It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by JIMC5499
I'd have to include the the B-58 Hustler and possibly the the Tu-95 Bear in this group. The B-58 for being the first supersonic bomber and the Bear for being the first turboprop bomber.
As much as I love the A-4 and the Mosquito I think that we would be better off adding an attack aircraft catagory and putting both of them in that group along with the Stormovik
Originally posted by kilcoo316
Gonna disagree with you here Jim
For me, the Mosquito was undoubtedly one of the best ever examples of ingenious engineering and fully deserves its place. DeHavilland's train of thought for the concept (making a high performance aircraft that uses commonly available materials - i.e. freely available within the UK) behind the Mosquito was inspired, and the execution perfect.
[edit on 7-11-2005 by kilcoo316]
Originally posted by JIMC5499
I'd have to include the the B-58 Hustler and possibly the the Tu-95 Bear in this group. The B-58 for being the first supersonic bomber and the Bear for being the first turboprop bomber.
As much as I love the A-4 and the Mosquito I think that we would be better off adding an attack aircraft catagory and putting both of them in that group along with the Stormovik
Originally posted by NWguy83
B-1B = Supersonic, low flying, slightly stealthy, and carries the largest weapons payload of any American bomber. It took Afghanistan and Iraq for the Air Force to really appreciate it and value it.
Originally posted by HowlrunnerIV
And almost as deadly to its crews as the F104 "widowmaker". I'd suggest that the Lancer doesn't belong anywhere on one of these lists for the fact that it was canned, resurrected at great cost and then had a short shelf-life.
Originally posted by HowlrunnerIV
AS for XB35, I thought they were Northrop YB 49s. Which were practically in full production before the AAF said "If it can't carry the bomb, no thanks."
Originally posted by Lonestar24
I think your list should incorporate the Junkers Ju-87
Originally posted by ShatteredSkies
XB-35 deserves some creds for setting the stage for flying wing bombers. Despite it never reaching full production due to the limitations of current computer technology, I believe that if FBW existed back then, that it would be one hell of a bomber. Despite it possibly, remotely having some connection to the Horton Flying wings(just to cover those hardcore German Tech fans that say that the Horton flying wings are more influential than the original Northrop wings, which personally I think that Northrop had his own ideas in mind). Just a bit remotely.
Shattered OUT...
Originally posted by waynos
And herein we see the very difficulty that I was on about at the beginning, many people see bombers as meaning strategic bombers whilst others see them as anything designed to drop bombs.
Again, out of a desire not to clutter the board with too many similar threads I elected to lump them all in just the one. While I understand and actually agree with your reasoning I hope you understand why I did it this way.
Originally posted by Lonestar24
I think your list should incorporate the Junkers Ju-87 (the most common "Stuka" and also the most famous german airplane ever). This aircraft introduced (not invented) the precision strike on the battlefield,
Above the novelty the Ju-87 was on the battlefield it was technically superiour to all its contemporary divebomber rivals,
Originally posted by Char2c35t
The first bombers were the airships of ww1 that was the start,
what about the Lancster or Wellingiton or Betty (iirc the japanese bomber) and what no torpedo bombers?
that list is imcoplete missing the grandslam/bambusters, the anti-shipping pacific bombers, and the old/new bi/mono torpedo bombers.