French government has listed its terms for surrender to Jihad, page 4
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6    7  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 8-11-2005 @ 03:09 PM by AceOfBase
Originally posted by Souljah

THE FORCED SLAVERY OF AFRICAN CONTIENT?

THE COLONIZATION OF AFRICA, ASIA and the MIDDLE EAST?


Both of those also apply to Islam.
Slavery was already in existence in Africa before they started being sent to the Americas. The muslims were already heavily engaged in it.
The muslims also treated their slaves much worse than the Europeans did, even castrating the men.


africanhistory.about.com

Black Africans were transported to the Islamic empire across the Sahara to Morocco and Tunisia from West Africa, from Chad to Libya, along the Nile from East Africa, and up the coast of East Africa to the Persian Gulf. This trade had been well entrenched for over 600 years before Europeans arrived, and had driven the rapid expansion of Islam across North Africa.



reply posted on 8-11-2005 @ 03:19 PM by shire19
Originally posted by Crakeur
simply put, there's too much negative, not enough positive. when the president of a muslim nation calls for the destruction of another nation, and the rest of the muslim world doesn't IMMEDIATELY condemn his words, the image the religion gets is not a positive one.


Here in the UK there has been more than enough coverage, at the 7/7 memorial all the students in the Muslim schools were brought outside and several childeren were interviewed and they showed compassion, British Muslim Council steps up action to sway Muslim youth from getting their minds poisoned in mosques.
Muslims all around the UK were interviewed regarding the attacks to voice their opnion and to show people that these terrorists we're not acting on the will of Allah but merely using it to justify their actions.

Unforunatly there is too much negativity clouding the postive side, but ofcourse most of the Muslims living abroad still have the mentality that the West is evil for all the obvious reasons and see any attack on the West as revenge.

About Iran:

"Hours after hijacked American airliners destroyed the World Trade Center and a portion of the Pentagon on September 11, Iranian President Mohammad Khatami announced on state television, "I condemn the terrorist operations of hijacking and attacking public places in American cities which have resulted in the death of a large number of defenseless American people." The main suspect in the attacks is the Al-Qa'ida terrorist network and its leader, Osama bin Laden, who lives in neighboring Afghanistan as a guest of the ruling Taliban militia."
Source

The actions of the current Iranian president were stupid and shouldn't have been said, the Iranian council already stepped up to condemn the remarks.


reply posted on 8-11-2005 @ 03:38 PM by Seekerof
as posted by shire19
Remember, without any foreigners, no country in the West would be as rich and wealthy as they currently are.. Who would do the dirty jobs no one else wants?

By referencing the "West," you must certainly be referring to the nations of Europe? I noticed that your from the UK? Is this how it is in the UK? What is happening in France can easily happen in the UK?

At any rate, your ultimate point is what exactly, shire19?
That past European colonialism is causing the rioting that is currently happening in France today?

Maybe it would have been best to stay within your borders then for the past millenia's, instead of dividing and conquering the rest of the world and eventually having foreigners in the West through those actions, wheter it be for slaves or the West encouraging to go there.

Hindsight is 20/20, huh?

The problems occurring in France, and in other European nations with this problem, is not one of past colonialism. France has a very progressive socialist social-welfare system, and quite frankly, I find it highly dubious, if not ironic, that those preferred socialistic styled programs are failing to the degree that they are, if they are. The problem, as I see it and interpret it, is one of age old European rooted racism, that despite the abundance of socialistic styled social-welfare systems, prevents France from not being able to entirely address the situation. I will concede that this is debatable, to some degree. Even so, the point being made here should not be entirely dismissed, as well.

Just my opinion, but till the real problem is addressed, and that being old European rooted rascism, and bear in mind that anti-semetism has been increasingly on the rise in Europe, social-welfare problems will never entirely address the situation. It will only act as a stop-gap candy-coated bandaid.





seekerof

[edit on 8-11-2005 by Seekerof]


reply posted on 8-11-2005 @ 04:09 PM by nathraq

Bout Time said:

Keep chasing your tail, but the Western world you want to preserve is being killed by Western leaders, not immigrants


This is true, and I have said that. But that it only part of the problem.

It boils down to this: We let immigrants move into our cities to find work, and to better their fortunes in life. We give them residential visas, and eventually in some cases, citizenship. All this, with no strings attached, except a pledge of loyalty to the country in which they are now residing.

What does the host country get in return: havens of immigrant ghetto-type dwellings, riddled with crime and drugs. All the while, they are living off of a government check. The future may seem bleak, but it is a helluva lot better than where they came from.

Now, this type of scenario isn't really prevalent in American society, as we do not have the social security blanket that other Western Nations have. Immigrants can not come here, and expect a federal check every month, right off the bat. Most here have assimilated to the point, where 2nd and 3rd generation offsprings of immigrants can no longer speak the native tongue of the country from which their grandparents came. This is the American phenemonom.

Europe, on the other hand, has cultures just as old as the nations from which the immigrants are coming. They see this as an imposition on their cultures, beliefs, and way of life. And they have every right to feel that way. Germans are German; French are French; and British are British. But the fact that their cultures, though varying to a certain degree, are similar in more ways than not. They have a united belief system in law and order; in technical advancement, and of social harmony. These ideas date back to the united Roman Empire, and in the case of law and order, date back even further to some Germanic Tribal law and morals, which are still in use today.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6    7  >>    ^^TOP^^