posted on Sep, 21 2003 @ 03:29 PM
Thanks for the links, peace.
Though it still remains in the realm of speculation, the WTC demolition, though not 100% verifiable, is VERY plausible, and I tend to lean towards
that theory than the jet fuel melting stuff. I posted before on the subject. I hads an aunt who worked in that area, and on leaving the scene and
running, she said she heard a lound thundering boom, turned around for a second, glimpsed the last piece of the high rise, and then it began to decend
below the building levels. She herself has no opinion on the matter, but was telling her story when my mom asked about it. It was very interesting,
Ive witness controlled demolitions before, and a similar sequence:
The charges are set off, lound thundering boom. The building, looking untouched, stands for a fgew seconds. Then suddenly, it starts falling like
water on top of itself.
Another interesting point is the lack of thoruough investigation that was done. I know in the past, invetigations on what caused many accidents went
on for years, the original plane parts being stored, and studied by engineers until a proper conclusion is reached. Thw WTC wreckage was hurridly
carted off and shipped for scrap, or buried in landfills within a few months. Its also interesting that the NYC fire fighters were very angry with
Guilianni because they werent allowed a full investigation into what caused the towers to collapse on thier brothers.
We will never know for certain, but demolition seems the most likely. But we need not worry, 9/11 is chock full of damning evidence that is completely
provable and requires little research, if any.
Given the other crap that went on that day.....controlled demolition is not ridiculous or absurd. It is something worth looking at.