posted on Sep, 20 2003 @ 12:39 PM
Thank you again all. I have already drawn out the polyhedra and discovered (the star of David-icosahedron) that tetrahedron is fundamental design
upon which all polyhedra correlate. I actually
have a books filled with my diagrams, data, designs myself, (although they really demonstrate what I tried to verify in syntax)
I also realized that my models and designs on the fly were dead-on with current phrasings. this pleased me greatly to know that I was barking up the
right tree. As of six months ago I had never attempted to even comprehend geometry in any fashion.
I just discvered my knack for visualization and went with it. For about two months in the summer I taught myself geometry with no textbooks, school
or such. Gotauma Siddhartha said every man was his own best teacher. I am not being arrogant either it just blows me away that this crap just
'comes' to me. It is as if I was meant to do this. I remember drawing a terahedron for a friend once and saying that I thought that shape defined
parametrics in reality and physical law causality. he was astonished and told me what the shape was. At present, i have about 200 pages of research
stemming from Kepler, Plancke, Einstein, Penrose, Euclid,
Plato, and a host of others. i have compared my intel with their work and know that I was right in my axioms. I never read or studied these guys and
still haven't except to verify models and formulae.
I really want to upload (my mac requires a scanner) where I am at so that I can avoid descriptions and penetrate deeper into the data I have as to
show what I have realized and recorded. The only thing beyond that is to work out models that ALWAYS remain
stable. The cube is only entropic as it doesn't really exist without its lack of existence. Paradoxical I know. If we take a cube and divide it
into sixty four cubes, then each of them into sixty four respectively, eventually it will (lines of force collapsing and God willing) justify. Then I
can prove that its own collapse is motivated by its own expansion. In this model of cubic reduction we see that
the hypercube is divided not only infinitely into itself in proportion but also that curvature eventually occurs. Each sub-cube breaking down and
dividing by masses introduced into its entropic design symmetry.
Velocity, force, mass, density, gravity, energy are all divided by the symmetries as well. Their reorganized state does not follow linear
congruency however as the physicalities would redistribute in proportion to its organizational construction. As it found division, it would
re-iterate equal causalities in all directions each proportionate zone of entropy fractioned into and redistributed by
itself within as outside of... This is the easy part but the hard part is the beginning and the end. How does one find a country inside a cabin?