It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Souljah
OK - so you Pledge to Support & Protect the Constitution of the United States, against ALL Enemies.
Foreign AND Domestic.
Now lets say, that President of the United States is "hypotheticaly" breaking the Constitution and the Bill of Rights and the Amendements himself!
Would he, at that point, represent the "Domestic Enemy" - who should be Removed, since Constitution should be defended at all cost?
What happens when President of the United States starts to Break the Constitution of the US?
Should Troops at that time, start to Doubt their Commander in Chief and dissobey Orders?
OR,
is that something that a Soldier can not Afford to do - since it is a Luxury he can not afford.
A soldier does not have the priviledge of Moral Questions about the Presidents Order. He should follow orders. Period.
[edit on 2/11/05 by Souljah]
Originally posted by devilwasp
Well mate thats your opinion.
Originally posted by ANOK
How is that opinion? I was there and I am talking about the troops I was there with, not opinion.
If you won't even listen to someone WHO WAS THERE and experienced what you are talking about first hand, who will you listen to?
I know you don't want your nice safe illusion that, all troops are super heroes who never think of themselves as they selflessly give their lives for your "freedom", dashed.
Anything to help ease the guilt and make it easier to swallow media BS, eh?
And looking back I don't see how my service helped YOU or anyone be safer or maintain their "freedom".
When you have some personal experience to fall on then come back and we'll talk, otherwise everythign YOU say on the subject is just opinion. And opinion handed to you from the biased media and government I might add.
Originally posted by ANOK
Dude you are the one who is only listening to one side!
You constantly throw out anything that doesn't fit your supplied view of the World.
I try to offer alternatives to make ppl think, not neseccarily to make you believe my point of view. But you don't even do that, you dismiss anything that does not fit your delusional World view.
And what do you mean by guarding an airfield? We're you refering to me? If you were again your facts are wrong. I didn't guard anything. I launched and recovered aircraft on the flight deck (USS Saratoga) during GW1.
[edit on 28/11/2005 by ANOK]
Originally posted by ANOK
And you have no right to put words in my mouth, or make assumptions based on...well nothing...
I have never met you, you are right, so I can only go by what you have posted on this forum.
And who's jamming what down who's throat?
I just write what I feel like everyone on this board, you have the choice whether you want to read it or not, I'm not forcing you am I?
Sorry if I write things you don't want to hear.
What a boring place it would be if we all posted what YOU want to read....
We learn by stretching the boundaries, by looking at alternative viewpoints.
If we only look at what we are told to then we learn nothing.
Sometimes those alternative viepoints ARE wrong, but if we just dismiss them without even looking at them then why even come here?
Originally posted by Skadi_the_Evil_Elf
Soldiers DO defend our freedoms. They defend us from foreign threats to our freedoms. But they are not the only defenders of freedom. On the home front there are many other defenders of our freedoms. Activists, police, clergy, and many private citizens wage war against all enemies of freedom at home. Its frar more complex than your simplistic black and white world. Soldiers are but one segment of a greater army that defends freedom.
You seem to forget that many soldiers do support their commander in Chief and the war in Iraq for their own reasons. There are many who believe in what they are doing because thats an opinion they formed of their own free will. Simply because you oppose the war does not mean that is the only "right" answer.
Originally posted by ADVISOR
It is not so much the man, as the seat he is in.
Originally posted by megabuster28
Then it will sink in FINALLY for those that are too dumb right now. They'll remember:
"A house divided against itself cannot stand."
If we could see how 'advanced' nations are using 'developed' and 'poor' nations as slaves, we would see how that speech might give us perspective. We need more perspective on a planet that is getting smaller, and especially on a planet where weapons are getting bigger. Our minds should get bigger instead.
Originally posted by LeftBehind
Just thought I'd point out, that while the Iraq war is not defending our freedom, the presence of our military does.
If we had not army whatsoever, we would lose our freedom.
If we had not mobilized to fight WWII, there is a good chance that we would have lost our freedoms.