posted on Sep, 23 2003 @ 09:18 PM
quote bryd
Sitchin MISINTERPRETED the Enumma Elish for his own financial gains. It's a hoax/lie so the man could sell books to the gullible.
I disagree
10th planet makes sense, even a Nasa scientist Dr. Harrington was looking for a planet that would solve the problems seen in our own universe.
Knocking planets on their side and even taking a Moon and turning it into a planet, we call Pluto.
Remember how the World was FLAT and you would fall off, flatly saying this is untrue is not taking it and mixing it with what our past tells us.
Monuments we today can't even begin to build yet are still standing to this day. If we have another planet in our system that has a rough orbit of
3600 years means rough. Perhaps on how it can push and pull on the rest of the planets may make it's orbit wobble, just as our own planet does.
Then if this other planet began life before us why would they let us know about them if we are at a pointe they may have gone thru already with WARS?
To say he is doing this for money is making a statement you have no evidence.
Jim Jones or David Karaseh? knowing what we do about them can say yes it was money and power they were after. Your assuming and we all know what
assume means when translated.
Michael
3600 years shows there was no flood, I agress. But I believe their is a problem with the timeline we are using on some of our past history. Sphinx is
a prime example with those trying to date it.
I agree that it is much older than what the current thought is, thus the Flood is in of itself farther back then thought, only the past few thousand
of years have we put down a record for those in the future to read.
[Edited on 24-9-2003 by Ark-Angel]