It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by browha
Why would the goverment WANT to destroy two buildings of such importance?
Dont say to start a war on terrorism, Bin Laden had hardly been heard of to a serious extent before these had happened.
This has crippled the US economy (in my opinion, please feel free to criticize/back up), and frankly, we all saw the planes fly into it.
They had, what, an hour, to 'set up charges' as you claim.. What would have been the point?
Kill 3500 people?
Please, dont give a pathetic conspiracy theory.
Originally posted by MaskedAvatar
Check your jet fuel combustibility temperature assumptions until you are sure that you are happy the building was designed to spec.
Nothing I have ever read, official or otherwise, tells me that jet fuel combined with office materials in the WTC would have created the intense heat effects that you mention. I notice you tried to cover that off in your second para. Skadi has a good angle on that.
WTC7 is another story altogether.
I don't mind stuff being posted up for re-evaluation if there is new material presented. Within a few weeks there will be a research team looking at things with a far more critical eye, on some of the most objectively solvable and least covered unanswered questions of 9/11.