Denmark On Muhammeds Naughty List, page 15
Pages: <<  12    13    14    15    16    17    18  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 4 times


reply posted on 6-2-2006 @ 07:15 AM by Ulvetann
Firebombs are being thrown at the austrian embassy in Iran!!!

In Teheran, about 200 demonstrators has been throwing rocks and firebombs against the austrian embassy!

Is it about time to drop a highly radioactive nuke, and show them the light to their padise?

Related link:
VG (norwegian)

-Btw, when they burnt the danish and norwegian embassy (earlier posting), the rabid animals of distorted faith, managed to burn down the chilenian embassy at the same time! So now, they have basically managed to draw Chile(!) into their ignorant mess.
-Demonstrations continues in Indonesia.
-EUs offices in Gaza has been attacked today.
-Queen Margrethe of Denmark, has been wrongly quoted in a british newspaper, more than a year ago, and this is now being used to agitate further riots.
- Danish forces in Iraq has been attacked, while giving first-aid to 15 children hit by truck!
- The danish ambassador in Bangladesh has been called in to recieve complaints, regarding the drawings of that dead geezer.
- Pakistani doctors to boycott danish medicine. -So be it...
- Riots spread to Thailand.
- Omar Bakri Mohammed want to execute the cartoonists!

Related links:
VG (norwegian)
VG (norwegian)
VG (norwegian)
BT (danish)
BT (danish)
BT (danish)
Politiken (danish)
Aftenposten (norwegian)
...and the links list goes on and on and on.. If interested, it is advisable to learn scandinavian, and follow the related liks from the sources pages...

Can't these ignorants see their own absurdity, in what they are doing, already?

[edit on 6-2-2006 by Ulvetann]


reply posted on 6-2-2006 @ 07:23 AM by Riwka
Originally posted by Hellmutt
Jerusalem Post are going to publish the cartoons today!


No, this information is wrong. Jerusalem Post will not publish those cartoons.
(And I think none of the Israeli press will)


reply posted on 6-2-2006 @ 08:02 AM by Beachcoma
A commendable move by the Jewish Press. What good would further fanning the fires serve?

I found this rather fair and balanced op/ed written in one of the local (Malaysian) papers. It wouldn't hurt anyone to read it.

The Star


...


The stance taken by European newspapers, that they not only have the right but that they must make the point that they can publish cartoons even if many Muslims find them offensive, is one such insensitivity that is now leading to protests around the world and a significant worsening of Western-Muslim relations.

Press freedom is not absolute even though editors especially those in the West may profess or think that it is.

There are double standards in this regard practised in the West too.

As pointed out in a letter in an English paper, the United States and British papers comply with requests not to publish photographs of American and British soldiers killed in Iraq or even highlight the return home of the bodies.

The governments don’t want such photos to further affect public opinion against the war and occupation.

Western newspapers are very careful not to publish articles that can be construed as being anti-Jew.

If they do, it is almost certain they will come under attack for being anti-Semite and probably have to apologise.

There are guidelines, whether formal or informal, so that journalists and editors avoid insulting women or homosexuals.

But when it comes to cartoons of the most revered figure in Islam, the editors of some of the most established newspapers in Europe see fit to state that they have the right to publish them in the name of freedom and so what if some Muslims feel insulted.


...


Someone once gave me an interesting and useful working definition of freedom of speech.

“The freedom of your arm to swing around ends at the point where it touches my nose.”

Individual liberty and the freedom of speech and press are fine principles but they are not absolute, for one person’s freedom may affect that of another person.

The freedom of someone to say or do something insulting may affect the freedom of someone else to be free from being insulted or provoked.

Sensitivity towards others, tolerance for their beliefs and avoidance of speech, words or cartoons that can hurt or insult others tempers the freedom that an individual or a newspaper has.

If this is not put into practice and even into law, then the social contract that exists, formally or informally, breaks down.

This is something understood in multi-ethnic, multi-religious Malaysia.

We are far from being perfect in this regard and certainly are not free from controversies from time to time.

But there is something the Western nations can learn from our country on this complex and emotive issue.




reply posted on 6-2-2006 @ 12:40 PM by Boatphone
Originally posted by Beachcoma

The Star
...

The stance taken by European newspapers, that they not only have the right but that they must make the point that they can publish cartoons even if many Muslims find them offensive, is one such insensitivity that is now leading to protests around the world and a significant worsening of Western-Muslim relations.



The Western cartoonists have every right to draw what ever they want. It is the Islamic leaders who are being "insensitive" and not respecting the lives and rights of free peoples of other nations!

Which is more "insensitive" drawing a cartoons of Muhammad or calling for the death of human lives?!


Press freedom is not absolute even though editors especially those in the West may profess or think that it is.


I guess you can not show nude people having sex but thats about it.


There are double standards in this regard practised in the West too.

As pointed out in a letter in an English paper, the United States and British papers comply with requests not to publish photographs of American and British soldiers killed in Iraq or even highlight the return home of the bodies.



This is true BUT that is our choice. They our OUR troops. We are doing what we feel is best. It has nothing to do with Islam. Alos, may Arab newspapers have printed those pictures and report, and yet, we have not called for their deaths...


The governments don’t want such photos to further affect public opinion against the war and occupation.


So? Arab newspaper can and do say whatever they want about the war, and we in the West do not try to tell their newspapers what to say.

Also, in America people write and publish anti-American, Anti-War and Anti-Bush things all the time. Yet, they still walk the streets freely. See the difference.


Western newspapers are very careful not to publish articles that can be construed as being anti-Jew.


But they can if they want to. Also, in American we allow the writings and speeches made by the KKK even thou we all hate them, we still protect their free speech. See?


But when it comes to cartoons of the most revered figure in Islam, the editors of some of the most established newspapers in Europe see fit to state that they have the right to publish them in the name of freedom and so what if some Muslims feel insulted.


Yes, that is true. It's called "Freedom".

-- Boat


reply posted on 6-2-2006 @ 03:23 PM by Riwka
The usual suspects:



Protests over Mohammed cartoons intensify in Iran

Hardline President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad also lashed out at the offending newspapers, which have carried the drawings in the name of freedom of expression, as "prisoners of a bunch of blood-sucking Zionists."




reply posted on 6-2-2006 @ 09:46 PM by djohnsto77
An American cartoonist made this a few years ago and the Council on American-Islamic Relations republished on its site and STILL HAS IT! Maybe the Muslims should storm CAIR and burn it down!

Cartoon:




By: Doug Marlette


CAIR's site:


A national Islamic civil rights and advocacy group today expressed outrage at a Doug Marlette syndicated editorial cartoon, headlined "What Would Mohammed Drive?" showing the Prophet Muhammad driving a nuclear bomb-laden truck similar to that used by Timothy McVeigh in the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing.

The Washington-based Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) called for an apology from Marlette's syndicator, Tribune Media Services, and from his employer, the Tallahassee Democrat.

The cartoon is apparently a play on a recent light-hearted public debate over what kind of car Jesus would drive. Its publication comes following worldwide outrage over a similar accusation of terrorism against Muhammad by American evangelist Jerry Falwell.



CAIR


Of course this cartoonist also got the obligatory death threats.

[edit on 2/6/2006 by djohnsto77]
Pages: <<  12    13    14    15    16    17    18  >>    ^^TOP^^



Alaska: Samantha Koenig Kidnapped last week.
  Posted 3 days ago with 111 member flags
Blue Spheres Fall from the Sky in the UK
  Posted 15 days ago with 81 member flags
The Chinese have seen the dragon in the sky !!
  Posted 2 days ago with 68 member flags
Strange Sounds in Sky Explained by Scientists
  Posted 12 days ago with 59 member flags
She Dialed 911. The Cop Who Came to Help Raped Her.
  Posted 5 days ago with 49 member flags
Anonymous: Revealing The Arcane Legal Trick Behind ACTA
  Posted 12 days ago with 42 member flags
Anonymous reveals Haditha massacre emails | RT
  Posted 7 days ago with 33 member flags