It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The nation’s first two Stryker brigades each have completed a year-long tour in Iraq. Their combined combat experiences have taught the Army—and critics—much about the effectiveness of the Stryker vehicle as well as the brigade, itself.
“The Stryker, as a vehicle, has proven its worth. It has saved lives,” said Maj. Nicholas Mullen, rear detachment commander of the 1st Brigade, 25th Infantry Division, which is known as the second Stryker brigade combat team.
Since the Army first announced the establishment of a new medium force of fighters in 1999 and selected the Stryker vehicle as its platform in 2000, the Stryker brigade has been under constant scrutiny. That attention has focused almost exclusively upon the 19-ton, eight-wheeled armored vehicle for which the brigade is named.
“We were getting all the attacks about why the Stryker is too heavy, too big, too tall, too wheeled,” said Col. Michael Peppers, director of the G37 Division at Fort Lewis, Wash., where the two brigades are based.
Early on, the Government Accountability Office questioned the Stryker’s transportability aboard a C-130.
“It does fit on a C-130. I’ve flown in one with it,” said Lt. Col. William James, deputy commander of 3rd Brigade, 2nd Infantry Division, also known as the first Stryker Brigade Combat Team.
The vehicle, designed to carry a nine-man squad and two-man crew, has shown that its survivability, agility, mobility and technology is effective in an urban combat zone where the enemy strikes at any time in numerous ways, said Peppers.
“It is the vehicle of choice from what we’ve seen [in Iraq]—incredibly robust, can take a lot of punishment. I’ve seen it hit with multiple rocket-propelled grenades and keep going. I’ve seen it hit with vehicle-borne bombs that you wonder how anybody could have survived—and everybody walks away,” said Mullen.
During a recent visit to Fort Lewis, near Tacoma, soldiers and officers who fought in Iraq defended the vehicle with passionate praise.
“I’m going back for a second year in Iraq, and I’m damn glad I’m going in a Stryker,” said James of 3/2. The first Stryker brigade is training for deployment next summer (see related story).
Originally posted by jetsetter
This topic is not really about the RPG-7. The Stryker has actually been able to take the hits and keep going.
Originally posted by GrOuNd_ZeRo
Thank you NR!
I hope that a conflict will not come between the US and Iran or Syria since it will be a bloody battle, I hope that a peaceful solution will be found.
I love weapons but I hate war, quite hypocrittical, but suffering is no fun...
Originally posted by GrOuNd_ZeRo
Thank you NR!
I hope that a conflict will not come between the US and Iran or Syria since it will be a bloody battle, I hope that a peaceful solution will be found.
I love weapons but I hate war, quite hypocrittical, but suffering is no fun...
Originally posted by deltaboy
so for those who have criticized the Stryker's performance or belief it will not be an effective vehicle in urban areas or for guerilla warfare. BOOYAH!!
dis proves dat the vehicles are good for its specifications and is able to adapt where tanks are not meant to drive into where it pretty much destroys things in its path like the roads for example.
Originally posted by skippytjc
The Duece Four has been using and RAVING about the Stryker for over a year now. They credit countless lives saved on the Stryker.
Initial problems were overstated or corrected.
The Duecefour would get hit at least once per week, and they lost only a very small number of troops when a Stryker was involved.
Read Michael Yons blog to get some grade A first hand accounts of how amazing the Stryker was in combat.
Yet another example of superior American tach thats been proven in real actual combat. Just like the Abrams, best combat record in the history of warfare.
Originally posted by skippytjc
Well, the M1 Ambrams does in fact have the best combat record in the history of tanks. But you are right I cannot make that claim for the Stryker.
But bottom line is that it perfomed many times better than people gave it credit for. Fact.
Read this (you wont):
search.blogger.com...
[edit on 4-11-2005 by skippytjc]
Originally posted by skippytjc
[...]Yet another example of superior American tach thats been proven in real actual combat. Just like the Abrams, best combat record in the history of warfare.
Originally posted by skippytjc
Well, the M1 Ambrams does in fact have the best combat record in the history of tanks. But you are right I cannot make that claim for the Stryker.
But bottom line is that it perfomed many times better than people gave it credit for. Fact.
Originally posted by NR
j/k but when it comes to big cities and crowded crowds all over the place you cant really escape this powerfull weapon.