Sorry i asked in the introductions part twice where to post this and i have had no reply. So i'l post it here. If it's in the wrong section, then
please move admins. Danke
First time I have ever done something like this so excuse me if its rough and sketchy. I hope though my points on this subject come accross very well
Why You Should Avoid Taking Vaccines
On the surface, that question sounds stupid and idiotic. The usual response would be to look at that sentence and laugh followed by the usual response
of " Well of course u need them to protect you against infections and diseases. " That couldn't sound more true ! It is only until you scratch the
surface though that you see some statistics don't make sense, leading Doctors voicing their opinions on the subject, and various websites pointing
out strange happenings.
I of course have had many jabs / injections in my lifetime. I guess we are brought up around the new age of computers where information is much more
readily available. Our parents were not able to access health papers, information from Doctors as easily as we are today. So of course they would have
followed the health warnings like sheep and got as many injections into us as possible.
Now stop to think. We relate people's good health and recovery / avoidance from diseases from injections they have had over the years. Flu, measles,
chicken pox, Tb, etc etc. Much of the success attributed to vaccination programs may actually have been due to improvement in public health related to
water quality and sanitation, less crowded living conditions, better nutrition, and higher standards of living. Typically the incidence of a disease
was clearly declining before the vaccine for that disease was introduced. In England the incidence of polio had decreased by 82 % before the polio
vaccine was introduced in 1956.
There are more and more weird facts and figures which show that the disease was decreasing by a hell of a lot, before governments thought it would be
wise to step up injections again. Now im sure I am not the only one that thinks thats weird....
The following list of data comes from By Dr. James Howenstine, MD
examples are as follows :
1 ) In the early 1900s an astute Indiana physician, Dr. W.B. Clarke, stated "Cancer was practically unknown until compulsory vaccination with cowpox
vaccine began to be introduced. I have had to deal with two hundred cases of cancer, and I never saw a case of cancer in an unvaccinated person."
2) Today less than 10 % of German children are vaccinated against pertussis (whooping cough ). The number of cases of pertussis has steadily
decreased, even though far fewer children are receiving pertussis vaccine.
3) Measles outbreaks have occurred in schools with vaccination rates over 98 % in all parts of the U.S. including areas that had reported no cases of
measles for years. As measles immunization rates rise to high levels measles becomes a disease seen only in vaccinated persons. An outbreak of measles
occurred in a school where 100 % of the children had been vaccinated. Measles mortality rates had declined by 97 % in England before measles
vaccination was instituted.
4) In 1986 there were 1300 cases of pertussis in Kansas and 90 % of these cases occurred in children who had been adequately vaccinated. Similar
vaccine failures have been reported from Nova Scotia where pertussis continues to be occurring despite universal vaccination.
5) After institution of diptheria vaccination in England and Wales in 1894 the number of deaths from diptheria rose by 20 % in the subsequent 15
years. Germany had compulsory vaccination in 1939. The rate of diptheria spiraled to 150,000 cases that year whereas, Norway which did not have
compulsory vaccination, had only 50 cases of diptheria the same year.
The continued presence of these infectious diseases in children who have received vaccines proves that life long immunity which follows natural
infection does not occur in persons receiving vaccines. The injection process places the viral particles into the blood without providing any clear
way to eliminate these foreign substances.
Find these figures here ( www.newswithviews.com...
The list goes on and on and u generally find a pattern, that is astounding. You have injections and an outbreak of illness follows related to what you
have just had the injection for.
So much so that my friend is refusing to have his children vaccinated now. It sounds extreemely risky and he has had numerous letters off the doctors
stressing the importance of having such injections, but he is sticking by his own judgment. Much of today's fear is only brought on by government
control. Letters in doctors surgery's, health warnings on tv. They fear the population into thinking we need these injections fast !
Mercury found in injections
The headlines around the world are ablaze with the news that a whooping cough vaccine given to babies has been found to contain potentially dangerous
levels of mercury. The vaccine is being withdrawn, and parents are now having to wait for a new vaccine that will be available in several months.
The real story in all of this, however, is that mercury is frequently used as a preservative in vaccines. Some amount of mercury is found in virtually
every vaccine given to children, not in just this one vaccine. It is astonishing, too, that vaccinations containing mercury continue to be given to
our children on a regular basis each and every year, across the country, and around the world.
Mercury is of course a metal, that is very dangerous to humans as can be found in medical reports everywhere (
It is a heavy metal known to contribute to neurological disorders, including autism, dementia, and even Alzheimer's disease. Mercury also tends to
build up in tissues in the human body and is not easily removed, so even small exposures to mercury can accumulate over time and end up compromising
the health of the person involved.
So lets put the facts together - Mercury is dangerous to humans - so I know what would be a good plan, put it in injections, and inject us with it.
Sounds fair to me.... : /
Injections containing other man made disease's
I am sure alot of you think that what u are getting in the jab is what your doctor tells you. Think again. I am not saying that the doctor is in on
the plot. He is probably a very nice man. It could not even be the people who manufacture the fluid. It could be way way back at its starting place of
manufacture. In fact - the doctor is not even allowed the vaccine. they are all sealed up and supplied mainly from the WHO and BHO ( World and
Brittish Health Organisation ). The Doctors are told to inject - NO QUESTIONS ASKED. Some injections have other micro-organism's / pathogens inside
I am sure u are aware also that Aid's virus is reported now more often to be a man made virus. Why i hear u ask ? Because that will reduce the worlds
Aids Ebola, Gulf War Illness (GWI), and many other "new" diseases were intentionally bioengineered in laboratories that are mostly found in the
United States and include the Army's secretive facilities at Ft. Detrick Maryland.
Some bioengineered pathogens were designed to target certain ethnic groups for elimination. These groups likely include blacks, hispanics, Black
Africans, Native Americans, and homosexuals. The preferred iIluminati method to introduce disease is via vaccinations. Dr. Len Horowitz firmly
established in his 1995 book, Emerging Viruses, that the HIV virus which causes AIDS was introduced and spread throughout the majority of black
populations in Africa via the World Health Organization (WHO) during their mandatory smallpox vaccine campaigns of 1976-1980.
( Info found here - educate-yourself.org...
The creation of the AIDS virus by the WHO was not just a diabolical scientific exercise that got out of hand. It was a cold-blooded successful attempt
to create a killer virus which was then used in a successful experiment in Africa. So successful in fact that most of Central Africa may be wiped
Another good site can be located here ( www.totse.com...
I guess you just have to judge for yourself, do a simple google search, there is plenty of information out there on this topic.
Injections containing other man made micro-chips
On the surface yet again it would seem an ok idea. Your Doctor would be able to locate you wherever u are and help u in your time of need. Yet again
though that is only on the surface in my humble opinion. You need to scratch below the surface again and u will find out something more scary...
They say on the net that this chip has the capability (or will have) to be connected to huge databases over the internet. Once people have it, they
will be able to track your every movement and every financial transaction.
I guess the biblical prophesy is true -- the time is coming when we will no longer be able to buy or sell without the mark of the beast. Although no
one can say for sure that the veri-chip is this mark, one can't deny that if it isn't, it will definitely lead to the actual mark.
I really do believe that we are no longer run by a democratic society, but by anarchy, which is totally controlled by the rich and devised in a way
that it "appears" we have a democracy. Most people must've learned by now that no matter what they ask of their politicians, the final answer will
really depend on what the large corporations want. After all, these are the people who are electing them.
And of course remember it's all about becoming more powerfull and much much richer !!!
And im sure if this chip and many others are a success. What's to stop there. They could implant us with other chips made of metal remember ! They
could create allergic reactions, the body could reject them, and imo the most serious, they will take our freedom away !
I for one do not want to be micro-chipped / tagged like a mental patient, animal, or somebody in jail
It's amazing how much things have changed since the invention of the 386/66 computer isn't it? Somehow those last 3 numbers ring a bell.
Side note - important information thats kept from the public !
Treatment for aids and other such diseases - HIDDEN
In the Fall of 1990, two medical researchers, Drs.William Lyman and Steven Kaali, working at Albert Einstein College of Medicine in New York City made
an important discovery. They found that they could inactivate the HIV virus by applying a low voltage direct current electrical potential with an
extremely small current flow to AIDS infected blood in a test tube.
They applied a direct current to the electrodes and found that a current flow in the range of 50-100 microamperes (uA) produced the most effective
results. Practically all of the HIV viral particles were adversely affected while normal blood cells remained unharmed.
Researchers were forced to keep quiet though after being threatened by the pharmaceutical companies who would lose many 100 of billions of dollars if
the method came into wide spread use. Remember an Aids person is a revenue stream for an average of 5 years of between $5000 to $20000 per person per
year for the pharmaceutical industry.
Remember it is simple electrical current nothing else that disable the virus/pathogens. In the case of the Aids virus the electrical current stops it
reproducing and the body's immune system removes the remaining virus. The level of the current is very low, 25 milliamps is required to electrocute a
person.These devices only use 0.3 milliamps to 1 milliamp maximum.This is much less than a Tens device.
Find relevant information here - this information could be so important to you and your relatives. It could save lives and we dont know about it
Scroll down on that link and have a good read...
Vaccines are an unnatural phenomena. My guess is that if enough persons said no to immunizations there would be a striking improvement in general
health with nature back in the immunizing business instead of man. Having a child vaccinated should be a choice not a requirement. Medical and
religious exemptions are permitted by most states.
When governmental policies require vaccinations before children enter schools coercion has overruled the lack of evidence of vaccine efficacy and
safety. There is no proof that vaccines work and they are never studied for safety before release. My opinion is that there is overwhelming evidence
that vaccines are dangerous and the only reason for their existence is to increase profits of pharmaceutical firms.
Recent legislation passed by Congress gives the government the power to imprison persons refusing to take vaccines (smallpox, anthrax, etc). This
would be troublesome to enforce if large numbers of citizens declined to be vaccinated at the same time.
I hope i have shed some light on important matters that seem to escape the general publics eye !
The most important link i can give 4 reference about injections is this
[edit on 4-11-2005 by Arawn]
mod edit to shorten link
[edit on 6-11-2005 by DontTreadOnMe]