It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Aether
Originally posted by ledbedder20
And when any of you "debunkers" trying to cite thermodynamics or the limits of electromagnetism can explain why permanent magnets can perpetually hover opposite another similarly charged magnet without disrupting the energy/matter equation or what makes protons and electrons orbit each other, then you can say there is no free energy.
Until then, I don't think you really know what you guys are talking about. It's pretty easy to say "thermodynamics", but there are so many things that the worlds of physics and electrical engineering don't understand, so until conventional wisdom can completely explain every aspect associated with a unified field theory, don't say something is impossible. If you do, you're the one who looks like a fool, not the guy trying to figure it out.
supply of gravity from the earth, the sun, from any celstial body with mass. It's a force
So I would consider it a form of energy
Hydrogen radiation is another abundant resource in our universe.
So, for all of you guys who refuse to believe in the potential that this technology carries, good luck. Because I would hate to have such a pessimistic and negative outlook on everything, especially considering all of the evidence for an energy breakthrough.
[edit on 3-10-2004 by ledbedder20]
what is a charged magnet?
what energy/matter equation are you talking about?
Conservation of energy?
I thought electrons orbited the nucleus?
There's no such thing as free energy.
Especially with magnets, induced fields, ever heard of Lenz's Law?
When has a force ever been considered an amount of energy? I could punch through a wall with x amount of force, but still not create energy. Unless....maybe I created so much friction that my hands started the door on fire.
Where is this hydrogen you speak of?
You state a lot of things, they are interesting, but just don't match up.
One of the most important inventions of Nikola Tesla was was the electrical transmitter. Shortly after leaving his Colorado research facility and returning to New York, Tesla began construction of an gigantic version of this invention, to be known as The Wardenclyffe Tower. Constructed between 1900-1905, the tower stood 187 ft into the air, with a 68 ft metal dome The purpose of the tower was to transmit wireless messages across the Atlantic and, as he had told his financier J.P. Morgan, provide free energy to the entire globe.
Tesla believed this to be a simple procedure, and later confirmed through experimentation, that the Earth conducts electricity naturally, much like a metal ball. Tesla hypothesized that Earth could be charged from a single location and energy could be safely extracted from any other point on the globe's surface.
The Earth could be pumped with electricity and anyone on its surface could remove it by simply placing a wire into the ground. This energy could be withdrawn in unlimited amounts for unlimited uses, free for all the world's people!
The Wardenclyffe Tower was never completed. Morgan refused Tesla the funds necessary to complete construction, and finding alternate financing proved impossible.
The Tower at Wardenclyffe was later dismantled under F.B.I. supervision.
Read on here
Originally posted by markjaxson
Exactly its FREE, which means the governments wouldnt make as much money as using oil and the likes of earth distructing energies.
Also this is why we dont use water fueled cars etc because the governments are greedy people.
This is a good thread i was going to discuss this awhile ago but never got around to it.
Originally posted by mwm1331
Except for a few reasoned and informed posts I dont think I have ever seen so much ignorance packed into a single thread in my entire life. If this isn't proof that public schools need to focus on science more I don't know what is.
Americans are Gods chosen people
Which posts have you deemed ignorant and which posts have you deemed acceptable?
A windmill is a free energy device, a solar cell is a free energy device, a fusion reactor is a free energy device, a hydroelectric is a free energy device. Even a non-rechargable battery is a free energy device.
It's free because the input energy is less than the amount of energy than you get out of it.