It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Astyanax
In the above post, please read 'supernaturally' for 'almost supernaturally'.
Thank you.
After all, one doesn't want to be rude.
originally posted by Esoteric Teacher Why is it easy for atheists to justify their logic and pass judgment upon non atheists through opinionated prejudicial objectivity when they don’t have any personal experience to draw upon from within there own mind to know what the other half of the scales hold?
originally posted by Esoteric Teacher (i.e. Garth Brooks's album entitled "No More Fences"). An atheist may not see God in that album title, but an individual of faith may equate that title to something with a deeper meaning.
originally posted by Esoteric Teacher Explain how Atheists are justified in their even making an arguement when it is apparent Atheists never believed in a God, but those who do believe have an insight into what it was not to believe in God.
Originally posted by Cinosamitna
Well, atheism is a religious cult, as they trade in belief of God for a 'demon', namely the clouded human egoism becomes their 'God'. Were not Stalin and Lenin great atheists?
When you see another person as mere cattle, devoid of spirit and soul, its much easier to slaughter them by the tens of millions like Lenin and Stalin did, right?
No its not, I'm atheist and I just don't believe in God, how am I now in a religious cult?
Is it as easy to slaughter those who do not believe in the one true God (whichever one you chose). These non-believers not only reject your God, they also worship a false God. Infidels!
Originally posted by Cinosamitna
You cannot be sure if their is a God, then you cannot be an atheist.
: one who believes that there is no deity
www.m-w.com...
Have the Jesuits or Islamic nations every murdered over 100 million people in but one century?
: one who believes that there is no deity
www.m-w.com...
I don't believe in God, therefore I am an atheist.
Man, you really don't like Communists huh? Also it is easier to kill a lot more people in this modern age, what with the automatic rifles and all.
Originally posted by dgoodpasture
Originally posted by Astyanax
In the above post, please read 'supernaturally' for 'almost supernaturally'...
What is supernatural if it is naturally existing within itself and within the naturalness of the universe(s)/existence?
Originally posted by Cinosamitna
: one who believes that there is no deity
www.m-w.com...
I don't believe in God, therefore I am an atheist.
What does belief have to do with actually 'knowing'? You can believe anything you like but you either have to know, or not know.
You cannot say " I am an atheist because I believe (or I assume) there is no deity"
To be an atheist, you must be able to say with certainty “I KNOW there is no deity" and no atheist can say this today and actually be sure, in so saying.
You are a typical 'agnostic' in denial, calling himself an 'atheist'.
Well if thats the case then you cannot say for sure that your religion is true, you cannot state for certain that your god even exists - as you say you need to know.
But in saying that I KNOW that your god does not exist in this universe. The probability that your god exists in this universe is very very very very slim (in fact non existant). The way that most gods are described by their followers is wrong and illogical and usually contradictory.
Originally posted by Cinosamitna
Look what happened when an atheist attcked the Buddhists in China? Mau killed, what, 40 million? Stalin and Lenin combined killed how many, 60-80 million? I don't know any religion that has starved to death, tortured and murdered this nany people in one century, do you? Not even the early church under Jesuit control (at the worst time) murdered this many!
Actually the early religious conflicts did much much worse than just kill. People were burnt alive, enslaved, raped, eaten, tortured, crucified and all manner of other nasty things. As already stated, it is easier to kill people nowadays due to our advanced weapons. Imagine if the earl Christians had access to nukes. Do you think they would have hesitated to 'purify with fire'?
Originally posted by Cinosamitna
I agree with you that no religion can claim to be correct. But what makes one think that God ‘exists’, or that to KNOW God we must be religious? Human beings exist relatively speaking, but God is "Absolute Reality" and "Absolute BE-NESS" and thus can not necessarily be defined as ‘existence' in material terms. God is Multiplicity, not multiple, but One. But we can KNOW GOD because we can see his reflection in “life” itself.
The further one travels out into space, the higher the probability of us coming into contact with some previously unknown phenomenon. Thus, the more we study all the things which we can presently see, the probability increases that the things which we do see now, are created by those things which we ‘cannot see’. Thus, as we find more things which we cannot see, creating things things which we can see, we find out eventually that we can never catch up externally searching unless we discover that all the 'causes' are not outside us, but studying "life" is the cause and the answer to the riddle of man.
Religion is the excuse, not the cause. Politicians use religion to justify their power and we have an athiets like G W Bush calling themselves Christians.
But you would have to define god, define what god can, cant do or what it actually does or has done. The definition of god is the crux of the argument.
I see no reflection of any god in life or the universe, I see no knowledge of any god except in the minds of believers.
I agree but the probability for god does not increase. God is a faith based notion while most unknown phenomena are based on empirical data.
But as I said god needs to be defined, by all religious groups (whether he be entirely different) to allow any debate to flow.
All believers use their religion as a scape goat, its called :
NOT TAKING RESPONSIBILITY FOR YOUR OWN ACTIONS.
If something good happens then its god that done it, same in reverse if any bad happens then its satans fault. Get a grip folks if you do good - you've done good, If you do bad - then you've done bad. Wheres the need for external mythical beings???????
Originally posted by shihulud
But you would have to define god, define what god can, cant do or what it actually does or has done. The definition of god is the crux of the argument.
I see no reflection of any god in life or the universe, I see no knowledge of any god except in the minds of believers.
I agree but the probability for god does not increase. God is a faith based notion while most unknown phenomena are based on empirical data.
Religion is the excuse, not the cause.
All believers use their religion as a scape goat, its called :
NOT TAKING RESPONSIBILITY FOR YOUR OWN ACTIONS.
If something good happens then its god that done it, same in reverse if any bad happens then its satans fault. Get a grip folks if you do good - you've done good, If you do bad - then you've done bad. Wheres the need for external mythical beings???????
Originally posted by Esoteric Teacher
Originally posted by shihulud
But you would have to define god, define what god can, cant do or what it actually does or has done. The definition of god is the crux of the argument.
I see no reflection of any god in life or the universe, I see no knowledge of any god except in the minds of believers.
And your basis for comparison is dependent upon how far into your own mind you have gone. Can you prove to me that you are consciously aware of your own thoughts? Because science provides a means to prove otherwise. One can only find what one knows to look for, or how would they have capacity to incorporate such information with a mind that only operates under the "law of association"?
I agree but the probability for god does not increase. God is a faith based notion while most unknown phenomena are based on empirical data.
empirical data changes, and science has failed us many times. Take the below stated quote for example, which was the general concensus at the time, the world over:
"Radio has no future. Heavier-than-air flying machines are impossible. X-rays will prove to be a hoax."
--William Thomson, Lord Kelvin English scientist, 1899.
Has a person still done a good thing when the good thing is a result of the fear of the consequences? Were their intentions good in your opinion?
As for "Where's the need for external mythical beings"?
The answer is there is no need for external mythical beings, because God exists.
So, i ask you one more time:
What internal mechanism exists that permits for an individual to gain access to their own subconscious thoughts, and what will cause a person to be inclined to delve into their own psychi to evaluate their own intentions, and initiators for them?
[edit on 6-9-2006 by Esoteric Teacher]