Hey Nickel,
Actually, I have read 'The Things They Carried' several times. I'm a big fan of Tim O'Brien, as well as his style of writing. It's on my list of
books to re-read before skool starts.

(Have you read his 'If I Die in War Zone...'? A great read for those of us who might very well get
drafted..)
I like his style of writing.. so straight to the point. His sentences never get very long, which is a great reminder for me, who's a great fan of
semi-colons and commas! (Actually, his writing style changes slightly, if I remember correctly; 'Things they carried' has shorter sentences, and
'If I die in a war zone...' has slightly longer ones, more parenthasis and such. There's more thinking in the latter, more observation in the
former. Truly, a great way of setting the scene without the reader being completely aware of it..)
I started reading the few war books I have, actually, in trying to work thru my short story. The basic idea is, well, a war scene.. but, the odd part
of the story is that I want to portray the soldiers as men, and as boys.. the scene could be men at war, or boys playing like they're at war.. (My
title so far is "Boys will be Boys"..)
I figure since the boys and I have heard tons of war stories (I know that all their fathers were war veterans), then it's not such a far fetch for
them to know the lingo, and how things work when on the battlefield. (And this is where Tim O'Brien would fit in nicely.)
However, its the blurring of lines that's getting me.. simply because I don't want to officially state whether the characters are men or boys. The
more that I work on it, however, the more I'm realizing that I have to take a stance one way or the other.. even if I switch it later. (I thought
about writing one version with them as men, then other with them as boys, the mixing the two... but that seems to be more work than is necessary..)