something than a missile, as I think missiles are a little more steady in flight than that.

All I have to say to the first set of pics is wtf.

[edit on 13-11-2005 by bsbray11]


yea I have to wounder about that little gif, I think it is to fast for a bird, maybe a bug, I don't know it's been kicking around the net from the get go but I have not read any good conclusions of what it could be.

Skychild I do agree it does look like a wing flapping at the end of the flight.

it does look like it passes in front of the towers, you guys may very well be right in saying it is a bird


[edit on 13/11/2005 by Sauron]



posted on Nov, 13 2005 @ 09:14 PM
link   
whatever we want to think we see. Or want to make oursleves believe we see. This is exactly what they wanted by posting those photo's up on the site. Could it be that those first photo's that show a missle type illusion could have been superimposed on to the film after the fact? Notice the shady color of what seems look like a missle. Just an observation on my part.



posted on Nov, 14 2005 @ 05:51 AM
link   
Hello


I first read about these Woolworth anomalies some times ago on Letsroll911.org website. That's weird indeed. Hard to conclude anything once again. But the reports of launched missiles and the testimoines make this event something we have to look at.

Here is a link to the Woolworth anomalies video footage : letsroll911.net...

[edit on 14/11/2005 by Musclor]



posted on Nov, 14 2005 @ 09:35 AM
link   
It's not a bird at all! If you look at the VERY beginning of the image, you can clearly see it's a plane. (You can visibly see it's wings and engines).

No idea what it is that comes out of the other end of the tower though...



posted on Nov, 14 2005 @ 04:13 PM
link   
Look at the lower left hand corner of this gif. Keep your eyes on it. Don't blink for a second or you will miss it. Notice that whatever that is that is flying toward towers seems to start off at ground level. Yes, ground level. Look good. Then takes a flying lead in altitude in seconds flat. Now, I will admit, I do have some knowledge about flying plans. There is now way that I know that a plane of any size, not even a cesna or pipper cub could do that. Not even a missel IMHO could be released so low to the ground and do the things that thing is doing.

Thoughts?



Originally posted by bsbray11


Look at that curvy flight path. That looks to me more like a bird or something than a missile, as I think missiles are a little more steady in flight than that.

All I have to say to the first set of pics is wtf.

[edit on 13-11-2005 by bsbray11]



posted on Nov, 14 2005 @ 05:35 PM
link   
UFOs, orbs, cargo windowless planes, no planes, missles, pods...no wonder
even the extreme left wing liberals don't take the 9/11 Truth movement seriously



posted on Nov, 14 2005 @ 06:25 PM
link   
I'm open minded. Instead of posting a one or two liner without any back up for your statement. Let's hear what you have to say about those pic's. Don't just hide behind left wing statement.


Originally posted by 8bitagent
UFOs, orbs, cargo windowless planes, no planes, missles, pods...no wonder
even the extreme left wing liberals don't take the 9/11 Truth movement seriously


[edit on 14-11-2005 by SkyChild_5]



posted on Nov, 14 2005 @ 06:40 PM
link   
Is there a larger version of this image?

I just had a closer look at it and there is a plane that hits the tower on the right then that weird plane comes in soon afterwards but doesn't hit anything.


I know for a fact when I saw videos of 9/11, I didn't see two planes in the same video sequence!



posted on Nov, 14 2005 @ 07:29 PM
link   
It looks like it is a military jet. Yes, I'm pretty sure of it. It was probably going to intercept the plane but was too late, or to make sure that the plane hit its target. If you look closly you can see that it looks very similar to a military jet. Plus, this could explain the speed. Also, the plane is not at ground level, it is the perspective that gives that illusion. It comes into frame at about the same hight as a 40 story building.




top topics



 
0
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join