Shortly after the London terror bombings this past summer, I watched on TV a BBC news reporter doing a story. After talking about the response and
future actions of the police and government, she made sure to end it with "there is certinly going to be a new world order here in London."
Okay, but this is what I mean about seizing upon every instance of this term being used. The fact that one lone reporter in the BBC used this term
does not constitute evidence for the existence of the NWO. Is this reporter a member of the NWO? If she is, why would she make such a comment,
potentially revealing the existence of an organisation which, from what we are led to believe, has gone out of its way to maintain its secrecy
throughout the centuries? It just doesn't make sense to me that some reporter, even in an organisation as prominent as the BBC, would be an agent of
the NWO. Nor does it make sense to me that her editors would pass on orders to specifically use the term "new world order" as part of an actual NWO
agenda. It just doesn't carry enough force, in my opinion. What I mean by this is: even if the NWO decided to introduce this kind of language through
the media to prepare the Masses for the establishment of NWO rule, why do so through a single reporter who only utters the phrase once? It just seems
to me to be somewhat beneath an organisation as subtle as the NWO is said to be.
It does appear to me that London has a well-above-average amount of NWO style activety compared with other world cities. What with the British Crown,
Bank of England, City of London, Freemasons, the New Age movement, British-Israelism, etc...
But what evidence can you present to link any of these institutions or movements to the NWO? The British Crown, for instance, is often cited as a
major player in the NWO, but where is the tangible, hard evidence to corroborate this? What do we have to support these arguments other than heresay
and speculation? Do we have any documents that strongly suggest such a link? I should like to see some before making any assumptions. Similarly, where
is the real-world evidence that the Freemasons are involved, or the New Age movement? As for "British-Israelism", wouldn't this run counter to the
Crown's involvement, given that the Queen is the annointed "Defender of the Faith" under the Church of England
). Surely her interests would therefore run counter to pro-Jewish interests in the NWO? It just seems somewhat contradictory to me.
I'd say the summer olympics is the largest event in the world. If the stars in heaven really do tell of some new age beginning in 2012, why not time
human activities here on earth to coincide with that date!
But for this theory to be true, you must assume that the date for the Olympics was set specifically to correspond with the Mayan date of 2012 back in
the late 1800s, when the modern Games were resurrected by Frenchmen Pierre Fredy. The first modern Games was held in 1896 and there has been one every
four years since, with the exception of the Games that were to have been held during World War 2
). For the 2012 date to have any kind of correlation with the Olympics and the NWO,
Fredy must have not only been a NWO member or agent, but must have deliberately picked 1896 as the starting date with the future date of 2012 as his
primary focus. I simply cannot believe that this was the case. Furthermore, such subtelty seems at odds with the garish supposed efforts of the NWO
recently, as suggested through the reporter, for example.
Which is most plausible? Both.
But again, why bother? Who cares what a car commercial says? What does it have to do with taking over the world or preparing the Masses for
domination? It's just one single commerical that most of us have never even seen. Surely the NWO, with all their resources, could think of more
subtle or more far-reaching techniques with which to sway the Masses?