It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by just me 2
Jesus doesn't want you to go there, that's why He sacrificed Himself for you so you wouldn't have to go to such an awful place!
He could have simply not sent me there in the first place.
Originally posted by just me 2
Don't parents punish their children when they do something wrong? Most of the ones I know do, anyways!
Take the advice or leave it, I don't care. You deserve the hostile reactions you've received.
I'm not saying that at all. I'm saying that to claim it is impossible to know first requires that you know, which contradicts the claim that it's impossible to know. I'm not claiming it's impossible to know, or that it is possible to know. I'm simply pointing out the contradiction.
If that were the case, its usage would be limited to truisms since those are the only things that can not be doubted. Yet people use it in ordinary language all the time.
It is, if the definition of god is inconsistent.
Assuming "god" were defined in a consistent way (which it isn't most of the time), and using your definition for knowledge (which is contrived for the purpose of being excluded from usage in this conversation), then sure.
Knowledge is belief based on observation/definition. But belief can also be based on desire (faith) or instinct (possibly more). Not all belief is knowledge, but all knowledge is belief.
Do you deny that the words "know" and "knowledge" are used in everyday language to simply mean "strongly believe"? I don't see that it's productive to redefine words for metaphysical discussions. That seems deceptive to me.
Originally posted by Simon_the_byron
I deserve a hostile reaction for having the audacity to question you? O..K..
Originally posted by Simon_the_byron
You cannot know God does not exist because it would require absolute knowledge to do so.
Originally posted by Simon_the_byron
What is so difficult about posting the word 'believe' in place of the word 'know?'
Originally posted by Simon_the_byron
And if the definition of God is consistent - what then?
Originally posted by Simon_the_byron
You're assuming a lot here.
Originally posted by just me 2
If sinners were not punished for all their wrong doings then He wouldn't be a just God, now would He?
Originally posted by just me 2
Don't parents punish their children when they do something wrong? Most of the ones I know do, anyways!
Hello spamandham; I would agree with you if that where true. The problem is what you are saying is the doctrine of man; the Bible clearly shows that there is no eternal suffering or torture. The wicked at the final day of Judgment are DESTROYED. You are eternally separated from the creator. you see not, speak not, hear not; you simply CEASE to EXIST.
Originally posted by spamandham3rd party sacrifice is not justice. Infinite torture for finite crimes is also not justice. Punishment is intended for one of two purposes; reform, or deterence. Unverifiable infinite torture accomplishes neither of those and is thus simply sadistic revenge, not punishment.
People who come to know reason have their whole life to come to know God, but when they reject God they reject his love. You can not make or force someone to Love you that would be sadistic and insane. God destroys the wicked to END THEIR SUFFERING.
Originally posted by spamandhamGood parents will correct thier children, however, they will not torture them for eternity, nor will they kill themselves as a sacrifice to themselves and let their children off the hook of their insane proclamations as a result.
The god you worship is sadistic and insane, and you must drag yourself down to his level.
Originally posted by GameSetMatch
the Bible clearly shows that there is no eternal suffering or torture.
Originally posted by GameSetMatch
The wicked at the final day of Judgment are DESTROYED. You are eternally separated from the creator. you see not, speak not, hear not; you simply CEASE to EXIST.
Originally posted by GameSetMatch
People who come to know reason have their whole life to come to know God, but when they reject God they reject his love.
Originally posted by spamandham
Originally posted by GameSetMatch
People who come to know reason have their whole life to come to know God, but when they reject God they reject his love.
Belief in god is obtained through faith, not reason. Reason opposes faith. Those who do not use faith do not have knowledge of god and can thus not make a decision to reject god. Since faith is not derived by reason, you must have faith in faith before you can have faith in god.
Punishment is intended for one of two purposes; reform, or deterence.
Unverifiable infinite torture accomplishes neither of those and is thus simply sadistic revenge, not punishment.
Originally posted by just me 2
Unverifiable infinite torture accomplishes neither of those and is thus simply sadistic revenge, not punishment.
If you believe in the Bible, it would be verifiable.
Originally posted by just me 2
The only reason you think it's unverifiable, is because you don't believe in it.
Originally posted by just me 2
1 Corinthians 1:18
"For the message of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God."
Originally posted by just me 2
1 Corinthians 1:25
"For the foolishness of God is wiser than man's wisdom, and the weakness of God is stronger than man's strength."
quote: Originally posted by just me 2
1 Corinthians 1:18
"For the message of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God."
Then you said:
I have to agree with Paul on this one, it is foolishness.
quote: Originally posted by just me 2
1 Corinthians 1:25
"For the foolishness of God is wiser than man's wisdom, and the weakness of God is stronger than man's strength."
Then you said:
Paul is giving man's wisdom in this verse. Try again.
Originally posted by just me 2
So, in other words, you admit that you are perishing?
Originally posted by just me 2
So, the text tells us that it is Christ's wisdom, not Paul's!
So if Paul tells us Paul's writing is Christ's wisdom, that makes it true? You're kidding right?
Originally posted by just me 2
No, I'm not kidding! Because it is in the Bible, it IS ABSOLUTELY TRUE!! One day you will believe, but then it will be too late!
Originally posted by just me 2
Because it is in the Bible, it IS ABSOLUTELY TRUE!! One day you will believe, but then it will be too late!